SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Is that idiot Biden gonna get us in a war with Russia or China?
Page 1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 193
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Is that idiot Biden gonna get us in a war with Russia or China? Login/Join 
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sdy:
years ??


Yes, years. This war has been going on since 2014 already.
 
Posts: 33210 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Modern Day Savage:
If his analysis is accurate, this war is very much one of Russia's last-ditch attempts at survival as a sovereign nation and as a culture.

You could argue it's the last-ditch attempt to prove that Stalinism can solve Russia's problems instead. The Russians' great failure (IMHO) is not developing themselves economically and socially from the grass-roots up. The all-powerful state has long had to ensure that it's the only one allowed to make decisions or take credit for success - and that, I believe, is what's actually at stake in Russia.

Now, how does Putin dress that up in 21st century Russia? By claiming it's a crisis, and that it's necessary to preserve the culture and the population that the Soviets spent generations driving towards oblivion.
 
Posts: 27305 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
quote:
Originally posted by sdy:
years ??


Yes, years. This war has been going on since 2014 already.


Yep

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_of_Dignity


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 34456 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
quote:
Originally posted by Modern Day Savage:
If his analysis is accurate, this war is very much one of Russia's last-ditch attempts at survival as a sovereign nation and as a culture.

You could argue it's the last-ditch attempt to prove that Stalinism can solve Russia's problems instead. The Russians' great failure (IMHO) is not developing themselves economically and socially from the grass-roots up. The all-powerful state has long had to ensure that it's the only one allowed to make decisions or take credit for success - and that, I believe, is what's actually at stake in Russia.

Now, how does Putin dress that up in 21st century Russia? By claiming it's a crisis, and that it's necessary to preserve the culture and the population that the Soviets spent generations driving towards oblivion.


President Putin has made comments over the years praising some Soviet Communist leaders while criticizing others. I'm not so sure he is an ideologically committed Communist so much as a commonplace Statist totalitarian dictator. He appears to be perfectly fine with crony capitalism... as long as he gets his cut of the corruption 'windfall' siphoned off the (ignorant) public's trust, while maintaining an iron grip on absolute control of power, with an eye towards restablishing a Russian empire as the best strategy to achieve perceived security and dominance.

I've heard some analysts compare him and his plans for Russia more towards being a Czarist than a Communist, although he most definitely grew up exposed to the Soviet Communist mentality and system of government.

To be clear, I'm not, in any way, justifying Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It's bad, it's wrong, it affects the world and...AFAIC, it must be stopped at all costs, with whatever resources are needed.

No doubt that President Putin has crafted/ fabricated justifications for the invasion, but the Zeihan analysis seems to give the deeper underlying unspoken reasons for President Putin's decision to invade now.

I just like to have as clear a picture as possible for why an opponent (anyone really) makes the decisions they do.
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Modern Day Savage:
President Putin has actually made comments over the years praising some Soviet Communist leaders while criticizing others. I'm not so sure he is an ideologically committed Communist so much as a commonplace Statist totalitarian dictator. He appears to be perfectly fine with crony capitalism... as long as he gets his cut of the corruption 'windfall' siphoned off the (ignorant) public's trust, while maintaining an iron grip on absolute control of power, with an eye towards restablishing a Russian empire and dominance.

There's very few in Russian government, let alone the people themselves, that want communism back. They wishfully lament how things actually functioned and how people were held accountable but, what they really are saying is things today are too complicated and its all because of >insert boogeymen<, with an arrow pointing to 'its the west's fault'.

Culturally, Russia has always had strongman in-charge; voting, consensus-by-committee, blyat! They're the model for the phrase, be careful what you wish for when people complain about finding a replacement for the current jerk in-charge. For all the emphasis on the classic arts, engineering, and bureaucracy, there's a constant fall back to the Eastern methods of one tough-guy, his henchmen who enforce & benefit, meanwhile, the people hope there's a benevolent bone amongst them.

quote:
I just like to have as clear a picture as possible for why an opponent (anyone really) makes the decisions they do.

We can parse it out any number of ways, the reality is, Russia has problems both in how it functions as a gov and how they culturally view things. The below commentary piece gives some insight into this, take a read, there's a few other nuggets I didn't include.

Ukrainians Don't Blame Just Putin For the War. They Blame Russians.
quote:
...

The next morning, we waited in the Vienna Coffee House for Yaroslav Hrytsak, a history professor at Ukrainian Catholic University and prominent intellectual, the author of the bestselling Global History of Ukraine. When Hrytsak arrived, he sat across from us, adjusting his chair as if preparing to deliver a lecture. His mask, which he’d pulled beneath his chin, served as a hammock for his ample, grey beard. “This coffee house,” he announced, “is the oldest in Lviv.” He held his index finger to the bridge of his nose. “It is worth noting that the oldest coffee house in Lviv is named the Vienna Coffee House, while the oldest coffee house in Vienna is named the Lviv Coffee House. That is a good first lesson in eastern European politics and culture.”

Hrytsak, like Andrii, believed it wasn’t possible to decouple the war in Ukraine from the Russian people. When I asked if he could explain why, he peered over his reading glasses and took a breath; it was as if I’d arrived in the last fifteen minutes of a three-hour movie and asked him what it was about. With patience, he replied: “No one feels Russian identity more than Ukrainians. You see, the Russian identity is a spiritual one, in which Russia believes it is the savior of the world.” When I asked what Russia had to save the world from, Hrytsak replied, “The West, of course. Right now, Putin isn’t fighting Ukraine. Remember, he’s fighting Nazis and Nazism is synonymous with the West. In Putin’s mind Ukraine does not exist; it is a fiction, a creation of the West, one he must destroy. Embedded in Russian identity is a belief that it has a special mission to fight the West. From Napoleon to Hitler, Russia is the one that saves the world from the West and its depraved fascist tendencies. Russia defeated Napoleon. Russia defeated Hitler. And Putin will defeat Obama and Biden.”

“Obama?” Matt asked. “He’s not even in office.”

“As I said, this isn’t a rational war, it is a spiritual one.” Hrytsak sipped his coffee, gathering his thoughts before he continued, “Over five hundred years there have been many attempts to emancipate Russian society. Every attempt collapses with a ruthless autocrat. Why do the Russian people choose unfreedom? The answer is Russian culture. If Russia is indeed the savior of the world, that would mean its suffering has meaning, that its suffering is synonymous with its piety. That’s why the sanctions won’t work. Could you convince a Christian to become godless by making him suffer? No, of course not, his suffering only draws him closer to God. Russia has enjoyed periods of freedom, but always it returns to this condition of suffering. It’s important to understand that it’s not Putin who took Russia, but rather Russia which gave itself to Putin, and Putin has used Russia’s history of suffering to consolidate his power.”

Hrytsak folded his arms. “This city has been Austro-Hungarian, Polish, and Russian. The Poles in particular have a very strong claim on Lviv, but their culture is different than Russia’s. They have the ability to rethink the past, while Russian culture has a tendency to relive the past. In the one case, it’s like driving car with a small rearview mirror you can reference. In the other case, it’s like driving a car with your windshield coated in mud. All you can do is look out the back window.”

The Third World War, according to Hrytsak, had already begun. Russia, like Germany at the end of the First World War, had suffered a humiliating defeat at the end of the Cold War. He used the term “Weimar” to describe Russia’s post-Cold War government in the 1990s. He noted how Putin, like Hitler, mined nuggets of grievance out of a selective, flawed interpretation of history, then refined those grievances into political power, enough power to sell this narrative we were seeing now, one in which Russia would liberate brother Ukrainians from their Nazi government led by a Jewish president. “We don’t like being called brothers,” Hrytsak said, “by people who murder us.”

When I asked Hrytsak what, if anything, could break this spell, he explained, “The Russian people have made a bargain with Putin, and it’s one they’ve made throughout their history. They have allowed a despot to take away their freedom, but in exchange he has offered them glory.”

....
 
Posts: 15125 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
Listening to a podcast on the whole affair earlier this week or late last. On the points about rational actions the West could and should take, the issue of war crimes came up along with the suddenly popular trend of attributing responsibilities for those directly on Putin personally.

The discussion was that while individuals perpetrating these should 100% be prosecuted, assigning the label "War Criminal" to Putin, especially if it included any sort of actual criminal charges by international community, would be a tremendous mistake since it further isolated him and made him even more volatile/dangerous/unpredictable in his seemingly total control environment.

The examples included the inability of him to even engage in diplomatic or economic meetings and processes outside of Russia for fear of being arrested wherever he happened to go for these charges.

Interesting thoughts.

Oh, of course, that night was when I saw the headline that earlier in the day Biden had declared Putin a war criminal. Not sure those were his actual words, but I'm sure it was close.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 12788 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
I’m not attempting to begin to follow all the debates—some informed, some not—about Putin’s status as a war criminal, and especially not the wisdom of publicly acknowledging what he is.

As a point of history, though, it should be recognized that most of those who have been convicted of the charge were not the ones who got their hands bloody by personally committing the acts themselves. Some like Japanese general Homma were convicted basically for allowing crimes to happen under his command, but Putin’s guilt is similar to that of the highest ranking members of the Nazi regime. His directly-ordered action of invading Ukraine without justification was no different than if I had deliberately conspired with and armed a friend to break into my neighbor’s house, murder some of the occupants, and take up unwelcome residence among the survivors. No civilized person would consider that to be anything other than the most heinous of crimes.

Anyone who is confused about the subject of war crimes should educate themselves with a bit of history. It isn’t necessary to wield the katana or pull the trigger oneself to be guilty of the crime. And although it is undeniable that most who have committed war crimes were never so much as charged, often for political reasons, that does not mean they weren’t guilty.




6.4/93.6
“Cet animal est très méchant, quand on l’attaque il se défend.”
 
Posts: 47788 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
Borodyanka another town destroyed

video at

https://twitter.com/i/status/1511663552041525253

https://hotair.com/allahpundit...e-new-horror-n460522

“The destruction in the centre of Borodyanka is the worst for its size I have seen in any of the towns around Kyiv, including Irpin and Bucha, which were much fought over,” wrote the BBC’s Ukraine war correspondent, Jeremy Bowen, during a visit to the town. Residents are telling him that the damage to apartment buildings was no accident, as those buildings were being targeted on the ground too. And when residents tried digging out survivors from the rubble, they were warned to stop — or else.

The air attacks on the apartment buildings appear to have been deliberate. The Russian air force has mostly used “dumb bombs” during the war instead of precision guided munitions for reasons that remain not fully clear, but one woman who was in Borodyanka during an air attack made it sound as though the damage couldn’t have been accidental. “We were sitting in the cellar,” she told the Times. “The plane flew very low. I counted three seconds and the bomb fell.” How likely is it that a low-flying Russian jet would have mistaken a target as large as an apartment building?

And what “military targets” were they supposedly after in a town as small (13,000) as Borodyanka, anyway? Russia will probably resort to its old excuse that they thought the Ukrainian military was using the building as a base, which is convenient since it allows them to attack any civilian target with impunity.



 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
long long article w lots of pics

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne...onvoy-near-Kyiv.html

Incredible moment single Ukrainian tank takes on entire Russian convoy, destroying multiple armoured vehicles near Kyiv – but NATO chief warns that Putin has NOT lost his appetite to control the WHOLE country


much more covered than the title would indicate
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Power is nothing
without control
posted Hide Post
I'm not ignorant of the massive cost in human life that this war is causing, but I can't help finding it interesting in an academic sense. There is lots of very interesting stuff happening tactically, strategically, and politically. The vulnerability of armor and close air support when your opponent has access to even just man-portable systems is being demonstrated viscerally. The use of drones for situational awareness and forward observation being effective against a enemy with modern capabilities. Hell, the media and information warfare is evolving faster than ever. We all thought the next war would involve lots of cyber attacks, but instead we got hotlines you can call to see if the enemy has killed your son. Then there is the impact that India and China are having just by sitting there and not doing anything one way or the other.

I despise what is happening, but in a detached way it is terribly interesting.

- Bret
 
Posts: 2476 | Location: OH | Registered: March 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sadlerbw:
The use of drones for situational awareness and forward observation being effective against a enemy with modern capabilities.


I was just having that discussion this morning.

Ukrainian artillery has been making widespread use of forward observation drones in this conflict. Rather than relying on human forward observers phoning in adjustments, artillery units themselves are able to get real-time birds-eye views of the enemy's current position and movements along with their rounds' impacts, in order to more accurately adjust fire and more effectively engage mobile enemy forces.

I think this is going to quicken the widespread utilization of individual observation drones at the small unit level (as opposed to large recon drones loitering overhead, or attack drones making airstrikes), as well as result in a new emphasis on developing and fielding man-portable anti-drone technology.
 
Posts: 33210 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
If Russia wants win bad enough, they can beat them, then they get to rule over ruin.

Then they will be fighting a never ending insurgency of destroyed pipelines.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 34456 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sadlerbw:
I'm not ignorant of the massive cost in human life that this war is causing, but I can't help finding it interesting in an academic sense. There is lots of very interesting stuff happening tactically, strategically, and politically...

Yep. Fascinating. In the era of the internet, arm-chair-quartebacking can be fun!



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24720 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
I’m not attempting to begin to follow all the debates—some informed, some not—about Putin’s status as a war criminal, and especially not the wisdom of publicly acknowledging what he is.

Unfortunately, in this current-age of media-entertainment, where we're inundated with police/legal procedurals, medical ethics dramas and political battle ground series', the narrative is to find a moralistic high-ground and highlight the outrage. I'm not attempting to down-play 'war crimes', however there is a pre-occupation towards finding some legal standing, while overlooking the fact that, there's still a war going on, and none of these accusations are going to amount to much until peace is secured. As one military commenter noted, there's a lot of talk about sanctions and charges but, not a lot of talk about finding peace.
quote:
Originally posted by sadlerbw:
I'm not ignorant of the massive cost in human life that this war is causing, but I can't help finding it interesting in an academic sense. There is lots of very interesting stuff happening tactically, strategically, and politically.

This is what happens when the public at-large, hasn't ever served in the military, let alone know of anyone who has. Its fascinating because its an area that most people aren't familiar with, and the decisions are for keeps, lives are lost and technology is at the forefront just as much as human will.
quote:
The vulnerability of armor and close air support when your opponent has access to even just man-portable systems is being demonstrated viscerally.

This is nothing new, the scales of advantage rock back n'forth as technology evolves. The Yom Kippur war in '73 was the advent of anti-tank missile systems, where a lone infantryman, from a stand-off range, could eliminate a tank. Prior to, that infantryman had to get very close to a tank in order to disable it; today's weapons, you can not only mission kill it, but destroy it.
quote:
The use of drones for situational awareness and forward observation being effective against a enemy with modern capabilities.

Drones have been used for quite a long time. In '91 Desert Storm, US battleships were using Pioneer drones launched off the stern to do spotting for the big 16" guns ashore, the opening air phase of Desert Storm, nearly all USAF & USN drones used for air training, were used instead to expose Iraqi SAM sites. I get what you're saying, drone usage and capabilities are now down to the squad level, and the ability to communicate and bring fires is scary...and impressive.
 
Posts: 15125 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of pulicords
posted Hide Post
Last night I listened to this podcast interview by Megyn Kelly of Gary Kasparov (the Russian Chess Grand Master), who clearly is well informed and willing to address Putin's rise to power, intentions, and actions to the degree he's apparently on the dictator's hit list. If only we had leaders with the intellect and knowledge of Mr. Kasparov in office or (at a minimum) listened to them. Putin's mindset is power and attempting to deal with him from anything other than a position of power is futile. Not a long interview, but incredibly informative:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/...6305?i=1000556454236


"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."
 
Posts: 10279 | Location: The Free State of Arizona | Registered: June 13, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The 'Pivot to the Pacific' was 10 years ago, all uniformed services know who the big-threat is yet, somehow, the Army didn't think it was a good idea to evolve their principal man-portable anti-air weapon(?)
I get it, updates continue to make the Stinger relevant however, the opening phases of any war, you tend to expend your stocks, resupply is surged in, however there's nothing behind it.

Supplying Ukraine with current stocks, with nothing available to replace it, strikes me as not so good planning. Too much chasing shiny objects, and over reliance on existing airpower, and not enough focus on the back-end.
No easy answer for ramping up Stinger production, Pentagon No. 2 says
quote:
LOS ANGELES: Obsolete parts and workforce issues are presenting a problem for the United States as it considers ramping up production of the shoulder mounted Stinger anti-aircraft system in order to surge weapons for Ukraine and replenish US stocks, the Pentagon’s No. 2 official said Tuesday.

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February, US and NATO-provided munitions such as the Raytheon-made Stinger have been integral for Ukrainian forces as they attempt to retain control of their airspace against the larger, better equipped Russian military.

However, lawmakers’ concerns about the US military’s own dwindling stockpile has raised questions about how best to replenish the munitions — questions that Deputy Secretary Kathleen Hicks said the Pentagon is still in the process of figuring out how to resolve, particularly with regard to Stinger.

“There are some very specific issues with regard to Stinger and some obsolescence issues that we have to overcome,” Hicks told traveling press, including Breaking Defense, on Tuesday. “That’s because we in the US, we’re focusing ourselves forward on new capability. So now we want to make sure we can produce, or see what it takes to produce, what we need for this crisis.”

Another issue, Hicks added, is that the US defense industry has been focused on building the more advanced munitions the US military has been procuring in recent years, whereas producing older weaponry like the 1970s era Stinger requires different skills.


“Transitioning that workforce over to the munitions that are appropriate for the Ukraine fight, that requires some shift of priority and training,” she said.

“We’ve had a lot of opportunity between the [Pentagon’s acquisition and sustainment] community… and the policy community to start thinking about how we work with other armaments directors in Europe and elsewhere to understand what they have, to start to understand the supply chain interrelationships, and see if we can speed some of that up.”

....
 
Posts: 15125 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
Biden's stupid policies are driving up energy costs and enabling Putin...

US Gas Production Set To Fall On Lack Of Pipelines

By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice.com

U.S. natural gas production will decline by 5 percent by 2050, and consumption will shed 4 percent if no new interstate pipelines are built, the Energy Information Administration said in its latest Annual Energy Outlook.

This, in turn, will lead to higher gas prices, the authority also said, and this will, in turn, lead to higher electricity prices.

“The higher natural gas prices that result from capacity constraints primarily affect natural gas consumption in the U.S. electric power sector, which is more price-sensitive than the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors,” the EIA explained.

The share of natural gas in power generation is set to decline in the scenario of no new interstate natural gas pipelines but not by much. According to the EIA, in that scenario, the share of gas in 2050 will constitute 31 percent of the total, compared with 34 percent under the agency’s reference scenario.

Yet, in absolute terms, the lack of new interstate gas pipelines will reduce gas-fired power generation by 11 percent in 2050 compared to the reference scenario.

At the same time, any bans on new interstate pipelines—a prerogative of the federal government—will not lead to any significant carbon dioxide emission declines.

“We project that restricting interstate U.S. natural gas pipeline capacity would only slightly lower energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States relative to the Reference case,” the EIA wrote.

“Total CO2 from all fuel sources in 2050 are 4% lower in the No Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Builds case than in the Reference case.”

One more thing that the EIA did not include in its report, but energy expert David Backmon raised as an issue this week in a podcast, is the link between interstate gas pipeline capacity and increased U.S. LNG exports to Europe, per President Biden’s commitment to Brussels to make up for a solid portion of Russian gas. Without more pipelines, Blackmon argued, U.S. LNG producers would find it difficult to boost exports sufficiently.

https://www.zerohedge.com/comm...-fall-lack-pipelines



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24720 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
^^^ Wait until the Euros start pressing Biden to increase North American pipeline capacity. The irony will be brutal.
 
Posts: 27305 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
I remember hearing about a Fox News Foreign correspondent being injured in Ukraine a few weeks ago. I hadn't realized it was Benjamin Hall. I haven't watched Fox News since 2020, but I remember Benjamin Hall well. He got pretty messed up in the attack. Looks like he is lucky to have survived.

***********************

Fox News' Benjamin Hall makes public severe injuries in deadly attack while reporting in Ukraine

Attack occurred March 14 near the Ukraine capital city of Kyiv

Fox News correspondent Benjamin Hall, injured in a deadly attack last month in Ukraine while reporting on the Russia invasion, on Thursday evening made a public statement about his severe injuries including those on both of his legs.

"To sum it up, I’ve lost half a leg on one side and a foot on the other," he tweeted. "One hand is being put together, one eye is no longer working, and my hearing is pretty blown… but all in all, I feel pretty damn lucky to be here – and it is the people who got me here who are amazing!"

Hall colleagues Pierre Zakrzewski, a Fox News cameraman, and Ukrainian journalist Oleksandra "Sasha" Kuvshinova were killed in the March 14 attack near the Ukraine capital city of Kyiv.

Hall, a State Department correspondent for the cable news network, was rescued after the attack and flown to a hospital in Germany, then transferred to a premier military medical facility in Texas where he has undergone multiple surgeries, Fox News reports.

"I need to pay tribute to my colleagues Pierre and Sasha who didn't make it that day," Hall also wrote in the tweet. "Pierre and I traveled the world together, working was his joy and his joy was infectious. RIP."

https://justthenews.com/world/...tack-while-reporting


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
The Russians have been targeting journalists to try to control the flow of information.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 34456 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 193 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Is that idiot Biden gonna get us in a war with Russia or China?

© SIGforum 2024