Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Read the decision again. “Held: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.” The decision doesn’t say the federal government can’t regulate abortion. It says the Constitution doesn’t grant a right to abortion such that the states can’t regulate it. Whether Congress can or not is a completely separate question. | |||
|
Member |
The abortion issue is being used as a rallying point in an effort to pull people to vote Democrat in the up coming mid terms. Its a distraction to divert attention from inflation, gas prices and everything else they have screwed up since Biden took office. End of Earth: 2 Miles Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles | |||
|
Political Cynic |
Leave it to a democrat to try to capitalize on the bodies of dead babies. What a pathetic excuse of a human you have to be to even think about doing that. | |||
|
Be prepared for loud noise and recoil |
Biden’s words, more or less… “The court is daring women to take this to the ballot box.” YES! Idiot. Really tired of this dementia addled schmuck. “Crisis is the rallying cry of the tyrant.” – James Madison "Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." - Robert Louis Stevenson | |||
|
Member |
(e)Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion . Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. The Court overrules those decisions and returns that authority to the people and their elected representatives. Pp. 78–79. Where does is say Federal? | |||
|
Member |
Winner, winner, chicken dinner. Biden can do nothing, and he did nothing with his EO, except pander to his base that is abandoning him at light speed. Today was little more than a deluded, rambling, incoherent, attempt at a campaign speech to try and prove he really is doing something, when all he's doing is filling his Depends and babbling mindlessly. Today's publicity event changed/accomplished exactly nothing. However, I do want the name and address info on the 11 year old girl Biden vomited about being pregnant and having to travel to another state for an abortion. I 100% guarantee that story is 100% made up, prime, bovine output. ----------------------------- Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter | |||
|
"Member" |
Don’t blame old Joe, he’s only doing what he’s told. (and saying exactly what he reads lmao) | |||
|
Staring back from the abyss |
https://www.theblaze.com/shows...-brings-the-receipts ________________________________________________________ "Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton. | |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
Here's at least some information on what the executive order will specifically do: http://www.cnn.com/2022/07/08/...ive-order/index.html Assuming CNN has it right, it's mostly a whole lotta nothing. HHS is supposed to make abortion-type services more available, Garland's trying to make an abortion drug unbannable, plus a task group and a report in 30 days. Pretty much BFD. The interesting part is that HHS is trying to tell doctors (who, incidentally, are licensed by the states rather than some federal agency) that HIPAA prevents them from sharing patient information with law enforcement. Can't wait to see how that shakes out in court. | |||
|
Member |
Right. I'm sometimes guilty of blaming Biden for things myself. Even though Biden has always been a stupid ass, (and an asshole); he has absolutely nothing to do with any decision making, policy, appointments to cabinet or any of the alphabet agency positions. ------------------------------------------------ "It's hard to imagine a more stupid or dangerous way of making decisions, than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." Thomas Sowell | |||
|
Member |
That’s exactly my point, it doesn’t. The Supreme Court almost always rules very narrowly on a key issue of a case. The key issue here was, “does a Constitutional right to abortion prevent the states from restricting abortion (past a certain amount of restriction that past decisions allowed)?” The Supreme Court’s answer was “no, no Constitutional right to abortion prevents the states from restricting abortion.” Whether or not Congress can make a law about it wasn’t part of the question and wasn’t part of the answer. | |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
^^^ Indeed, many a court holding, to certainly include SCOTUS holdings on abortion law, has long lamented that the US Congress has failed to legislate on the subject. This could well be seen as SCOTUS telling Congress to get off its collective ass and take responsibility rather than bitching about what the courts do or don't do on the campaign stump. | |||
|
Member |
Actually it was. It the decision that overturned Roe and Casey, the USSC said it was a state issue and the Fed had no Constitutional power one way or the other. Now the Fed (Reps, senate and pres) can't just decide by law that it is a Federal power. To do that would take a Constitutional Amendment ceding that power from the states to the Fed. | |||
|
Member |
That is not remotely what the decision or any of the quotes you’ve taken from it say. | |||
|
Member |
Why do we need to do this? Roe is history. The subject of abortion has been returned to the states (where it always belonged). Whether they could legally legislate of not, the Congress 'will not' legislate on the issue because of self serving, rampant, cowardice. As much as the Left doesn't want to accept it, the issue is dead...for now and the foreseeable future. Let's all just rejoice in where we're at right now, and take on challenges in the future whenever they arise. ----------------------------- Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter | |||
|
Member |
No, it doesn’t say that. The decision said there is no Constitutional right to an abortion. It didn’t say anything about whether the federal government can pass legislation prohibiting states from banning abortion or whether the federal government can operate abortion facilities in states over their objection. That’s the next battle to be fought. | |||
|
Shall Not Be Infringed |
The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." ____________________________________________________________ If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !! Trump 2024....Make America Great Again! "May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20 Live Free or Die! | |||
|
Member |
Agreed. The question is whether Article 1 of the Constitution gives the federal government the power to regulate access to abortion or to operate abortion clinics in states over their objection. If it does not, then that power belongs to the people. | |||
|
Left-Handed, NOT Left-Winged! |
All other laws about homicide, assisted suicide, etc. are state level. Civil rights legislation is nationwide, but that pertains to protecting individual rights, and abortion is not a right. Feds usually use the interstate commerce clause to justify massive overreach in many things. I'm not sure how it could be applied to abortion, but they will certainly try to find a way. | |||
|
Member |
Agreed that the commerce clause is the most likely candidate. Maybe they can overturn Wickard while they’re at it. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |