SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Colt Kodiak has caught my eye
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Colt Kodiak has caught my eye Login/Join 
Member
posted
I’ll have to see how the grips feel. Hogue rubber grips tend to rub my middle finger raw. If they come out with a 4” blued I might grab one. What I’d really love to see is a 4” blued in .41 Magnum.
From the reviews I’ve read, Colt, under the direction of CZ, has been knocking it out of the park. I sure hope that continues. The Kodiak with its unfluted cylinders is one sexy revolver.
 
Posts: 1326 | Registered: July 14, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of downtownv
posted Hide Post
quote:
Colt Kodiak

 
Posts: 9328 | Location: 18 miles long, 6 Miles at Sea | Registered: January 22, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Good looking revolver any word on price? I'd like a Python but there a few hundred above my budget.
 
Posts: 1824 | Location: USA | Registered: December 11, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shoulda Coulda
Oughta Woulda
posted Hide Post
Para should consider creating a forum section dedicated to pistols.
 
Posts: 558 | Registered: June 26, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ss9961:
Para should consider creating a forum section dedicated to pistols.



Yes, we could call it "Sig Pistols". Eek
 
Posts: 23529 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ss9961:
Para should consider creating a forum section dedicated to pistols.
Yeah, but this isn’t a pistol, it’s a revolver. Eek
 
Posts: 7378 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by slosig:
quote:
Originally posted by ss9961:
Para should consider creating a forum section dedicated to pistols.
Yeah, but this isn’t a pistol, it’s a revolver. Eek


Yeah but we are an inclusive bunch. Smile
 
Posts: 23529 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
$1599 So, $100 more than the Python. Real world prices might come down in time. I’m pretty sure it was released at the 2025 Shot Show.
 
Posts: 1326 | Registered: July 14, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 400m:
$1599 So, $100 more than the Python. Real world prices might come down in time. I’m pretty sure it was released at the 2025 Shot Show.


I can't afford a Python so I won't be adding a Kodiak to the stable either :-(

This message has been edited. Last edited by: calugo,
 
Posts: 1824 | Location: USA | Registered: December 11, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Only the strong survive
Picture of 41
posted Hide Post
I bought mine in 1966 to shoot bullseye matches. Unique in its own way, but I still like S&W because of the different accessories available.

I had a friend in PA that shot bullseye for over 50 years.

I think every police officer should shoot bullseye since you are shooting against yourself and it builds confidence.


41
 
Posts: 12006 | Location: Herndon, VA | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Smarter than the
average bear
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by slosig:
quote:
Originally posted by ss9961:
Para should consider creating a forum section dedicated to pistols.
Yeah, but this isn’t a pistol, it’s a revolver. Eek


When did this bullshit about a revolver not being a pistol start? Anyone know the origin of this?

Single shot flintlocks certainly were called pistols, so a pistol isn’t necessarily a semi-auto. When, why, and how did this all start?

Is this like magazines aren’t clips, but some people don’t realize that some firearms actually had/have clips? People being too clever for their own good?
 
Posts: 3585 | Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana | Registered: June 20, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of John Steed
posted Hide Post
"When did this bullshit about a revolver not being a pistol start? Anyone know the origin of this?"

Samuel Colt called his invention a "revolving pistol". So he thought it is a pistol.

I think the US Army had something to do with starting (or at least abetting) making a distinction between the two when it published "Pistols and Revolvers".

The definition they followed (I believe) is:
If the chamber and barrel are one unit, it's a pistol.
If the barrel is separate from the revolving cylinder containing multiple chambers, it's a revolver.



... stirred anti-clockwise.
 
Posts: 2261 | Location: Michigan | Registered: May 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Master-at-Arms
Picture of apf383
posted Hide Post
Sweet!!!



Foster's, Australian for Bud

 
Posts: 7553 | Location: Stuck in NY, FUAC  | Registered: November 22, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I held one at Shot and subsequently purchased one.
I was looking at the crown and made a remark about it. The engineer that designed it was standing there and explained it to me. I was shocked that the engineer was so approachable but then again it is Shot.
I have not put a round through it yet.


__________________________
Keep your rotor in the green
The aircraft in trim
Your time over target short
Make it count
 
Posts: 1442 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: November 09, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by alreadydead:
I have not put a round through it yet.

Now that takes will power!
 
Posts: 1326 | Registered: July 14, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Main Thing Is
Not To Get Excited
Picture of wishfull thinker
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by John Steed:

"When did this bullshit about a revolver not being a pistol start? Anyone know the origin of this?"

snip!



I agree with your sentiment in spades!!! And now I'll see your gripe and raise you. I'm a little older than average here and have seen and heard a lot of things and watched as they changed over... I dunno, 65 years or so?

revolver-pistol distinction is a distinction that doesn't matter in the walking around everyday. As only one example, my father was a career Marine and shot both service and civilian PISTOL matches until he retired on 30 and just quit shooting. In that time I hung out in the garage or the back yard depending on where we lived as he and his buddies worked up their loads. All Marines, all career types, all WWII veterans.

They routinely referred to revolvers as pistols; after all, they were prepping for a 'pistol match". A pistol could be either, with a revolver being more definitive but nobody ever jumped down anybody's throat. The square thingy that holds bullets for the .45's were universally referred to as clips. Also no 'corrections'.
I went in the Marines sometime later, on the range we used 'clips' or magazines interchangeably. None of the instructors seemed to need medication after hearing that. My last USMC match and my last USMC (R) match featured .45 CLIPS.


_______________________

 
Posts: 6639 | Location: Washington | Registered: November 06, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Victim of Life's
Circumstances
Picture of doublesharp
posted Hide Post
Reminds me of an L frame Smith like a 686.

Colts are slick but I like S&W .44mags best.

4 screw pre 29 w coke grips


29-2 with a miracle coating - says it can lie on the ocean floor for 6 months w/no damage.


629-4 6"


________________________
God spelled backwards is dog
 
Posts: 4922 | Location: Sunnyside of Louisville | Registered: July 04, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Only the strong survive
Picture of 41
posted Hide Post
In Sept 67, a person walked into the gunshop and traded a M29 for some moulds and a lead pot. He looked like some guy from MT or WY.

That night I couldn't sleep thinking it would be gone before I could get back. So the next morning I was there early and asked about it. The owner got it out and said $90. Little did I know at the time but it was a custom. Back then, Smith & Wesson would make any barrel length in 1/8 increments. So it was made in 1957, has a 5 inch barrel and the trigger had a tit on the back side as a trigger stop.

It wasn't until the '90's that I found out it was a custom. It also came with a nice Eubanks holster.


41
 
Posts: 12006 | Location: Herndon, VA | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Yeah, I’ve had the same issue with Hogue grips rubbing my middle finger after a while, so I usually go for something a bit softer or more ergonomic. A 4” blued .41 Magnum would be awesome, and I’m hoping Colt keeps up the momentum with quality under CZ’s direction. I’ve been impressed with the recent models, and the Kodiak looks great—those unfluted cylinders really give it a sleek, aggressive vibe. Definitely a revolver worth considering if they keep making them like this.


___________________________________________________

in the 'Merica Navy they teach you to go pew pew pew...
Luckily in the PNW they taught me to go BANG BANG BANG
 
Posts: 132 | Registered: November 02, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by doublesharp:
4 screw pre 29 w coke grips
DANG!!! That is Beautiful!
 
Posts: 7378 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Colt Kodiak has caught my eye

© SIGforum 2025