Townhall.com
Walter Williams
May 9, 2018

Before the massive growth of our welfare state, private charity was the sole option for an individual or family facing insurmountable financial difficulties or other challenges. How do we know that? There is no history of Americans dying on the streets because they could not find food or basic medical assistance. Respecting the biblical commandment to honor thy father and mother, children took care of their elderly or infirm parents. Family members and the local church also helped those who had fallen on hard times.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, charities started playing a major role. In 1887, religious leaders founded the Charity Organization Society, which became the first United Way organization. In 1904, Big Brothers Big Sisters of America started helping at-risk youths reach their full potential. In 1913, the American Cancer Society, dedicated to curing and eliminating cancer, was formed. With their millions of dollars, industrial giants such as Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller created our nation's first philanthropic organizations.

Generosity has always been a part of the American genome. Alexis de Tocqueville, a French civil servant, made a nine-month visit to our country in 1831 and 1832, ostensibly to study our prisons. Instead, his visit resulted in his writing "Democracy in America," one of the most influential books about our nation. Tocqueville didn't use the term "philanthropy," but he wrote extensively about how Americans love to form all kinds of nongovernmental associations to help one another. These associations include professional, social, civic and other volunteer organizations seeking to serve the public good and improve the quality of human lives. The bottom line is that we Americans are the most generous people in the world, according to the new Almanac of American Philanthropy -- something we should be proud of.

Before the welfare state, charity embodied both a sense of gratitude on the behalf of the recipient and magnanimity on the behalves of donors. There was a sense of civility by the recipients. They did not feel that they were owed, were entitled to or had a right to the largesse of the donor. Recipients probably felt that if they weren't civil and didn't express their gratitude, more assistance wouldn't be forthcoming. In other words, they were reluctant to bite the hand that helped them. With churches and other private agencies helping, people were much likelier to help themselves and less likely to engage in self-destructive behavior. Part of the message of charitable groups was: "We'll help you if you help yourself."

Enter the federal government. Civility and gratitude toward one's benefactors are no longer required in the welfare state. In fact, one can be arrogant and hostile toward the "donors" (taxpayers), as well as the civil servants who dish out the benefits. The handouts that recipients get are no longer called charity; they're called entitlements -- as if what is received were earned.

There is virtually no material poverty in the U.S. Eighty percent of households the Census Bureau labels as poor have air conditioning; nearly three-quarters have a car or truck, and 31 percent have two or more. Two-thirds have cable or satellite TV. Half have at least one computer. Forty-two percent own their homes. What we have in our nation is not material poverty but dependency and poverty of the spirit, with people making unwise choices and leading pathological lives, aided and abetted by the welfare state. Part of this pathological lifestyle is reflected in family structure. According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year 11 percent of black children and 3 percent of white children were born to unwed mothers. Today it's respectively 75 percent and 30 percent.

There are very little guts in the political arena to address the downside of the welfare state. To do so risks a politician's being labeled as racist, sexist, uncaring and insensitive. That means today's dependency is likely to become permanent.

Link

Gospel.

Thank you for sharing this.

Williams is generally spot-on in his assessments. He’s one of my fave celebs.

It is sad that this is what our nation has come to after so many years.
I find it interesting that we as a nation are still so charitable to those in need and give so much money and time to non government groups.
My favorite is the salvation army.

My father was dirt poor growing up in Southern Ohio. To hear him tell it, being dirt poor was a step up because at least they had dirt.

To help learn a trade and also put food on the table, my grandfather worked for/part of the WPA.

Till the day he died, he believed that welfare should be eliminated and they should bring back some form of the WPA. That way people could work, learn a trade and not being given anything free. Hence that entitlement view.

Can you imagine with the snowflakes these days and the looks of horror and the safe places that would need to be built if they were told that they had to build a school or dig a ditch to earn money. NO MORE Freebies

That is a great article and thanks for posting it.
It is right on the money.

quote:

Originally posted by rsbolo:
Gospel.

Thank you for sharing this.

Yes, gospel. Amen.

Church people would rather have the church doing the charity work than the government.

Gov't welfare established the destructive false principle that one citizen can legitimately lay claim to what another has produced without an equitable transfer of value. That concept is a time bomb.

I deal with welfare every day. When you have four kids and receive around $480 a month per child, reduced rent public housing and a free Obama phone, why work?