quote:Originally posted by RogueJSK:quote:Originally posted by Replacement Tommel:
I think using NICs to determine who the "biggest gunmaker in the U.S." is is a flawed way to do it as it only measures civilian sales.
*sigh*
I give up.
quote:Originally posted by RogueJSK:quote:Originally posted by Replacement Tommel:
I think using NICs to determine who the "biggest gunmaker in the U.S." is is a flawed way to do it as it only measures civilian sales.
*sigh*
I give up.
quote:Originally posted by jimb888:
I'm shocked Colt isn't on there towards the top.
quote:Originally posted by RogueJSK:quote:Originally posted by jimb888:
I'm shocked Colt isn't on there towards the top.
In 2015, Colt reported producing 65,417 pistols, 1,492 revolvers, 79,565 rifles, and 0 shotguns. That's only 146,204 total firearms.
Glock made nearly 2x as many pistols as all the guns Colt produced that year. Anderson made 2x as many AR receivers as all the guns Colt made. S&W made 10x as many guns as Colt. Ruger made 11x as many guns as Colt.
Even though the ATF's data doesn't include military sales, that inclusion wouldn't have helped Colt. Colt hasn't had a contract with the military since 2012.
Colt also went bankrupt in 2015.
quote:Originally posted by RogueJSK:
I was under the impression that FN got the entire M4 contract after Remington lost it in 2013ish. But you're right. It does look like FN and Colt got a joint M4 contract in late 2015. (Perhaps a separate one?)
However, we don't know how many rifles under that contract were actually produced by Colt in 2015.
And it doesn't matter for these purposes anyway, as the ATF's data doesn't track military sales. Only LE and commercial production.