SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    NYT uncovers Democrats were behind adding another Dan Sullivan to the AK ballot to confuse voters
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
NYT uncovers Democrats were behind adding another Dan Sullivan to the AK ballot to confuse voters Login/Join 
Member
Picture of eclayton
posted Hide Post
Ranked choice voting is tailor-made and purpose-built for this kind of corrupt manipulation.
 
Posts: 360 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: October 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Altitude Minimum
Picture of BOATTRASH1
posted Hide Post
^^^EXACTLY^^^
 
Posts: 1498 | Location: Shalimar, FL | Registered: January 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Internet Guru
posted Hide Post
It's the kind of dirty trick the left likes to pretend only Richard Nixon would employ. They are normally insulated against exposure by their alliance with the media. The only surprising thing here is that the NYT's was the outlet breaking the story.
 
Posts: 2551 | Registered: April 06, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
In Odin we trust
Picture of akcopnfbks
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 2000Z-71:
quote:
Originally posted by ibanda:
Every article I have ever read about someplace that had ranked choice voting has been a cluster.


It has been an absolute cluster in Alaska. The law was written by a liberal from Colorado and backed by a lot of money from outside the state. It was billed as returning power to the people and limiting the influence of the 2 party system. That’s how it got voted in.

Alaska has a very independent attitude in politics, we’ve got legalized weed and constitutional carry. We take freedoms from both sides of the aisle and don’t really like either party telling us what we should and shouldn’t do. That was part of the appeal of ranked choice, giving the middle finger to both parties. It hasn’t worked out that way. I was very suspicious of it and voted against it.

So what has it gotten us? Mary Peltola got elected to her first term in the House with only 37% of the vote. It was a 4 way general election between republican Nick Begich, democrat Mary Peltola, republican Sarah Palin and independent (actually a democrat) Al Gross. Gross dropped out and endorsed Peltola immediately after the primary election. Palin was 3rd in the polls and refused to drop out of the race making it a 3 way between 2 republicans and a democrat. None of the candidates received a 50% +1 majority so ranked choice voting was triggered and Peltola got a lot of second place choices from the, “Anybody but Palin” mindset. So we got a US Representative that 63% of the voters did not want. Peltola got absolutely spanked 2 years ago by Nick Begich and lost her seat. Now she has returned to run for senate and is backed by a lot of out of state money in advertising.

Our primary this year for governor had 16 candidates. Why? Because there is no longer a convention to nominate candidates and anybody who gathers enough signatures can get their name on the ballot. The result is now headed into the general election there are 3 republican candidates and 1 democrat, a Yale dropout from Wisconsin who has never held a private sector job. Don’t really need a crystal ball to see where this is headed…

And now we have confirmation of the Peltola campaign being behind Fake Dan Sullivan trying to rig the election in her favor. I don’t like her, my dog growled at her and that’s reason enough for me not to vote for her.

There is a ballot measure again this year to end ranked choice voting. There is a ton of out of state money flowing in for advertising trying to defeat it. Very misleading I; their statements of keeping elections, “Fair” and guarding against, “Outside dark money”. It was tried 2 years ago but the ballot measure in the way it was written was confusing to the point where it was hard to tell if voting yes or no was going to get rid of it and it remained I; place by a very slim margin.

So to all members, if ranked choice voting ever comes up as a ballot measure I; your state, vote against it!


Well-said Z. Voting yes on Prop 2 will do away with ranked-choice voting AND close the primaries, as they should be. Fraud is why we lost the last election attempt to overturn ranked choice. On election day we were ahead by 10k votes. Then "miraculously" as the "absentee" ballots came in we ended up "losing" by like 30 votes. Complete horseshit.

All that said, Alaska is fast going the way of WA, OR, and CA. There are roughly 740k people in Alaska. Of that over half live in the Anchorage general area. Anchorage is a liberal, blue city, albeit with pockets of red still, but complete with fentanyl zombies. It's a matter of time before Anchorage grows to the point where it will just dominate the state politically, regardless how everyone else votes. Combine that with the native villages, who all vote blue all the time, and it's going to be a tough row to hoe over the next decade or so.

If you'd told me a decade ago that every major city (such as they are in Alaska) in the state would have a Democrat mayor, what amounts to a Democrat legislature (more than a few R's who act like D's, effectively giving the Dems control), and a Republican governor floating the idea of a state income tax I'd have said you were crazy. But......here we are.


_________________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than omnipotent moral busybodies" ~ C.S. Lewis

 
Posts: 1886 | Location: The Northernmost Broadcast Point of Radio Free America | Registered: February 24, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Partial dichotomy
posted Hide Post
quote:
The only surprising thing here is that the NYT's was the outlet breaking the story.



Yes! I'm pleasantly surprised and I suppose it shows just how egregious it is. Can't cover this shit up.




SIGforum: For all your needs!
Imagine our influence if every gun owner in America was an NRA member! Click the box>>>
 
Posts: 42244 | Location: SC Lowcountry/Cape Cod | Registered: November 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by akcopnfbks:
Anchorage is a liberal, blue city, albeit with pockets of red still, but complete with fentanyl zombies. It's a matter of time before Anchorage grows to the point where it will just dominate the state politically, regardless how everyone else votes.

Which is why I've long advocated an electoral college type system at the state level. There would be no more NYC, Chicago, LA/SF, Seattle running the table.

quote:
Combine that with the native villages, who all vote blue all the time, and it's going to be a tough row to hoe over the next decade or so.
No different than the reservations down here. They won't bite the hand that (literally) feeds them.


________________________________________________________
It is long past time for a Convention of States. The Founding Fathers gave us this tool to fix an out of control government and we need to use it.
 
Posts: 23206 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of dsiets
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 6guns:
quote:
The only surprising thing here is that the NYT's was the outlet breaking the story.



Yes! I'm pleasantly surprised and I suppose it shows just how egregious it is. Can't cover this shit up.

They've been sitting on the story for over a month.
 
Posts: 8298 | Location: MI | Registered: May 22, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No More
Mr. Nice Guy
posted Hide Post
There's a reason the NYT released the story, and it isn't unbiased journalism. Something big was about to break and they had to come clean first. Idk what it was, but they wouldn't have released their story if they didn't have to.
 
Posts: 11552 | Location: On the mountain off the grid | Registered: February 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    NYT uncovers Democrats were behind adding another Dan Sullivan to the AK ballot to confuse voters

© SIGforum 2026