SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    A Major Retailer Is Under Fire For Allegedly Listing ‘Cow’ As A Women’s Clothing Size
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
A Major Retailer Is Under Fire For Allegedly Listing ‘Cow’ As A Women’s Clothing Size Login/Join 
Savor the limelight
posted Hide Post
Some lawyer will milk it for all it’s worth.
 
Posts: 12008 | Location: SWFL | Registered: October 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Only the strong survive
Picture of 41
posted Hide Post
We use to call'em, Wide Tracker, TA. Big Grin


41
 
Posts: 11910 | Location: Herndon, VA | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Res ipsa loquitur
Picture of BB61
posted Hide Post
I was a haberdasher in college - the men’s side of clothing. For larger people, we had a suit size that you typically only saw in specialty stores called “portly. These suits were designed for men with, shall we say, extra large guts or as we would say, “He has chester drawers disease” which means the guys chest has fallen down to his drawers (beer belly).

Anyway, one day a friend came in with his mom and dad. His dad was looking for a new suit for church. As is typical with guys, we think we know our pant size and nothing will change our mind. So we were taught to just measure and then without saying much bring over a variety of suits we thought would fit. My friend’s dad was adamant he was a 42 regular (fairly common size). I measured it differently, way differently. Long story short, he was a 46 portly short (short and fat). Rather than telling him that, I gave him the pants and the suit coat I thought would fit to try on. When he came out of the changing room he was so proud about how well the suit fit and being right about his size. Then his wife asked me the size. “46 portly short Mrs. ____.” My friend drops to the floor laughing and the wife lost it too.

Best part of the story? He bought two suits from me.

From what I understand, women’s clothing has been resized. For example, an 8 today was mostly likely a 12 or 14 several years ago. That being said, I can’t see a business being so blunt. But it is 2021.


__________________________

 
Posts: 12661 | Registered: October 13, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    A Major Retailer Is Under Fire For Allegedly Listing ‘Cow’ As A Women’s Clothing Size

© SIGforum 2024