SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Are ionization smoke detectors still necessary?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Are ionization smoke detectors still necessary? Login/Join 
Striker in waiting
Picture of BurtonRW
posted
I’m in the process of updating my household smoke and CO detectors. Always thought that dual-sensor detectors (by which I mean photoelectric and ionization, not smoke & CO combo units) were the gold standard, but it seems that ionization detectors are largely being abandoned.

First Alert and Kidde at least still make a couple (although none battery powered & interconnected), but X-Sense doesn’t even bother with ionization anymore.

Curious if anyone has any insight here. Am I good with just modern photoelectric units? All informed opinions (industry professionals and firefighters, especially) are welcome.

I know what NFPA and my state building codes say, I know the difference between the two sensor types and how they work. And of course, the best detector is the one that’s installed and functional - just like a carry gun. I’m mostly just curious at this point.

Thanks.

-Rob




I predict that there will be many suggestions and statements about the law made here, and some of them will be spectacularly wrong. - jhe888

A=A
 
Posts: 16451 | Location: Maryland, AA Co. | Registered: March 16, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I just ripped out my Kidde smoke detectors and replaced them with First ALERT.

The Kidde detectors were always going off for no reason.

I wanted 10-year batteries and hard-wired, so my choices were limited.

I have not had a false alarm since.
 
Posts: 5174 | Registered: February 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 4MUL8R
posted Hide Post
I am constrained to use Simplisafe items so I have no choice. If you want more than noise, meaning a monitored system, you will enjoy more protection.


-------
Trying to simplify my life...
 
Posts: 6326 | Location: Commonwealth of Virginia | Registered: January 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Honky Lips
Picture of FenderBender
posted Hide Post
NFPA says combo detectors are best.

https://www.nfpa.org/news-blog...etector-should-i-buy


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
 
Posts: 9568 | Location: Great Basin | Registered: July 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Seeker of Clarity
Picture of r0gue
posted Hide Post
I've been thinking about swapping all mine out. This was informative.

 
Posts: 11867 | Registered: August 02, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No, not like
Bill Clinton
Picture of BigSwede
posted Hide Post
I probably need to change out mine that are 20 years old now. How do I know if they are linked?


 
Posts: 7060 | Location: GA | Registered: September 23, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
quote:
How do I know if they are linked?

Push the test button on one and see if they all go off.

Plan accordingly with pets and spouses.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 13712 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Was that you
or the dog?
Picture of SHOOTIN BLANKS
posted Hide Post
Something to consider is that current code requires a detector in each bedroom in new construction. This is in response to the increase in electronics in the bedroom. The last time I reworked my system I added these and we try to keep the doors closed when possible.


___________________________
"Opinions vary" -Dalton
 
Posts: 1774 | Location: PA | Registered: February 11, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Are ionization smoke detectors still necessary?

© SIGforum 2026