SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The founding fathers did everything right except (fill in the blank).
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The founding fathers did everything right except (fill in the blank). Login/Join 
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
This is turning out better than I expected. A lot of interesting views. Man, I was so focused on the term limits that my tunnel vision prevented me from considering other stuff. Cool


Q






 
Posts: 28563 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Stupid
Allergy
Picture of dry-fly
posted Hide Post
Instead of "Shall not be infringed", they could have written "never, ever, under any circumstances be infringed". You know, just for extra clarification.


"Attack life, it's going to kill you anyway." Steve McQueen...
 
Posts: 7164 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: July 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
“English shall be the official language of the United States.”

And:

“If the President and Congress cannot agree on a budget, the new budget shall be the previous year’s budget, with all spending items, except debt service, reduced by one percent.”

Agreement would be quickly reached.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9794 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by maladat:
2. This might be taking things a little too far. Might! Every law and regulation except Constitutional amendments is required to have an expiration date of, say, five years from its date of passage. If it isn't important enough for someone to remember to and enough of Congress to agree to pass it again, then it doesn't need to be a law.


It's important to have some consistency, some "stability" in law that citizens can learn and rely on, and so while I'm not in complete agreement I do agree with something along that same vein.

Locally, I refuse to support any tax that doesn't include a "sunset provision". How about a Constitutional provision that requires that any bill proposed by Congress that imposes a tax, or a tax increase, or any governmental spending, also include a sunset provision with a specified date?


quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
“English shall be the official language of the United States.”


While it probably wasn't as big an issue when the Founding Fathers were debating the Constitution, I am in complete agreement, and was just about to edit my post to include this very thing. In fact, I'd support a Constitutional provision that established some sort of basic reading/writing/comprehension for both citizens and legal immigrants trying to become citizens.
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
“English shall be the official language of the United States.”

And:

“If the President and Congress cannot agree on a budget, the new budget shall be the previous year’s budget, with all spending items, except debt service, reduced by one percent.”

Agreement would be quickly reached.


I like your two amendments. I'd like to add a third regarding election spending.

All money must originate from whatever state it is spent in. If you are not a resident of that state you may not contribute to any officials for local, state, or congressional positions. No interstate PACs. Businesses must have operations in the state they are contributing and are limited to contributing to no more than three state level or congressional campaigns in any give year.

The fact that someone in California or New York can contribute money in my state to attempt to impose their will on me pisses me off. It skews the balance of power to richer states.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21395 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Music's over turn
out the lights
Picture of David W
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:

“If the President and Congress cannot agree on a budget, the new budget shall be the previous year’s budget, with all spending items, except debt service, reduced by one percent.”

Agreement would be quickly reached.


Yes sir, the new budget would take about a week.


David W.

Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud. -Sophocles
 
Posts: 3654 | Location: Winston Salem, N.C. | Registered: May 30, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shorted to Atmosphere
Picture of Shifferbrains
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by synthplayer:
quote:
Originally posted by Shifferbrains:
Slavery. Just think of the BS that could have been averted if they'd just fully realized what Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, All Men are Created Equal.


I seriously don't mean to offend you, but this topic has much, much more detail involved than you think.

To be brief, after winning the war for independence, the 13 states faced a dilemma. With the French, Spaniards, British armies (navies) AND the aborigines ("Indians") all being enemies, their only chance of survival was to UNITE as one nation. They held different opinions with regard to slavery, so certain compromises had to be made by the states in the North.

YET, if you study the constitution closely, the wording IS THERE to make the credible argument against slavery. You see the statement "All men are created equal" and see hypocrisy. I see it as a postponement of the final decision about slavery.

Sadly that postponement led to a conclusive war beginning in 1861.

Given the many hurdles the Founding Fathers were challenged with, I stand amazed at their genius. They were all devout Christians, and prayed fervently in all of their endeavors. I believe God was with them, and they did an excellent job. They created the best country the world has ever known!

But, there has been a force to undermine everything they achieved, and that force has been the Democrat Party.

Our Founding Fathers knew there would be forces of evil within the country, so they gave us many admonitions - most of which have been ignored, and we're now seeing the results of the failure to heed their warnings.

They told us things like:

* The cost of freedom is constant vigilance. A very large number of our population are not vigilant whatsoever. Many times I have shared with Democrat voters information about the very politicians they have voted for, THEN they regret having voted for them. Had they been vigilant, they would've have done a little research before they walked into the voting booth and searched for the "D." And, oh how easy it is to do research TODAY with the advent of the Internet!

* Those who would trade freedom for a little prosperity deserve neither. Again, look at the driving force of the Democrat Party: Those looking for handouts. And, when Democrats are in charge, freedoms and RIGHTS are curtailed.

I could go on and on. But, anybody who assesses the state of the country in 2018, and then tries to blame it on mistakes made by our Founding Fathers is truly mistaken.


Not offended at all. That's why I said, just think if. I realize there were different strongly held beliefs at the time, and that compromises had to be made. And yes I do see it as hypocrisy, as most were of strong Christian faiths. As such, one man owning another man just does not adhere to the teachings of Jesus.

My contention is that if they could have compromised in the other direction, our country will have been spared so much hatred, strife and ongoing animosity.
 
Posts: 5202 | Location: Manteca, CA | Registered: May 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
This is a great thread!
I agree with practically everything posted so far. Term limit all the damn legislators... absolutely!

quote:
Originally posted by MikeinNC:
i think you should have to be a landowner to vote, local state or national.

Yes, you've gotta have skin in the game to vote!
The Founders originally wanted property owners, but that was before the income tax. Now, I think taxpayer would be the equivalent.

quote:
1) the federal gov’t can’t tax an individual more than X%. Let’s call it 12%. This will limit the size of the fed govt.

2) fed govt can’t proceed without a balanced budget

3) money from outside a state can’t be spent on state and local elections.

4) clearly limit the commerce clause so it can’t be used as an excuse for the fed govt to do whatever they want.
E.S. Dunbar

Yes! .

quote:
I think they did a pretty fine job. There are some things (the Federal Reserve comes to mind) that are clearly evil, horrendous, and have as their sole purpose to rob people of the fruits of their labors, but I am not sure that they could have seen that coming.

I agree.
The Founders didn't foresee the "progressive era" beginning around 1900 and culminating in the Federal Reserve Act, the 16th and 17th amendments in 1913, all of which should be repealed.

This will be controversial, but I would even repeal the 19th amendment if I could. Not all women, of course, but the majority of women tend to vote with their emotions.



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 25095 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ewills
posted Hide Post
I am a fan of the landowner requirement to vote. Paying income taxes might be an acceptable additional or substitute requirement.
 
Posts: 308 | Location: NOVA | Registered: February 15, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 2BobTanner
posted Hide Post
Specifically state that any State could withdraw from the Union compact (Constitution), with no ramifications nor hard feelings, and said withdrawn State would be accepted as an equal foreign nation among the sister of foreign nations.

Whether the United States would have existed for more than 25 years, much less until 1860, is a subject for a “Alternative/Counter-factual History” books by Harry Turtledove.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 2BobTanner,


---------------------
DJT-45/47 MAGA !!!!!

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." — Mark Twain

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.” — H. L. Mencken
 
Posts: 2866 | Location: Falls of the Ohio River, Kain-tuk-e | Registered: January 13, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ewills:
I am a fan of the landowner requirement to vote. Paying income taxes might be an acceptable additional or substitute requirement.
Agreed, and you would need to pay NET taxes, not just point to your W-2 but then get more back in a refund than you paid in taxes... because then you didn't really pay any taxes.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mark123:
quote:
Originally posted by reloader-1:
I’d go back to the Roman ideal of a citizen serving in government and returning to his farm afterwards (ala Cincinnatus). Granted, this was an ideal and not a common practice, but I’d do it as follows:

Random number drawn in a lottery every 6 years, powerball style, for senators and representatives. To be eligible, you must be a citizen, and not a felon or owe any back taxes. That’s it - you can decline appointment, and once appointed can never hold office again.
I like it. Make it a solemn duty, a necessary service to your constituency and not a position of power. I'd also bar anyone actively seeking the position.

I'd probably also rewrite the 2nd amendment so it cannot be purposely misconstrued. Something like this:

"Seeing that military, para-military, police and other organizations are necessarily to secure freedom and legal order and seeing that they are corruptible by the government, no government organization can legally limit the right of the people to purchase, make, keep, sell or transfer any form of weaponry."
You need to add "carry".

And I would have wanted them to include in the wording of the Constitution exactly what they meant by "natural born citizen"....

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be not wise in
thine own eyes
Picture of kimber1911
posted Hide Post
1. Term limits
2. Only contributing members of society should be allowed to vote.
If you receive more from the government (other people's money) than you pay in, you should not have the right to vote.

Money is the root of evil.
Politicians with unlimited term limits can more easily sell their influence, becoming rich while bringing corruption into government service.

Voters that do not pay taxes and receive benefits will readily vote themselves more of other people's money.



“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Pres. Select, Joe Biden

“Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021
 
Posts: 5301 | Location: USA | Registered: December 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of SevenPlusOne
posted Hide Post
quote:
This will be controversial, but I would even repeal the 19th amendment if I could. Not all women, of course, but the majority of women tend to vote with their emotions.

Food for thought: Men died for centuries to secure their/our right to vote, and not be ruled by a monarchy. Men then gave that same right to women, simply because they asked.



"Ninja kick the damn rabbit"
 
Posts: 4654 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: October 11, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
W07VH5
Picture of mark123
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flashguy:
quote:
Originally posted by mark123:
quote:
Originally posted by reloader-1:
I’d go back to the Roman ideal of a citizen serving in government and returning to his farm afterwards (ala Cincinnatus). Granted, this was an ideal and not a common practice, but I’d do it as follows:

Random number drawn in a lottery every 6 years, powerball style, for senators and representatives. To be eligible, you must be a citizen, and not a felon or owe any back taxes. That’s it - you can decline appointment, and once appointed can never hold office again.
I like it. Make it a solemn duty, a necessary service to your constituency and not a position of power. I'd also bar anyone actively seeking the position.

I'd probably also rewrite the 2nd amendment so it cannot be purposely misconstrued. Something like this:

"Seeing that military, para-military, police and other organizations are necessarily to secure freedom and legal order and seeing that they are corruptible by the government, no government organization can legally limit the right of the people to purchase, make, keep, sell or transfer any form of weaponry."
You need to add "carry".

And I would have wanted them to include in the wording of the Constitution exactly what they meant by "natural born citizen"....

flashguy
Yes, I should add "carry".
 
Posts: 45794 | Location: Pennsyltucky | Registered: December 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Wait, what?
Picture of gearhounds
posted Hide Post
Term limits, and nobody that is not a bonafide citizen that contributes to the country (ie- has a job, pays taxes, swears allegiance to the country) can be allowed to vote in any election.




“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
 
Posts: 16040 | Location: Martinsburg WV | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kimber1911:
1. Term limits
2. Only contributing members of society should be allowed to vote.
If you receive more from the government (other people's money) than you pay in, you should not have the right to vote.
...
Voters that do not pay taxes and receive benefits will readily vote themselves more of other people's money.
That needs to be very carefully worded. I am retired and receive a military pension and Social Security, both of which come out of taxes, but were benefits that I earned by former service and employment. I also pay a considerable amount of federal taxes each year, but not more than my combined benefits.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be not wise in
thine own eyes
Picture of kimber1911
posted Hide Post
Oh I agree Flashguy, but I think all here know the intent I was trying to convey.
Working age, abled body, past contributions, and I am sure more exceptions would apply.



“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Pres. Select, Joe Biden

“Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021
 
Posts: 5301 | Location: USA | Registered: December 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Term limits. Once they get in, they never want to leave and it seems the focus is on staying in office rather than serving their constituents and country.

Political Action Committees and all the other assorted special interest lobby groups.

Foreign $$ and foreign interference with our election process.


Like guns, Love Sigs
 
Posts: 1229 | Location: Battle Born | Registered: December 26, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I would like to have seen something like this in the constitution. " Any politician that proposes legislation with the intent to disarm a citizen or infringe in any way upon the citizens right to obtain, possess and carry the firearms of their choice shall be found guilty of treason and summarily executed within a fortnight. "


No one's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session.- Mark Twain
 
Posts: 3699 | Location: TX | Registered: October 08, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The founding fathers did everything right except (fill in the blank).

© SIGforum 2024