Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
France I believe only uses low enriched uranium (LEU), versus the US, which uses highly enriched uranium (HEU). HEU is necessary for weapons whereas, LEU doesn't have the dual-usage security concerns. The flip-side is you can get much longer usage from HEU cores, thus core changes are much more frequent with French reactors. I'm not sure what France does with their nuclear energy that the US doesn't already do with regards to safety. One of the complaints that I've heard is US DOE and its regulatory agencies, makes innovation very restrictive, stiffling new ideas and burying progressive developments with overbearing administrative bureaucracy. I've heard lots of talk about utilizing Thorium and other source types, however much of the decision makers seem to be locked-in their beliefs that nuclear energy can only come from pressurized water reactors. | |||
|
Partial dichotomy |
| |||
|
Legalize the Constitution |
My sense is, “yes, it is and should be given serious consideration.” Really though, I just wish all forms of energy generation could be debated on equal footing, the pros and cons of each debated openly without the heavy finger on the scales by the federal government. As Michael Shellenberger said in the video I posted yesterday, “We need evidence-based policy making, not policy-based evidence making.” No truer words. _______________________________________________________ despite them | |||
|
Back, and to the left |
Right on down to the consumer level: | |||
|
No More Mr. Nice Guy |
Every energy source had a negative environmental impact. The question is not if it is green, but in which ways is it not. Today CO2 is the declared enemy that is going to extinguish life. So the obvious answer is nuclear. There are smart ways to implement it which greatly diminish the risks. | |||
|
Member |
Most French reactors are PWRs, like most US reactors, and I’m sure run on pretty much the same enrichment (max 5% U-235). Every US commercial power reactor is limited to 5% enrichment. The only US reactors running highly enriched uranium are those operated by the Navy and some test and research reactors. Also, not sure where this huge under the mountain nuke waste depot is in the US. If you’re talking about Yucca Mountain, that never opened. Pretty much all spent nuclear fuel from US power reactors is stored on site, in spent fuel pools, and in above ground dry storage containers sitting on the plant site. | |||
|
goodheart |
Yucca Mountain never happened because of NV political opposition, not because of any technical issues--IIRC. _________________________ “Remember, remember the fifth of November!" | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |