quote:

Originally posted by lkdr1989:
Just do an internet search on "chelsea clinton used clinton foundation to pay for wedding"...par for course.

Which buggers the question why these criminals are never charged.

Her only claim to fame is that she is the spawn of two criminals. One a serial rapist, the other a traitor. She can run her soup cooler all she wants. Daddy says she's the best at it.

In the haunted face of Chelsea Clinton, we see the turmoil Weinstein has inflicted on the Clinton Machine

Hillary Clinton will never let on any doubts about the damage Harvey Weinstein has done to her career, her husband’s image, or the prospects for the political machine of hangers on, funders, and operatives. The designated successor is her daughter Chelsea, who, whatever her other merits, is not nearly as good a congenital liar as her mother, much less Bill Clinton.

So, when the UK Daily Mail ambushed her at Northeastern University attending a Clinton Global Initiative University event and asked her if the Clinton Foundation would return the $100,000 it received from Weinstein, she fled.

This close up of Chelsea’s face is indicative of someone who does not have confidence in the plan going forward....



http://www.americanthinker.com...clinton_machine.html

Even if they lied about it, which is probably the reality of the situation, they could say they would donate that money to any kind of organization that fights abuse of women. But noooooo...they can't think past their own greed and constantly stay 6 moves behind on the chess board. They're more transparent than Saran Wrap...

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
Her only claim to fame is that she is the spawn of two criminals. One a serial rapist, the other a traitor. She can run her soup cooler all she wants. Daddy says she's the best at it.

AFAIK, Web Hubble wasn't a rapist. Criminal - of course, but not a rapist.

He's her father, not bill.

It's a question that never even needed to be asked. Everybody already knew the answer.

Even IF the Clintons donated the money to a charity they would donate the money to a charity run by their allies, thus buying influence.

It's similar to a criminal saying, "Yes, I have dirty money, but I'm planning on spending it."

quote:

Originally posted by Fenris:
Even IF the Clintons donated the money to a charity they would donate the money to a charity run by their allies, thus buying influence. ...

Even if it was donated to a "charity" it would be repeatedly re-donated till a bloodhound couldn't follow the trail, let alone some feckless government agency that wasn't interested in discovering the truth anyway.

She should give the money to charity instead of Harvey. It will help fund his defense. All of his recipients should. Bankrupt him.
As for Chelsea she's learning how to be a criminal everyday. What a scowl on that face.

She will turn out to be twice the scum of a piece of human flesh of her mother and father combined.

What a stupid ass question.

I've got no love for the Clintons, but seriously, that's the dumbest question I've ever heard, and just walking away is probably the best move. If you keep his money, it will be claimed you support him. If you return it, you're giving money to him. Say he gave $100k to the NRA, what would you have them do with it?

I normally give past & present Presidents kids a free pass & Chelsea was no different. She was an incredibly homely kid & with slease bag parents like hers, I figured the poor kid never had a chance.

Since she's grown up now & out on her own, I can see that I was wrong & that she has no redeeming social value whatsoever.

Lets see. A defacto criminal/creep gives me a $100K payoff/bribe. The criminal/creep is exposed. To return the money would give him more resources to be a creep. So I will keep the money for my own corrupt activities, and call myself honorable.

quote:

Originally posted by DaBigBR:
What a stupid ass question.

I've got no love for the Clintons, but seriously, that's the dumbest question I've ever heard, and just walking away is probably the best move. If you keep his money, it will be claimed you support him. If you return it, you're giving money to him. Say he gave $100k to the NRA, what would you have them do with it?

It's not a stupid question at all and one even a low IQ moron should have been able to address. The answer is ridiculously simple. Make a public spectacle out of condemning Weinstein and donate 'all' monies received from him to a couple women's counseling groups that deal with abused women. You've taken a position most of the country will support, and the money is gone. Issue diffused, and you get away from it. Sneaking out a side door and running away to avoid addressing the issue shows this lowlife moron to be exactly who and what she...Her mother's daughter.

"Was this the face that launch'd a thousand shits?"

Bidgeal:

Good answer.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Hillary Clinton will never let on any doubts about the damage Harvey Weinstein has done to...her husband’s image...

LOL

Hey Chelsea...





https://twitter.com/MonicaLewi...s/919732300862181377

Clinton Foundation to keep Harvey Weinstein's $250,000 donation

The Clinton Foundation will not return as much as $250,000 in donations from disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein following the accusations of sexual harassment and rape.

The foundation said Sunday that donations, ranging from $100,000 to $250,000, have already been spent on projects, The Daily Mail reported.

The move to keep the money was expected following tweets from the foundation’s spokesman Craig Minassian.

“Suggesting @ClintonFdn return funds from our 330,000+ donors ignores the fact that donations have been used to help people across the world,” Minassian wrote on Twitter.

The calls to return Weinstein’s money were prompted after multiple actresses have come forward and accused the Hollywood executive of sexual assault and rape, forcing numerous politicians and organization to grapple with the dilemma.

Dozens Democratic Party politicians – including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Sen. Sen. Al Franken, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Sen. Cory Booker – have pledged to donate their Weinstein’s contributions to charities focused on women’s rights.

Hillary Clinton echoed her former colleagues, saying she was “shocked and appalled” after the sexual harassment allegations were revealed about Weinstein, who hosted fundraisers for her in the past and donated more than $46,000 to her recent presidential campaign and other election efforts.

"What other people are saying, what my former colleagues are saying, is they're going to donate it to charity, and of course I will do that," she said on CNN. "I give 10% of my income to charity every year, this will be part of that. There's no – there's no doubt about it."

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...250000-donation.html