SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    H8073 and S2710 - Rhode Island determined to become the commiest of all the states in the Union
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
H8073 and S2710 - Rhode Island determined to become the commiest of all the states in the Union Login/Join 
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted
H8073

S2710

quote:
1 SECTION 1. Section 11-47.2-2 of the General Laws in Chapter 11-47.2 entitled "Unlawful

2 Sale of Prohibited Firearms [Effective July 1, 2026.]" is hereby amended to read as follows:

3 11-47.2-2. Restrictions on manufacture, sale, and purchase of prohibited firearms.

4 Restrictions on manufacture, sale, possession, and purchase of prohibited firearms. [Effective

5 July 1, 2026.]


6 (a) No person shall manufacture, sell, offer to sell, transfer, possess, or purchase a

7 prohibited firearm, except as otherwise authorized under this section. Any person convicted of

8 violating this subsection shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than ten (10) years, or by

9 a fine up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000), and the prohibited firearm shall be subject to forfeiture.

10 (b) The following limited exceptions to subsection (a) of this section shall apply:

11 (1) A person who lawfully possesses a prohibited firearm prior to July 1, 2026, may sell,

12 offer to sell, or transfer their prohibited firearm to a federally licensed firearm dealer, or to an

13 individual outside the state who may lawfully possess such weapon by December 31, 2026.





Why is this significant? They will become the first state in the nation to outright ban the possession of "assault weapons" by non-FFLs/non-LEOs with absolutely no grandfather clause. If you already owned them prior to the law going into effect, they give you until December 31, 2026 to dispose of them by selling to an FFL dealer, or to someone outside the state.

The question is, how are they going to enforce this shit. And, will it pass constitutional muster?


Q






 
Posts: 30961 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of rainmaker5505
posted Hide Post
I don't see how it can pass constitutional muster. It has already been determined that AR15 type rifles, etc. meet the "commonly owned" standard. The issue will be that the lawsuits will take longer than it will take for the law to go into effect. They will be forced to remove the part where previously owned guns must be sold, but the damage will already have been done. This is the trend among the leftists, throw as much shit at the wall as you can, at a rapid pace, and some of it always sticks.



"America could use some turpentine, all the way from Hollywierd to New York City." -- Phil Robertson
 
Posts: 512 | Location: Oxford, PA | Registered: January 27, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
To the RI legislature:



quote:
And, will it pass constitutional muster?


No, but they won't let that stop them. But unless and until this is signed by the governor - or, if the RI constitution permits, allowed to become law without a signature - this is not a done deal.





"The Almighty, He put some livin' things on this earth so a man can eat." - Festus Haggen, Gunsmoke
 
Posts: 31565 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
As I’ve said before, the one advantage to such draconian antirights laws is that they increase the probability that they will be overturned by the court(s). But regardless of that possibility the advantage to the politicians is that they can then say, “Well, we tried, but ….” That gives them the benefit of appeasing the antis without running any risk that an aroused gun owning community would finally wake up, say, “Are you serious‽ Enough is enough,” and finally do something to protect their rights. Keep your cake and eat it too.

But who knows? There is no guarantee that any law, no matter how bad, won’t be passed anywhere, and no guarantee that any law, no matter how bad, would ultimately be overturned.




6.0/94.0

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
 
Posts: 49513 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Commirado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Optimistic Cynic
Picture of architect
posted Hide Post
The key is, as is here in VA, what legally constitutes an "assault" or "prohibited" firearm. Our wonderful legislature has expanded the definition to include almost all modern handguns and rifles, not just the "usual suspects" (ARs, AKs, etc.)

Their fellow travelers in Fairfax County have managed to close the May "Nation's Gunshow," which was nearly the last chance to get what you need before the new law goes into effect on 7/1. I'm betting that the same will happen to the scheduled June show as well.

RI isn't the only State that is hell-bent on enslaving its populace.
 
Posts: 7909 | Location: NoVA | Registered: July 22, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Age Quod Agis
Picture of ArtieS
posted Hide Post
This is not the Rhode Island I grew up in.



"I vowed to myself to fight against evil more completely and more wholeheartedly than I ever did before. . . . That’s the only way to pay back part of that vast debt, to live up to and try to fulfill that tremendous obligation."

Alfred Hornik, Sunday, December 2, 1945 to his family, on his continuing duty to others for surviving WW II.
 
Posts: 13595 | Location: Florida, Northwest of the Mouse | Registered: November 02, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Just when I thought you couldn’t get worse than my former home state of NY. When they passed the 2012 “safe act” you had a limited time to register your AW or sell out of state, or convert to a non AW. Trouble was, no one in authority would stand behind what a legal conversion was! A LOT went into dark closets, and I am sure many people remained totally ignorant of the new laws/ rules. In about 20 years thousands of unregistered AW’s will come to light in NY undoubtedly
 
Posts: 3792 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Snapping Twig
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 2923 | Registered: May 28, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
This is not true. There is a grandfather clause in the bill that has passed (SO359).
What you are talking about has been proposed but has NOT been passed at this time.
It has been tabled for further study

Bob
 
Posts: 193 | Location: RI | Registered: January 05, 2022Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    H8073 and S2710 - Rhode Island determined to become the commiest of all the states in the Union

© SIGforum 2026