SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Has anyone ever successfully pulled off the "quantity for quality" tradeoff with firearms?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Has anyone ever successfully pulled off the "quantity for quality" tradeoff with firearms? Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TomV:
Depending on how the sale(s) are done, do you have to have any concerns with ATF of selling too many as an "Unlicensed Dealer" ?


Whether direct or consignment, I'd go through an FFL. It's required for handguns in MN as of a year ago.
 
Posts: 9095 | Location: The Red part of Minnesota | Registered: October 06, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
My other Sig
is a Steyr.
Picture of .38supersig
posted Hide Post
I haven't.

The common 'nothing special' things of today seem to get tied up in nostalgia and become something special eventually.

There are a lot of hohum guns I bought years ago are some that I couldn't possibly afford now.



 
Posts: 9529 | Location: Somewhere looking for ammo that nobody has at a place I haven't been to for a pistol I couldn't live without... | Registered: December 02, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
come and take it
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pace40:
Always wanted a Wilson Combat 1911 but could never bring myself to drop all that change for one. Fast forward to last year when one day I'm staring into the safe looking at all the guns that I don't shoot and mean really nothing to me. I picked out 6 or 7 that I was willing to get rid of and traded (along with a little cash) for a Wilson CQB Elite. One year later (a couple weeks ago) I did it again for a 2-tone CQB this time. Yea the safe is a dozen guns lighter with empty spots but I've put more rounds through those Wilsons, while really enjoying them, in the last 14 months than through those dozen guns in the last 14 years. Zero regrets.


When I saw the title of this post I immediately thought about my grail gun a Wilson Combat 1911. I look at Wilson's and think they are too expensive, but look in my safe and see too many mediocre guns that could be traded into what I really want. I really should trade into a Wilson 1911!

Our family only has one thing of my great grandfather's. It's a nickel plated Colt Peacemaker. If I'm going to have a collection, then I ought to have something really nice in it.




I have a few SIGs.
 
Posts: 1979 | Location: Texan north of the Red River | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Quit staring at my wife's Butt
Picture of XLT
posted Hide Post
I have sold mine off a few times, mainly I was into glocks sigs, colts, hk, browning hp e.t.c only one I ever regretted was a hkp7m8 chantilly anniversary with the walnut box and coin. the rest not a big deal, if I don't shoot it I don't keep it.
 
Posts: 5713 | Registered: February 09, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
When I decided to thin the herd, I had great results with a local auction house that specializes in guns. Yes take 20% off for sellers premium, but they advertise nationwide and get top dollar for all the items, much more than most. Guns I paid $300 for sold for 2 grand, so even with 400 off I made 1300 bucks on a single gun, and this for me has been typical. I decided years ago trying to amass a collection was not worth my time. I have very nice guns ( not super top end mond you) and in the case of my “working guns” - guns I use for various shooting sports or defensive use have a spare identical or similar gun as back up. With that about 20 pistols is plenty and about half as many long guns
 
Posts: 3436 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ibanda:
I really should trade into a Wilson 1911!


Pretty sure you wouldn't regret it either. Smile


____________
Pace
 
Posts: 861 | Location: in the PA woods | Registered: March 11, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
IMO it depends on your definition of "quality" and your use case.

Quite a few comments about unfired guns in this thread. If you're not going to use it, and are just owning it for the purpose of having something nice to look at, selling off a few lesser guns to get something really nice makes sense.

When it comes to performance, though, there are diminishing returns after a certain point. Unreliable junk is obviously a waste of money, but I doubt my targets would look much different if I was shooting a $5000 Nighthawk compared to my ~$1000 Springfield. It definitely wouldn't be 5x better!

I like some variety in my collection...both to fill specific practical roles and for fun. I've got between 50 and 100 guns right now, and while only a handful get carried regularly, all of them get shot at least a couple of times a year. It's nothing really fancy...just good utilitarian reliable stuff (Sig, Beretta, Smith & Wesson, Ruger, Marlin, etc.). If I can't count on it I get rid of it. At this point my practical needs are pretty well covered, and I get more enjoyment out of playing with the wider variety of toys than I would trading them for a couple of really high end pieces that I'd be afraid to use.
 
Posts: 9551 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Page late and a dollar short
posted Hide Post
Well I just did that with a Gen 3 Glock 19 that hasn’t been out of the house in probably sixteen years. I traded it at work for a low production S&W Model 60-3 that came into the store.

In fact my wife said “You’re getting rid of something?”


-------------------------------------——————
————————--Ignorance is a powerful tool if applied at the right time, even, usually, surpassing knowledge(E.J.Potter, A.K.A. The Michigan Madman)
 
Posts: 8498 | Location: Livingston County Michigan USA | Registered: August 11, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Has anyone ever successfully pulled off the "quantity for quality" tradeoff with firearms?

© SIGforum 2024