Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
https://justthenews.com/govern..._campaign=newsletter Pennsylvania’s highest court on Wednesday overturned Bill Cosby’s sex assault conviction, allowing him to be immediately released from prison. The 83-year-old Cosby will reportedly be released after the court found an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented him from being charged in the case, according to the Associated Press. The famous actor and comedian was two years into a three- to 10-year sentence at a state prison near Philadelphia. He had vowed to serve all 10 years rather than acknowledge any remorse over the 2004 encounter with his accuser, the wire service also reports. Cosby was convicted of drugging and molesting the female accuser, a Temple University employee, at his suburban estate. He was charged in late 2015, when a prosecutor armed with newly unsealed evidence — Cosby’s damaging deposition from her lawsuit — arrested him days before the 12-year statute of limitations expired. The trial judge had allowed just one other accuser to testify at Cosby’s first trial, when the jury deadlocked. However, he then allowed five other accusers to testify at the retrial about their experiences with Cosby in the 1980s. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said that testimony tainted the trial, even though a lower appeals court had found it appropriate to show a signature pattern of drugging and molesting women, the Associated Press also reports. _________________________ "Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." Mark Twain | ||
|
Info Guru |
Link to the opinion: https://www.pacourts.us/assets...40139246918.pdf?cb=1 If you believe in due process it was the right call. https://threadreaderapp.com/th...287243068116992.html “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” - John Adams | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
| |||
|
Internet Guru |
Probably going to be a three pudding night. | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
No doubt his rights were violated, it has to be done, regardless if he's a perv, can't have governments disregarding peoples rights to justify a conviction, lest we all want to give up those rights... | |||
|
Official Space Nerd |
So, he did the crime he is accused of, but is getting off because of a technicality. . . At least he served SOME time, and his reputation is still in the crapper. He should still be worth millions, but he can't show his face in public without a SEVERE backlash, few (if any) of his previous friends and associates will (likely) want anything to do with him, and he'll be paparazzi bait for the rest of his life, so it's not all wine and roses for the rapist. In many ways, he will remain a 'prisoner' until the day he dies. I don't like it, but I agree it must be done. This is why it is SO important for the prosecutors to do their due diligence and NOT screw up due process. Fear God and Dread Nought Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
Let's not forget why they went after him so hard and were determined to shut him up and see him die in prison. It was this and the many other times he pointed the finger at black people themselves and they could not have that if the victim culture industry was to continue:
Link | |||
|
Member |
Lots of scumbags get off on "technicalities," but those technicalities are what hopefully sets a fair justice system apart from kangaroo courts. | |||
|
Member |
Due process is not a technicality. Cosby was accused of sexual assault in 2005 but the prosecutor determined there was not enough evidence to convict him. He was also sued in civil court for the same thing, but as long at the threat of criminal prosecution hung over him he could assert his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to testify in the civil case. The prosecutor publicly stated that he would not prosecute Cosby and, with criminal charges off the table, he was forced to testify in the civil case. This was what the prosecutor intended, so there would be at least some justice for the accuser. About 10 years later the state "changed its mind" and decided to charge him criminally with the same assault and use the testimony in his civil case against him. Bill Cosby is apparently a very bad guy, not Heathcliff Huxtable like many (including me) assumed for so long. But there can be absolutely no tolerance for chipping away at the Constitution, even if someone deserves what they would get if their rights were bent "just a little bit." | |||
|
Member |
Well said Hound Dog. I have no sympathy for Cosby, and I'm a guy who enjoyed his humor and his social commentary yet, he did a number of bad things and those have repercussions. The prosecutors in their zeal to have his hide on the wall of justice and be the catalyst for the #MeToo movement they over-looked their responsibility for due diligence and procedure. | |||
|
Bodhisattva |
How long before Cosby sues the state for wrongful prosecution/incarceration (or whatever its called)? | |||
|
Little ray of sunshine |
I would hardly consider the constitutionally guaranteed right to due process of law to be a technicality. It is one the very most fundamental of rights we have. If this is a technicality, then so is free speech, the right to bear arms, the right to trial by jury . . . You get the point. The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything. | |||
|
Member |
He did get pretty close to serving the minimum of his sentence did he not? Collecting dust. | |||
|
Little ray of sunshine |
Served two years of a three to ten year sentence. The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything. | |||
|
Member |
Bottom line. Set the controls for the heart of the Sun. | |||
|
Member |
i dont know much about the specifics of this case. but that fact that he did even a couple + years is probably a 'success' for the prosecution. will be interesting to see what happens next. he was one of the biggest stars of the 80s. ---------------------------------- Proverbs 27:17 - As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another. | |||
|
quarter MOA visionary |
He was a pretty big deal way before the eighties. | |||
|
Member |
no doubt but -- The Cosby Show will surely be what he is best / most remembered for : According to TV Guide, the show "was TV's biggest hit in the 1980s, and almost single-handedly revived the sitcom genre and NBC's ratings fortunes."[2] TV Guide also ranked it 28th on their list of 50 Greatest Shows.[3] In addition, Cliff Huxtable was named as the "Greatest Television Dad".[4] -------------------------- Proverbs 27:17 - As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another. | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
Next? Nothing. He's free. He won't be prosecuted again. ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
blame canada |
I wouldn't choose Mr. Cosby to lead the "wrongly accused" charge against scumbag prosecutors who "bend" the rules to further their careers. I agree with those who are stating that rules are there for a reason, not to be broken...and an infringement like is being reported here is every bit as important as an infringement on second or first amendment rights. The right to freedom...and freedom from illegal persecution by our own justice system, MUST be protected. We simply do not correctly hold prosecutors accountable. I would venture (with less knowledge than many others here), that a sizeable portion of the prosecution side of things do some pretty awful and scummy things. I've seen it where I live, I've seen it in other places also. Just as we should never use Floyd as some "saint" for whatever cause they mistakenly think that organization had...I'm not sure anyone should use Cosby either. I do hope he is able to ruin some prosecutor's careers though. I really detest the ones that pick and choose cases they know they can win, and break rules to do it. It affects the innocent and encourages vigilantes. It smears LE and makes all law professionals look like douchebags. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The trouble with our Liberal friends...is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan, 1964 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn't matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon will just take a shit on the board, strut around knocking over all the pieces and act like it won.. and in some cases it will insult you at the same time." DevlDogs55, 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.rikrlandvs.com | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |