Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Fill your hands you son of a bitch |
He might have to do the unthinkable to get out of this situation, become a Democrat. | |||
|
Doin' what I can with what I got |
Yes, apples to oranges. ---------------------------------------- Death smiles at us all. Be sure you smile back. | |||
|
Shall Not Be Infringed |
THIS!! Seriously, there's way too much speculating going on here! Maybe we could/should wait for the actual facts to come out before we convict Gaetz! ____________________________________________________________ If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !! Trump 2024....Make America Great Again! "May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20 Live Free or Die! | |||
|
safe & sound |
It can be Volkswagons to crayons. It makes zero sense. There is no federal age of consent, just like there's no federal legal gambling ages. How can it be illegal (federally at that) for one person to do the exact same thing that it's legal for another based solely on the state they claim residence in? And before anybody chimes in and says "well it is", that's great. It still makes no sense. If this is how it has to be, then we should eliminate all state laws that contradict one another and simply have single federal rules that cover us all. Let's reverse this for a second. What if a guy like Gaetz went to Ohio where the age of consent is 16. He meets a girl he likes and takes her back to Florida and has sex with her there where the age of consent is 18. Florida could charge him. So are we saying that rules of a state should follow the resident even when he's out of state? Since I'm in Missouri, do the laws that govern me and my firearm extend with me to Illinois or New Jersey? | |||
|
Member |
Not in all cases: 794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.— (1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. In Florida, a 23 year old may engage in sexual activity with a 16 year old minor, if consensual. | |||
|
Nullus Anxietas |
Did you even bother to read the law I cited? Bottom line: It is a violation of federal law to transport a minor across state lines for the express purpose of subverting a state's laws relative to sexual activity. That law has been in place for 111 years.
In my inexpert opinion: Yes, because he'd be violating Florida law. In the former case he'd be violating Federal law.
You're missing the point. In the case we're discussing it isn't the violating of a state's laws that's at issue, per se. It's the transporting of a minor across state lines to avoid those state laws.
Apples/oranges. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher | |||
|
safe & sound |
Unless they come from a state where it's not legal to vacation, and then apparently it's a federal crime.
Then why have state laws? Why do Floridians need to go to prison for doing the exact same things Missourians do when all parties are in Missouri? That said, you're also making some serious assumptions. "express purpose of subverting a state's laws". If one wanted to "subvert laws" they wouldn't need to leave their state would they? Damned if they do, damned if they don't. Of course they're only "damned" if that's the only reason they crossed state lines. What if the express purpose for crossing state lines was to look at a used car and then everybody got horny?
Right. Just like an 18 year old leaving a state that requires you to be 21 to gamble for the express purpose of gambling while 18 in a state that allows it. Federal prison, stat! I completely understand and support efforts to thwart actual sex trafficking. But that's not what this is. In the state of New York, all persons under the age of 18 are required to wear a helmet while bicycling. In the neighboring state of Pennsylvania helmets are only required for those under the age of 12. If an adult and 16 year old New York residents cross into Pennsylvania for the express purpose of riding bikes, and do not wear helmets, which federal laws have they violated? | |||
|
Staring back from the abyss |
States get to do what they want to do. That's kind of how it was drawn up. ________________________________________________________ "Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton. | |||
|
Doin' what I can with what I got |
Yep. And at some point, enough states who said the age of consent was 18 got fed up with their minors being carted off to where they weren't minors for sordid purposes, and demanded a federal law address the practice. [shrug] ---------------------------------------- Death smiles at us all. Be sure you smile back. | |||
|
safe & sound |
Once again, it makes no sense. Since when does a state get to force its laws upon another state? Especially when the laws do not apply equally based solely on state of residence? And do you think that's reasonable? That a state would "get tired" of people leaving their state due to their laws to go somewhere else with laws they prefer, and then get the feds to "do something about it"? Yeah...no thanks. What other laws apply in this fashion? The particular act doesn't matter, I'm talking concept only. Where else is something legal here, illegal there. Those here aren't breaking the law, but those here from there are. I gave a bicycle helmet law example above. Should New Yorkers be charged federally when violating New York laws while in Pennsylvania even though what they are doing is legal in Pennsylvania? If New Jersey gets "fed up with minors being carted off where they weren't minors" to shoot firearms, should the feds send the adults shooting with them to prison? Assuming what they are doing is indeed legal within the state where they committed the offense of upsetting their state of residence? What about people who leave states where MJ is illegal in order to visit a state where it is legal. While there they smoke some. Should their state of residence or the federal government be able to charge them once they return home?This message has been edited. Last edited by: a1abdj, | |||
|
Member |
I think we might be getting confused here. Federal charges under the Mann Act have nothing to do with state "legal age" laws. "the most common use of the Mann Act was to prosecute men for having sex with underage females". Interesting reading about the Mann Act, especially the list of famous & infamous men who have been charged: Chuck Berry? Really? | |||
|
Member |
^^^^^^^^^^^ Yeah. Pretty sleazy history. Had an affinity for young girls. | |||
|
186,000 miles per second. It's the law. |
Lots of famous people got away with that shit. Look at Jimmy Page and Jerry Lewis. | |||
|
Needs a check up from the neck up |
Man, I liked this guy a lot but the sleaze is piling up pretty high. I sure as hell wouldn't let my daughter intern for him. __________________________ The entire reason for the Second Amendment is not for hunting, it’s not for target shooting … it’s there so that you and I can protect our homes and our children and and our families and our lives. And it’s also there as fundamental check on government tyranny. Sen Ted Cruz | |||
|
Member |
He's using the Trump defense: Blame the lying media, liberal Democrats, Iran hostages, the Justice dept. and my favorite: "Sure, I flew the girls down, put 'em up at Mara logo, even gave up some spending money. But I didn't do anything wrong! That girl told me she was 28!" I think the leak is coming from his fuck-buddy, the Seminole county tax collector that Gaetz squealed on. Maybe pot-daddy John Morgan threw him under the bus. | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
watch this video w Bob Kent. What a sleaze bag liar especially watch the text message from Kent to Gaetz father at 2'50" sec in the video, and Kent's reaction https://www.mediaite.com/tv/wa...of-extortion-scheme/ “And there was no attempt to extort, there was no threat, there was no demand,” Cuomo asked again. “There were no threats, there were no demands,” Kent said.This message has been edited. Last edited by: sdy, | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
Why don't you take that garbage and stick it in whatever leftist, shithole forum you tend to frequent and keep it out of here? ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
blame canada |
Bless your heart...you're a special kind of "touched" person, aren't you now. Is a single word of your ridiculousness tied in any way at all to this person or situation? You appear to be throwing up the usual media crap. Your lack of intelligence is showing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The trouble with our Liberal friends...is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan, 1964 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn't matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon will just take a shit on the board, strut around knocking over all the pieces and act like it won.. and in some cases it will insult you at the same time." DevlDogs55, 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.rikrlandvs.com | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
You have two choices: You can stow that shit permanently, or you can leave. You know where you are and you know you shouldn't post this horse shit, yet you did it anyway. You want to be noticed? OK, I'm noticing you. | |||
|
Member |
I agree with your assessment, but for me, the real surprise was Chris Cuomo's questioning. He held Kent's feet to the fire and literally had him squirming in his seat several times. That was not your typical CNN/Chris Cuomo interview. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |