quote:

Originally posted by pbslinger:
"tactical knife" That's some scary shit

Dude.

T'were a Bench Made 940.

quote:

Originally posted by 2PAK:
In any case, the US Marshals are probably going to be permanently stationed at each SC Justice home going forward

With hookers and some fine Columbian

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Delusional and most likely psychotic.

No, just evil.

We will see when the government psychologists get a hold of him. Evil intent perhaps. Pure Evil like Joe Stalin or Hitler no. His mental state does not absolve him of personal responsibility for his actions.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
He's now been federally charged with attempted murder.

From what I read about the incident, I think it's a stretch to charge attempted murder. Any lawyer types care to weigh in?

JP

quote:

Originally posted by jprebb:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
He's now been federally charged with attempted murder.

From what I read about the incident, I think it's a stretch to charge attempted murder. Any lawyer types care to weigh in?

JP

As much as I would like the guy to fry just on principle, I was wondering the same thing to.

Seems like he essentially turned himself in before committing any “overt act”. Then admitted to having a plan or goal.

Is having the equipment and “idea” enough to really say there was an “attempt”?

He committed conspiracy to commit murder with the voices in his head.

The Communist Democrats would rather let a conservative justice be assassinated then lose this case.

They disregard the rule of law, separation of powers, and commit violence and threats of violence. Somehow they are not the threat to "our democracy". But the unarmed "insurrectionists" from Jan 6th that are rotting in jail with no bail are still a threat. Yeah, right.

quote:

Originally posted by SIGnified:
G17 and a “tactical knife and backpack” along with duct tape, zip ties, tactical flashlight, hammer and screwdriver.

That just sounds like useful EDC items to me.

From the latimes:

In the early morning hours Wednesday, Roske had said he was standing by the curb around the corner from Kavanaugh’s home in Chevy Chase, Md., and as the dispatcher gently questioned him, explained that he was in distress and had been hospitalized several times.

“I need psychiatric help. But, no, I’m not injured, if that’s what you are asking,” Roske said, adding: “Not physically.”

LINK: https://www.latimes.com/califo...ith-a-desperate-plea

quote:

Originally posted by Ironbutt:

quote:

Originally posted by SIGnified:
G17 and a “tactical knife and backpack” along with duct tape, zip ties, tactical flashlight, hammer and screwdriver.

That just sounds like useful EDC items to me.

Forgot his shovel...

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
It' important that we protect members of the Supreme Court. But more importantly, it's important that we protect our liberty. The Supreme Court is not our last defense. YOU are.

Liberty rests on the Four Boxes of Liberty:

1. Soap Box gone....conservatives (i.e., Americans) are now banned from social media, legacy media, appearing on campus, etc.

2. Ballot Box gone....rigged elections, ballot harvesting, counting of invalid ballots, allowing illegal immigrants to vote, corrupt RINOs, etc.

3. Jury Box gone...we've seen that in DC and other blue areas, there is a two-tiered justice system that is used to crush conservatives.

4. Cartridge Box...the Democrats (i.e., leftists, communists, degenerates, etc.) are desperate to take away the last box we have left, for obvious reasons.

Don't let them do it. Not one inch.

The first box. Conservatives are doing pretty well on the internet. Ben Shapiro for one is building quite the little enterprise. I believe it will be the left that will regulate social media because conservatives are reaching far more people than the legacy media. Fact. Conservatives are crushing it in print media and the internet. Yes, Trump was banned and I disagree with that decision.

Second box. There is not one bit or scrap of evidence the election was decided by provable fraud, and in the interest of the future and health of this Republic this notion needs to be abandoned. I know the left started it, but we need to finish it. What is being considered here as legitimate fraud amounts to nothing more than conspiracy theories. Get over it your side lost. This is the first step to understanding what to do to win the next time.

Jury Box. Yes, I see some of this, and as usual its confined to the deep blue areas. Don't know how to combat this. My observations are this seems to be confined to national political cases.

Cartridge Box. I see this. The left is continually attempting to disarm us. They are beginning to get creative in other ways to disarms us. Guns, ammo, primers, reloading supplies. But, I'd like to know who exactly are the "degenerates?"

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:
Second box. There is not one bit or scrap of evidence the election was decided by provable fraud, and in the interest of the future and health of this Republic this notion needs to be abandoned. I know the left started it, but we need to finish it. What is being considered here as legitimate fraud amounts to nothing more than conspiracy theories. Get over it your side lost. This is the first step to understanding what to do to win the next time.

Pretty tough to prove a case when the 'defendants' control the evidence, prohibit 'discovery', and then proclaim there's no 'provable fraud' here...

There were TWO THOUSAND MULES though...

Which side are YOU on?

Seems pretty obvious whose side he is on when its stated "Your side lost"

Did you really vote for that idiot Biden? Seriously.... if so how's that working out for you? because many of the American people are fucked

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:
Second box. There is not one bit or scrap of evidence the election was decided by provable fraud, and in the interest of the future and health of this Republic this notion needs to be abandoned. I know the left started it, but we need to finish it. What is being considered here as legitimate fraud amounts to nothing more than conspiracy theories. Get over it your side lost. This is the first step to understanding what to do to win the next time.

Pretty tough to prove a case when the 'defendants' control the evidence, prohibit 'discovery', and then proclaim there's no 'provable fraud' here...

There were TWO THOUSAND MULES though...

Which side are YOU on?

All the conservative pods I listen to view 2000 Mules as again unprovable. And, former AG Bill Barr thinks the same. What 2000 Mules tells me is that the Democrats have a much better/organized local election ground game, and if the Republicans want to win again that needs to change. I'm not interested in one particular "side." Do you want to push your party to improve, or do you want to sit back and bitch about conspiracy theories because that is the neatest explanation of defeat?

Jimbo I did not vote for Biden. I hold views that would piss off the right. I hold views that would piss of the left. I started out as a Democrat voting for Reagan. 14 years later I observed I don't have much in common with these people. So I switch to Republican. 14 years later I switch to Unaffiliated. I don't fit neatly into either ideology. I'd consider myself a classical liberal, but my voting record is overwhelmingly Republican. I'm interested in the Republicans winning future elections, and I just don't see conspiracy theories as helping in any way.

A lot of things are unprovable when they are summarily dismissed, yet they are clearly so suspicious that the only logical conclusion is they are true until a deep, honest investigation is completed.

In the case of 2000 mules, the cell location data shows thousands of individuals moving to/from certain locations in patterns and at times which defy any other explanation. There is also video of people engaged in what can only be illegal ballot harvesting.

Someone might quibble that cell location cannot place a person within inches, but that is a disingenuous deflection.

On top of that are the multitude of places where voting rules were changed contrary to various laws and the Constitution. Anyone who is honest must admit this.

Was this enough to fraudulently change the outcome? The only way to know is via thorough investigation.

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:


On top of that are the multitude of places where voting rules were changed contrary to various laws and the Constitution. Anyone who is honest must admit this.

Was this enough to fraudulently change the outcome? The only way to know is via thorough investigation.

I completely agree. Some states did change their voting laws. Ballot harvesting should not be allowed at all. And, I'm waiting to see what an investigation turns up, but I'm not holding my breath. These investigations rarely turn up anything we didn't already know. I've said elsewhere on this board 2000 Mules gives us a good place to watch for the next presidential election cycle. If the Democrats really did cheat they will do it again on a bigger scale. They can't help themselves. Then its back to box 3 again. Will the courts hold them accountable?

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:

I completely agree. Some states did change their voting laws. Ballot harvesting should not be allowed at all. And, I'm waiting to see what an investigation turns up, but I'm not holding my breath. These investigations rarely turn up anything we didn't already know. I've said elsewhere on this board 2000 Mules gives us a good place to watch for the next presidential election cycle. If the Democrats really did cheat they will do it again on a bigger scale. They can't help themselves. Then its back to box 3 again. Will the courts hold them accountable?

To be clear, many places changed rules but not laws. The Constitution requires state legislatures to set voter laws. In many places the law wasn't changed. Local election officials, state level officials, and state courts changed voting rules without the normal legislative process. All votes cast under those rules are illegal and should not be counted.

So far the courts and federal law enforcement are playing blind, deaf, and dumb.

I think most of us that didn't vote for Brandon would be satisfied and pleased if a serious investigation were conducted regardless of the conclusion.

^^^More 'evidence', a.k.a. TRUTH Right There!!!

OK no worries but you and I disagree "There is not one bit or scrap of evidence the election was decided by provable fraud" there are multiple instances of illegal ballot harvesting and voter fraud by D's. I dont thing that these are isolated incidents but only the ones that have been found.

and on the part "and in the interest of the future and health of this Republic this notion needs to be abandoned" at some level you are correct that we need to move on but I think SOMETHING organized and widespread happened, much of it was illegal (Zuckerburgs $400MM ballot harvesting scheme), preventing R poll watchers in the key cities where the election was decided etc.

But I agree R's were caught off guard and need to up their "ground game" as you say and be prepared on the spot to block these kind of tactics in real time...like a court order to allow R poll watchers in hand.

Many states have blocked the abundant ballot drop off boxes that saw overwhelmingly Democrat-vote absentee ballots. AZ has passed stronger election integrity laws...Texas, FL as well. Its a war that must be won.



"

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:
Jimbo I did not vote for Biden. I hold views that would piss off the right. I hold views that would piss of the left. I started out as a Democrat voting for Reagan. 14 years later I observed I don't have much in common with these people. So I switch to Republican. 14 years later I switch to Unaffiliated. I don't fit neatly into either ideology. I'd consider myself a classical liberal, but my voting record is overwhelmingly Republican. I'm interested in the Republicans winning future elections, and I just don't see conspiracy theories as helping in any way.

The claim has been that there was no "widespread vote fraud". That may be true, but it's a moot point. The fraud need not be "widespread" to achieve the goal--there just needs to be enough of it in a few critical places to flip the Election. I believe that is exactly what happened, and I think it could have been proven but was not allowed to be.

flashguy