SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Question for car nuts
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Question for car nuts Login/Join 
Member
posted
I found what appears to be a complete list (several lists actually) of GM RPO codes and it shows that the RPO L78 was a code for a 400 cubic inch V8 with a 4 barrel. Looking up just L78 RPO it clearly was a big block 396 with forged crank, solid lifter cam, and cast aluminum hi rise intake.
Does anyone know the reason for the discrepancy?
 
Posts: 1326 | Registered: July 14, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Technically Adaptive
posted Hide Post
They did make a 400 small block that was externally balanced at the flywheel and harmonic balancer, working on them back then you had get the correct parts. No sure on the RPO code though.
 
Posts: 1530 | Location: Willcox, AZ | Registered: September 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of powermad
posted Hide Post
A 400 big block Chevy is a 396 bored. 030" over.
They had a bunch of blocks that got left outside and rusted the cylinder walls.
Instead of scrapping them they were bored .030" over.
 
Posts: 1586 | Location: Portland Oregon | Registered: October 01, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I know what I like
I like what I know
Picture of Mark in Michigan
posted Hide Post
GM is constantly reusing, redefining and repurposing RPO Codes. One engine goes out of production and it's RPO code is archived for a few model years. Later, the RPO code is brought out of archive and used for a new engine.


Best regards,
Mark in Michigan
 
Posts: 549 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: December 29, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Page late and a dollar short
posted Hide Post
LS7 was originally destined for a big block 454 that was cancelled for production in 1970. GM did release parts as over the parts counter items and in 1974 did offer a complete LS7 advertised for off road use and marine use only.

And the LS7 is now in the LS series engines again.


-------------------------------------——————
————————--Ignorance is a powerful tool if applied at the right time, even, usually, surpassing knowledge(E.J.Potter, A.K.A. The Michigan Madman)
 
Posts: 8585 | Location: Livingston County Michigan USA | Registered: August 11, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
While the L78 engine is often associated with a "396" designation, in 1970, the final year of production for the L78, the engine was actually a 402 cubic inch engine due to the 396 block being bored out slightly, making it effectively a 402 despite still being marketed as a "396" on the car.

Key points about the L78 and 402:

Displacement change: The L78 engine in 1970 was essentially a bored-out version of the 396, resulting in a 402 cubic inch displacement.

Marketing discrepancy: Although the engine was technically a 402, Chevrolet continued to market it as a "396" on the cars.

Last year of L78: 1970 was the final production year for the L78 engine.

The 400 was really a 402, Chevy just marketed it as a 400...
 
Posts: 25001 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Question for car nuts

© SIGforum 2025