SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Network gurus. Tell me if I'm doing this correctly.
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Network gurus. Tell me if I'm doing this correctly. Login/Join 
W07VH5
Picture of mark123
posted
I've got the pfSense box running well enough like this. Right now the NAS has a pihole and pivpn (wireguard) running on it so that I can be ok with running my phone on a public WiFi. I've got pfBlockerNg installed on the pfSense box so I may be rethinking that. Truthfully, I like how pihole and pivpn work so I may leave it as is.

There are no VLANs set up on the pfSense box, only on the switch. I figured VLANs on the pfSense was unnecessary as I have the 4 port PCIe, each with their own subnet(?), and I've plenty of space on the switch. Is that a mistake? Is there a better way?

The family computers and the NAS are on the 192.168.13.0 network.

Neither IoT network can ping the LAN or Trusted Wireless network.

Should I move the TVs so that the phones on the Trusted Wireless can stream to them?

This is my first attempt at securing and setting up the home network beyond sticking a router in there and running everything on 192.168.1.x. Do you see any glaring mistakes?



It seems to be working as expected.
 
Posts: 45854 | Location: Pennsyltucky | Registered: December 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The One True IcePick
Picture of eyrich
posted Hide Post
I'd probably combine the trusted wired/wireless and the iot wired/wireless. and just have a trust subnet and an IOT subnet.
I think you are adding complexity without any/enough reduction in risks.

That's what I have.

I don't stream from phones to TVs, I left my TV On the IOT network.




 
Posts: 886 | Location: IL | Registered: September 08, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eyrich:
I'd probably combine the trusted wired/wireless and the iot wired/wireless. and just have a trust subnet and an IOT subnet.
I think you are adding complexity without any/enough reduction in risks.

That's what I have.

I don't stream from phones to TVs, I left my TV On the IOT network.


^^^^ I agree ^^^^
 
Posts: 23629 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
W07VH5
Picture of mark123
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
quote:
Originally posted by eyrich:
I'd probably combine the trusted wired/wireless and the iot wired/wireless. and just have a trust subnet and an IOT subnet.
I think you are adding complexity without any/enough reduction in risks.

That's what I have.

I don't stream from phones to TVs, I left my TV On the IOT network.


^^^^ I agree ^^^^
I think you're both right. I'll just move the WAPs to their respective wired VLANs.

Now I've got two extra ports. Any other use for them?

Maybe I can use one for a dedicated management port and one for a database server.
 
Posts: 45854 | Location: Pennsyltucky | Registered: December 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Network gurus. Tell me if I'm doing this correctly.

© SIGforum 2025