Apple suspends error-strewn AI generated news alerts

Apple has suspended a new artificial intelligence (AI) feature that drew criticism and complaints for making repeated mistakes in its summaries of news headlines.
The tech giant had been facing mounting pressure to withdraw the service, which sent notifications that appeared to come from within news organisations' apps.
"We are working on improvements and will make them available in a future software update," an Apple spokesperson said.
Journalism body Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said it showed the dangers of rushing out new features.
"Innovation must never come at the expense of the right of citizens to receive reliable information," it said in a statement.
"This feature should not be rolled out again until there is zero risk it will publish inaccurate headlines," RSF's Vincent Berthier added.
False reports
The BBC was among the groups to complain about the feature, after an alert generated by Apple's AI falsely told some readers that Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, had shot himself.
The feature had also inaccurately summarised headlines from Sky News, the New York Times and the Washington Post, according to reports from journalists and others on social media.
"There is a huge imperative [for tech firms] to be the first one to release new features," said Jonathan Bright, head of AI for public services at the Alan Turing Institute.
Hallucinations - where an AI model makes things up - are a "real concern," he added, "and as yet firms don't have a way of systematically guaranteeing that AI models will never hallucinate, apart from human oversight.
"As well as misinforming the public, such hallucinations have the potential to further damage trust in the news media," he said.
Media outlets and press groups had pushed the company to pull back, warning that the feature was not ready and that AI-generated errors were adding to issues of misinformation and falling trust in news.
The BBC complained to Apple in December but it did not respond until January when it promised a software update that would clarify the role of AI in creating the summaries, which were optional and only available to readers with the latest iPhones.
That prompted a further wave of criticism that the tech giant was not going far enough.

https://www.bbc.com/news/artic...placement=newsletter

There seem to be a lot of social media posts and other news articles using similar AI to write articles.
Even if they are factually correct, they have a certain writing style that makes them stand out.

quote:

Originally posted by 220-9er:
certain writing style that makes them stand out.

Part of me hopes that's not easily overcome, so as to make it easier to spot the AI vs the real.

AI results at the top of any internet search I've done have been thus far 100% garbage. The algorithms are clearly incapable of sorting good information from bad information and the results are an obvious mash-up of both. The programmers need to add BS meters to the algorithms, but smart people will design web pages to get around those.

Meanwhile, Grok has almost completely replaced my using a search engine.

Garbage in, Garbage out, it's all in the programing.
Trying to convince you YOUR critical thinking is obsolete.
Man made machines,to do what they are "programed"
don't be a machine!