SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    At Least 61 US Veterans Who Guarded 'Contaminated' Ex-Russian Base Died Or Have Cancer
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
At Least 61 US Veterans Who Guarded 'Contaminated' Ex-Russian Base Died Or Have Cancer Login/Join 
Get my pies
outta the oven!

Picture of PASig
posted
Holy shit. Eek

I served with several people in the PA ANG who had been deployed to K2 Air Base in the 2000's.

Not good, not good at all:

quote:

...K2 was contaminated with chemical weapons remnants, radioactive processed uranium and other hazards, according to documents obtained by McClatchy.

At least 61 of the men and women who served at K2 had been diagnosed with cancer or died from the disease, according to a 2015 Army study on the base. But that number may not include the special operations forces deployed to K2, who were likely not counted due to the secrecy of their missions, the study reported...


At Least 61 US Veterans Who Guarded 'Contaminated' Ex-Russian Base Died Or Have Cancer

Karshi-Khanabad Air Base


 
Posts: 35154 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Ugh!

Pollution Controversy

Numerous United States Armed Forces veterans who served at the base while it was used the by U.S. military have claimed to have developed cancers and other ailments due to environmental contamination at the site. A "black goo" was described oozing out of the soil, appearing to be a mixture of solvents, oils and other chemicals. Noxious vapors were also reported, along with radiation warnings and a nearby pond that glowed green. Rainwater would reportedly flood their tents and appeared contaminated with various chemicals. [8] The United States Department of Veteran's Affairs and U.S. Army Public Health Center have both denied that an increased rate of cancers exists or that any contamination at the base posed any serious health problems. [9] The US military did, however, take steps to reduce possible sources of contamination. These steps were criticized as ineffective by veterans. [8]

link
 
Posts: 24664 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
God will always provide
Picture of Fla. Jim
posted Hide Post
Point 8 about the ostrich position taken, reminds me of agent orange denials.
 
Posts: 4467 | Location: White City, Florida | Registered: January 11, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Wasn't K2 where CIA & 5th SFG flew in to connect with the Northern Alliance during the earliest days in Nov'01; all air ops originated from K2?

Who wants to put money down that the brass that got contamination information about this base, pushed it aside and buried it, then reasoned that the base was too important to the war effort and nothing else mattered without considering any alternative sites.
 
Posts: 15191 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
Had K2 as a divert in the early days of OEF 2001, didn’t know what to expect if we landed but glad we never had to jump the border to the North. Tanking off USAF tanker drogues that looked like smashed tacos was worth the risk when that far north.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
quote:
radioactive processed uranium


And how would that end up in the wild?
 
Posts: 10080 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:
Wasn't K2 where CIA & 5th SFG flew in to connect with the Northern Alliance during the earliest days in Nov'01; all air ops originated from K2?
True that they ran a lot of SFG ops out of K2, but there were other routes for air support from day 1.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Wait, what?
Picture of gearhounds
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Voshterkoff:
quote:
radioactive processed uranium


And how would that end up in the wild?

The article said something about missile destruction; knowing the Russians, they probably destroyed them by simply blowing them up in place on the launchers.




“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
 
Posts: 15988 | Location: Martinsburg WV | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Non-Miscreant
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Voshterkoff:
quote:
radioactive processed uranium


And how would that end up in the wild?


We used the stuff for armor piercing rounds in the A10 ammo. Its hard to dispose of, but easy to shoot it. Lots cheaper than tungsten carbide.

There was a clean up problem in Kosovo, never heard about it being taken care of. I'm not trying to cover for the Ruskies, but we're no better in this regard.


Unhappy ammo seeker
 
Posts: 18394 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: February 25, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
A friend of mine (who is actually quoted in the linked McClatchy article) sent this to me earlier in the week.

I hope this new exposure helps them get the assistance they need, going forward.

- Brian


--------------------
||| P226R (.40) ||| P6 ||| P320 X5 ||| SP2022 (.40) |||
 
Posts: 412 | Location: Northeast Florida | Registered: January 16, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
My buddies in the 20th were there.
Several are sick. Several have died.
Some really bad stuff was in that environment.


GW.
 
Posts: 642 | Location: Auburn, AL | Registered: August 24, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    At Least 61 US Veterans Who Guarded 'Contaminated' Ex-Russian Base Died Or Have Cancer

© SIGforum 2024