SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Gubbermint working on tax reform
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Gubbermint working on tax reform Login/Join 
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nhtagmember:


You would never want a flat tax - you would end up paying a shitload more



You either do your own taxes or know how to do it. That's what I've been saying, too. ETA: nevermind. I see your post saying you do work in the tax business.

I like Trump's proposal. Unfortunately, as someone else opined, both Democrats and Republicans are out to derail Trump.



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 20142 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too clever by half
Picture of jigray3
posted Hide Post
I would dearly love to see us get rid of the state tax deduction. Why should the rest of us subsidize the socialist states with high tax rates. Let the residents of those states feel all the pain of their state's tax burden and demand relief from their politicians.




"We have a system that increasingly taxes work, and increasingly subsidizes non-work" - Milton Friedman
 
Posts: 10363 | Location: Richmond, VA | Registered: December 11, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
hello darkness
my old friend
Picture of gw3971
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jigray3:
I would dearly love to see us get rid of the state tax deduction. Why should the rest of us subsidize the socialist states with high tax rates. Let the residents of those states feel all the pain of their state's tax burden and demand relief from their politicians.
yep
 
Posts: 7743 | Location: West Jordan, Utah | Registered: June 19, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
. . .
Just take the $4 trillion federal budget... divide by the number of people.... about 330 million, and send everyone the same bill.
What does that come to?
$12,121.21 per person.


Sounds good, until my 10 and 11 year olds try to find $12,000 to pay their tax bill. They (like all children) make up a good portion of this population number, and have no ability to pay an annual tax bill in the five figures, when they have no income at all.
 
Posts: 514 | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Sounds good, until my 10 and 11 year olds try to find $12,000 to pay their tax bill. They (like all children) make up a good portion of this population number, and have no ability to pay an annual tax bill in the five figures

Exactly so.
We would have to divide the budget by the number of adults, not the number of people which would more than double your $12,000 tax bill to $25,000, or about $50,000/year for a married couple.
I think people would be clamoring for less government! Wink



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24703 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
So far so good; where there will be problems however, is that the bill also includes the repeal of an itemized deduction for medical expenses, a key provision for households with extraordinary health-care costs. It also repeals the tax credit for adoption and the deduction of student-loan interest. The bill also limits the home mortgage interest deduction: for new home purchases interest would be deductible only on loans up to $500,000, down from $1 million, although existing loans would be grandfathered.

A key issue will be the treatment of the state and local tax deduction, which lawmakers are proposing to cap at $10,000. That will not be enough for Republicans in some high-tax states, where middle-class families make heavy use of the deduction. As the NYT notes, "the compromise, as it had been sketched out this week, would preserve the deduction for property taxes, but not for state and local income taxes, and it appeared as if there would be a cap on the deduction. But at first glance, it did not appear as if that was enough to win over all of the New York and New Jersey members."

Here are the most notable changes:

Lowers individual tax rates for low- and middle-income Americans to Zero, 12%, 25%, and 35%; keeps tax rate for those making over $1 million at 39.6%
Increases the standard deduction from $6,350 to $12,000 for individuals and $12,700 to $24,000 for married couples.
Establishing a new Family Credit, which includes expanding the Child Tax Credit from $1,000 to $1,600
Preserving the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit
Preserves the Earned Income Tax Credit
Preserves the home mortgage interest deduction for existing mortgages and maintains the home mortgage interest deduction for newly purchased homes up to $500,000, half the current $1,000,000
Continues to allow people to write off the cost of state and local property taxes up to $10,000
Retains popular retirement savings options such as 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Accounts
Repeals the Alternative Minimum Tax
Lowers the corporate tax rate to 20% – down from 35%
Reduces the tax rate on business income to no more than 25%
Establishes strong safeguards to distinguish between individual wage income and “pass-through” business income
Allows businesses to immediately write off the full cost of new equipment
Retains the low-income housing tax credit

A visual summary of the new tax brackets:



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...ut-plan-ever-history



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24703 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The guy behind the guy
Picture of esdunbar
posted Hide Post
I think it looks good! pass it!

Then let's work on lowering the $10k deduction on SaLT over the next few years to $0.
 
Posts: 7548 | Registered: April 19, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Now in Florida
Picture of ChicagoSigMan
posted Hide Post
Not ideal by any stretch...but it's a uge improvement over the current laws. Now we'll have to see how much gets bargained away to buy the votes needed to pass it.
 
Posts: 6084 | Location: FL | Registered: March 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by esdunbar:
I think it looks good! pass it!
Then let's work on lowering the $10k deduction on SaLT over the next few years to $0.

I agree.... pass it!
Not ideal by any stretch...but it's a Yuge improvement over the current laws... pass it!



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24703 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by esdunbar:
I think it looks good! pass it!


Curious about the $112-190K bracket increasing by 5%. I was under the impression that this tax plan was intended to help the middle class. How exactly does a 5% increase to a big chunk of middle class folks help?

Pretty much everthing else looks OK though.


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 20711 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The guy behind the guy
Picture of esdunbar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gustofer:
quote:
Originally posted by esdunbar:
I think it looks good! pass it!


Curious about the $112-190K bracket increasing by 5%. I was under the impression that this tax plan was intended to help the middle class. How exactly does a 5% increase to a big chunk of middle class folks help?

Pretty much everthing else looks OK though.


I don't think an individual making 112 to 190 is middle class by definition.
 
Posts: 7548 | Registered: April 19, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by esdunbar:
quote:
Originally posted by Gustofer:
quote:
Originally posted by esdunbar:
I think it looks good! pass it!


Curious about the $112-190K bracket increasing by 5%. I was under the impression that this tax plan was intended to help the middle class. How exactly does a 5% increase to a big chunk of middle class folks help?

Pretty much everthing else looks OK though.


I don't think an individual making 112 to 190 is middle class by definition.


I do.

All I can say in this case is thank God I'm married.

And I'm not too happy about the $500,000 home mortgage interest deduction limit either.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 30998 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
I think the diagram above does not have the most current brackets

https://www.scribd.com/documen...x-Bill-Text#download

joint return

25% lower bracket 90,000
35% lower bracket 260,000
39.6% lower bracket 1,000,000
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
And I'm not too happy about the $500,000 home mortgage interest deduction limit either.

While I understand that in New Jersey, New York and CA $500,000 might be just a down payment and your mortgage may be much higher.... the deductibility of BIG mortgage interest does two things:
1. inflates the "value" of real estate
2. causes people in places where real estate is more "reasonable" to partially subsidize what we may consider outrageous prices.
... similar to the SALT deduction.

Under this proposal the interest is still deductible on the first $500,000 of your home mortgage.



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24703 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
and the 500k limit is only for newly purchased homes, not existing mortgages
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
quote:
And I'm not too happy about the $500,000 home mortgage interest deduction limit either.

While I understand that in New Jersey, New York and CA $500,000 might be just a down payment and your mortgage may be much higher.... the deductibility of BIG mortgage interest does two things:
1. inflates the "value" of real estate
2. causes people in places where real estate is more "reasonable" to partially subsidize what we may consider outrageous prices.
... similar to the SALT deduction.

Under this proposal the interest is still deductible on the first $500,000 of your home mortgage.


I see. Thanks for the deeper insight. I can't say I'm apposed to it really.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 30998 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
What I have read looks good so far.

---------------------------------


Proverbs 27:17 - As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.
 
Posts: 8940 | Location: Florida | Registered: September 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
Looks like I will lose a bit with this plan. I make about $105K. I have one child I can claim (divorced). My rate will stay 25%. I double my personal exemption to 12k. I lose $8100 in deductions (personal and child). I lose money state income tax deduction (about $5200. ). The increased child tax credit gets me about $100. Prior to this increase I was not eligible at all. Am I missing anything?




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12605 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
frayedends,

1. You will still be able to deduct up to 10,000 of state taxes (page 104 of the draft)

edit: Wash Post says this 10,000 limit is for property tax only. No deduction for state income tax. Need to learn more

2. You may have a higher standard deduction (18,300) if this applies:

unmarried individual with at least one qualifying child (within the meaning of section 7706)

Remember, I am no expert, just reading the proposed tax code


from Wash Post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com...ss/tax-bill-q-and-a/

A 12 percent rate would apply to individuals earning up to $67,500 and married couples earning up to $90,000

A 25 percent rate could apply to up to $200,000 for individuals and $260,000 for couples

A 35 percent rate would apply until $500,000 for individuals and up to $1 million for couples

A 39.6 percent rate would apply above $500,000 for individuals and above $1 million for couples
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official forum
SIG Pro
enthusiast
Picture of stickman428
posted Hide Post
Doesn't look like it will affect me too much but I'm glad to see those fortunate to make a lot of money won't be penalized for their success quite as much.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The price of liberty and even of common humanity is eternal vigilance
 
Posts: 21245 | Location: San Dimas CA, The Old Dominion or the Tar Heel State.  | Registered: April 16, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Gubbermint working on tax reform

© SIGforum 2024