https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902750686145810716

FIVE anti Trump judges are involved in a secretive, INVITE ONLY club for judges and lawyers called the American Inns of Court. Even the membership and meetings are secret. But somehow the DOJ has shown up at meetings. At least since Biden had been in office.

Is hobnobbing with the DOJ in court matters acceptable? Let alone meeting in secret?

So who all is linked to this selective and secretive club? And recall all of their negative Trump rulings?

- Judge James Boasberg (President)
- Scotus Ketanji Brown Jackson (Vice President)
- Judge Amit Mehta (Secretary and a meeting held at her court.)
- Judge Beryl Howell
Justice (Professionalism Award)
-Justice John Roberts (Honorary Bencher of the Middle Temple)

Wasn’t it something else that Judge John Roberts broke ethical conduct and stuck up for his, “brother Boasberg”?

George Soros has funded a fellowship at Middle Temple where John Roberts is a master of the bench.

First let me very quickly explain how this secret society called, the American Inns of Court came about. In the UK, they have the four Inns of Court that dates back hundreds of years. One of those is called Middle Temple (see Roberts photo). Well, the US created the American version of this in recent decades. There’s a massive list of branches.

The branch many of our judges belong to is The Edward Bennett Williams (EBW) Inn of Court. It’s so secretive, they deleted most signs of this branch from their website although they still met.

Now here’s Judge Beryl Howell. She was nominated by President Judge Boasberg, and VP Ketanji Brown Jackson approved of her nomination. Boasberg claims it was her work on Jan 6 that contributed to his choosing her for the American Inns Of Court Professionalism award.

Let me show you the scant meeting info that I found which included the DOJ and Inspector General Horowitz in attendance.

1. The Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court: BOP Custody / Current Status of BOP / Early Release & Reentry: Washington DC, 2/15/24

“Joel Sickler – invited panelist at EBW Inn of Court (February15, 2024, Washington DC). The meeting held in the District of Columbia Court of Judge Amit Mehta. In addition to panelists, approximately 150 lawyers including several Federal District Judges were also present. The panel was presented primarily with Michael Horowitz, DOJ Inspector General and Seth Eichenholtz, Deputy Assistant Attorney General – also featuring Vanessa Rojas, a returning citizen with direct and learned perspective regarding constructive reforms within the Bureau of Prisons.”

Also there was:

“Seth Rosenthal, Chief Deputy Attorney General for Office of AG District of Columbia.”

2. Mathew Bester, 3 years ago in a quote Linkdn post:

“I really enjoyed talking about the latest DOJ developments last week on a great panel.”

Matthew was reposting Brent Gurney’s Post and yes the DOJ was there:

“I want to thank my co-hosts, Erin K. of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Lisa Phelan of Morrison & Foerster LLP, Inn member G. Zachary Terwilliger of Vinson & Elkins and our guest panelists Jim Fredricks of the DOJ Antitrust Division, Tiffany Rider of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Matthew Bester of Accenture, for a robust and fascinating discussion of the issues.”

3. Yearly gala, I’ll review this later. But the Assistant United States Attorney at U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia replied in a comment. Was he there?

“Great job, Rebecca!”

I’ve seen lawsuits online for this secret org over recusal worries with this private club. I also saw a lawsuit that stated their secrecy is dangerous to democracy.

I was hoping for "The Star Chamber", but then I saw the names.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086356/

Nothing to see here. There is no "Obama Judge". Move along, please...

Stow that stuff.

While none of this would surprise me at all, you still have to be careful of things that come out of the interwebz. I see lots of stuff on X that’s just pure nonsense. You can ‘virtually’ say anything, even on X, and there’s no accountability. Just my opinion.

I'm careful about what I post

quote:

Originally posted by jbcummings:
While none of this would surprise me at all, you still have to be careful of things that come out of the interwebz. I see lots of stuff on X that’s just pure nonsense. You can ‘virtually’ say anything, even on X, and there’s no accountability. Just my opinion.

So you're saying that X post from the Gateway Pundit that has a link to their news site is sus because they posted about it on X?

The investigative work was done by @pepesgrandma, who goes on Twitter I SAID TWITTER by the name of 'Bad Kitty Unleashed'. The second post in this thread is from that user and it details the investigative work.

I didn't post this here on a whim after looking at Twitter for 15 seconds.

Take a look for yourself:

https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902754710387650887

The top post has been edited, apologies for the difficulties. Make certain to use the modest version.

I found with great difficulties, this list of The Edward Bennett Williams American Inn of Court leaders. In fact I had to search the archives.

Every link there is for members only except the leaders and meetings list. The meeting list is blank tho.

Click around in archive 1 and see for yourself.

Archive 1
https://web.archive.org/web/20...ers.aspx?innid=30072

Archive 2

https://archive.is/7tQUr

A fact, pure fucking fact- it was John Roberts who appointed Boasberg to the FISA court in regards to the FBI/CIA surveillance of Trump in 2016, And it is Boasberg who brought in Mary McCord who was not only instrumental in the spying on Trump's campaign, but also played a major role in his impeachment hearings. And Mary McCord is the wife of John Robert's staffer Sheldon Snook. And it is Roberts who is protecting Boasberg now.

Small motherfuckin world

Sorry guys, but American Inns of Court is not some uber elite, Mason-like secret club. There are chapters all over the country. I was a member for a decade or so and I am a nobody.

^^^ Roberts is clearly compromised and should resign.

This isn't news.

Need to do the research prior to hanging the guy.

quote:

Originally posted by ulsterman:
This isn't news.

Need to do the research prior to hanging the guy.

Which guy? I'm willing to hang Roberts just over the Affordable Care Act ruling.

quote:

Originally posted by ulsterman:
This isn't news.

The questionable associations most certainly are news.

This is no "nothing to see here...move along" thing. This is a big deal. I would hope the Judiciary Committee (or some other group) begins an investigation.

The Chief Justice is hobnobbing with district court justices whose very cases he may well be presiding over someday.. WTF??.

He belongs to an organization that is comprised of Judges and Lawyers. Some are conservative, some are liberal.

You need to loosen your tinfoil hats. Not everything is a conspiracy.

quote:

Originally posted by ulsterman:

Need to do the research prior to hanging the guy.

What research and what guy?

quote:

Originally posted by Bassamatic:
This is no "nothing to see here...move along" thing. This is a big deal...

When one says that, it is sarcasm and means the exact opposite. I'm surprised I had to spell that out for you.

quote:

Originally posted by ulsterman:
You need to loosen your tinfoil hats. Not everything is a conspiracy.

Not everything is a conspiracy? You're saying this to me? Are you listening to yourself? Have you not ever encountered on the pages of this forum the countless times I have shut down discussions of supposed conspiracies? Really? Is your rock in the shop for repair?? Good gravy!

If you want to say this is nothing, then say it, but don't try to make me out to be some whacko who sees conspiracies in everything. I'm the other guy- the guy who believes almost none of the conspiracy theories. You would have a very hard time finding anyone, anywhere, who is as skeptical in general of conspiracies as I, and that's no exaggeration. Savvy? Ask anyone who reads this forum on a regular basis. It's the truth.

Wow. Where have you been?