Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Partial dichotomy |
| |||
|
goodheart |
We applied for a refi with Chase; they responded by offering to lower interest rate from 3.75 to 3.125% with the same term, no closing costs, no appraisal. We accepted. _________________________ “ What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.”— Lord Melbourne | |||
|
Member |
Since they recast the loan that tells me they have not sold it. Like to FNMA etc. And that means it’s on their balance sheet. That means they can be flexible in also modifying and reducing the rate more easily without the expense of a full blown refinance. Also by recasting you have not shortened the original term. Just freed up monthly cashflow, Assuming you don’t Continue to make payments at the original payment amount | |||
|
Green grass and high tides |
Good point EL Toro. You are correct. They told us they would not sell the loan. "Practice like you want to play in the game" | |||
|
Member |
If you run the numbers you will save more if you make the principle reduction without recasting if you continue to make the current mortgage payment AND THE BANK CREDITS YOUR PAYMENT AGAINST THE CURRENT PRINCIPLE. If it is a portfolio loan (it is, because they said so) you need to read the loan docs to know how the extra principle payments are applied. The longer the note has to run, the more money you save by not recasting. Either way you save money. Recasting is best for people to reduce their monthly payment. I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. | |||
|
Partial dichotomy |
From the previous page: https://www.investopedia.com/t...m/mortgagerecast.asp From what I've experienced, if you finance with a company that will recast it, that feature follows it if they sell it. Did with both of mine. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |