SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    IRS Postpones $600 per year 1099-K
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
IRS Postpones $600 per year 1099-K Login/Join 
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by .38supersig:
Big tech companies (eBay, PayPal, Venmo, Poshmark, CashApp) like big government.
I doubt they'll like the effect of this, though. This year a buddy reimbursed me over $1400 for materials I acquired on his behalf. We used Venmo.

Going forward: I will execute no single e-transaction, or aggregate of e-transactions with a singled individual, exceeding $599.

Period.

That means they'll be used for little more than splitting bar tabs and greens fees.

I doubt I'm alone.
quote:
Originally posted by FishOn:
Covered here:

https://sigforum.com/eve/forum...0601935/m/3040070694
Because that having been pointed-out twice, already, wasn't enough?



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26009 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
Going forward: I will execute no single e-transaction, or aggregate of e-transactions with a singled individual, exceeding $599.


See, it's not over $600 in one transaction, or over $600 from one person.

It's $600 or more received in total from any/all payers using that electronic payment service in the entire year.

So even if you try to structure it out however you want with transaction caps and per-person aggregate limits, if you receive a total of $600 or more within an entire year from all payers put together, it would trigger a 1099-K. You'd have to keep your total amount received each year to under $600.


Think of it like your income bracket. It's not based on your maximum per paycheck. It's not based on your income from one specific employer. It's based on the total of all your income added up from any source over the course of a whole year.
 
Posts: 32524 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
See, it's not over $600 in one transaction, or over $600 from one person.

It's $600 or more received in total from any/all payers using that electronic payment service in the entire year.
Ok, fine. I will use no e-payment system for more than $599/year, total, period.

I very, very rarely would, anyway. This year was an anomaly. But, if something like it happens again, they can reimburse me by personal check or with cash.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26009 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Info Guru
Picture of BamaJeepster
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Edmond:
quote:
Originally posted by nhracecraft:
quote:
It was included as part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021...

Roll Eyes


Yeah what the fuck is that supposed mean?

Let's ease the financial strain on taxpayers by taxing them more. Roll Eyes


Hey guys, we've got a war against Russia to fund! Congress is shoveling trillions to the Ukraine, somebody's gotta pay for it - and guess who it's going to end up being?



“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
- John Adams
 
Posts: 29408 | Location: In the red hinterlands of Deep Blue VA | Registered: June 29, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 1s1k:
quote:
Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
If it makes you feel better ONE THIRD of Americans receive FREE healthcare through Medicaid. Some states allow income to be up to 80 thousand.

And people wonder why so many are not going to work.

Not bad for a family of four to stay home and watch tv all day.



Do you have a link for that picture, I'd like to read the article.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 20830 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
Aaaaaand... Postponed yet again, with a new plan to potentially phase in a stepdown from the current $20k to an intermediate $5k next year, rather than going directly to $600, though it's unclear if the IRS has the authority to do that without new legislation.

(This is starting to sound a lot like the federal Real ID mandate fiasco. "Everyone must be in compliance by 2005. I meant 2008. I meant 2014. I meant 2018, unless your state has a special waiver. Okay, every state gets a waiver, but only until 2020. Alright, 2023. I meant 2025.")

From https://www.forbes.com/sites/k...lay/?sh=4d3f00b4e695

quote:
IRS Announces Big Changes To Form 1099-K, Including Another Reporting Delay

Christmas came early (again) this year for many taxpayers and tax professionals. The IRS has announced that it would (again) delay the new $600 Form 1099-K reporting threshold for third-party settlement organizations.

The IRS will treat 2023 as an additional transition year. If that sounds familiar, the same thing happened last year when the agency announced that the 2022 tax year would be considered a transition period. Third-party settlement organizations were not required to report tax year 2022 transactions on Form 1099-K to the IRS or the payee for the lower $600 threshold amount—the existing $20,000/200 transaction threshold remained in effect through year-end.

The same year-long transition year will apply to 2023. The IRS says the move will reduce the potential confusion caused by the distribution of an estimated 44 million Forms 1099-K sent to many taxpayers who wouldn't expect one and may not have a tax obligation. As a result, third-party reporting will only be required if the taxpayer receives over $20,000 and has more than 200 transactions in 2023.

That should mean that you will not receive Form 1099-K unless you hit the existing transaction threshold. However, an exception does exist for taxpayers who were subject to backup withholding. All other taxpayers should see no change in early 2024 when forms go out, consistent with the treatment from last year.

"The IRS will use this additional time to continue carefully crafting a way forward to minimize burden," Werfel said. "We want to make this as easy as possible for taxpayers. We will work to make the new reporting requirements easier for them, and we'll work closely with third-party groups, tax professionals and others to find the smoothest path to ensure compliance with the law. This is consistent with our Strategic Operating Plan. The IRS is focused on meeting taxpayers where they are and helping them get it right the first time."

Threshold Changes On the Horizon

Additionally, given the complexity of the new provision, the large number of individual taxpayers affected, and the need for stakeholders to have certainty with enough lead time, the IRS is planning for a threshold of $5,000 for tax year 2024 as part of a phase-in to implement the $600 reporting threshold enacted under the American Rescue Plan. It's unclear whether the IRS has the authority to change the reporting threshold—that should be in Congress’ hands. However, in its remarks related to the threshold change, the IRS cited a statute that gives broad authority to the Commissioner to administer the tax laws.

Taxpayers and tax professionals will likely be relieved to hear the news. There have long been concerns that the $600 threshold was far too low and result in millions of unnecessary Forms 1099-K, including those that reported personal transactions.

Notably, the $600 threshold has never been adjusted for inflation. However, if cost of living adjustments had been made each year since the 1954 (the year that section 6041 of the tax code was introduced), the $600 threshold would now be over $6,862.

Background

For years, taxpayers who provided certain goods or services worth more than $600 were responsible for issuing Form 1099-MISC. That changed in 2012 with the introduction of the new Form 1099-K.

Form 1099-K introduced a requirement for reportable payment transactions defined as payment card or third-party network transactions. Payment card transactions include accepting a card—such as a gift card, credit card, or debit card—for goods or services. A third-party network transaction is one that is settled through a third-party payment network, such as PayPal.

For the last few years, Form 1099-K required reporting when payments totaled more than $20,000 and more than 200 transactions are settled through a third-party network. No threshold applied to payment card transactions.

But, as I’ve written previously, the gap between the "old" Form 1099-MISC reporting threshold of $600 and the Form 1099-K reporting threshold of $20,000 was a cause for concern. The fix from Congress was a lower $600 threshold amount for Form 1099-K set to take effect in the 2022 tax year, meaning forms that would be distributed in early 2023. Instead, as noted, 2022 was treated as a transition year. 2023 will also serve as a transition year.

Rationale

According to the IRS, tax gap studies have consistently demonstrated that third-party income reporting significantly raises voluntary compliance with tax laws. For example, computerized document matching in the early 1980s—where the IRS matched data reported by third-party financial institutions to data reported by taxpayers—significantly reduced the underreporting of dividend and interest income. And the requirement that taxpayers supply Social Security numbers for dependent children resulted in marked differences in the numbers of dependents claimed on returns.

However, the IRS noted that expansion must be managed to ensure that Forms 1099-K are issued only to taxpayers who should receive them. In addition, it's important that taxpayers understand what to do and that tax preparers and software providers have the information they need to assist taxpayers.

Applicability

The IRS reminds taxpayers that reporting requirements do not apply to personal transactions such as birthday or holiday gifts, sharing the cost of a car ride or meal, or paying a family member or another for a household bill. These payments are not taxable and should not be reported on Form 1099-K.

However, the casual sale of goods and services, including selling used personal items like clothing, furniture, and other household items for a loss, could generate a Form 1099-K for many people, even if the seller has no tax liability from those sales.

And transactions in the course of business will be reportable on Form 1099-K if they reach the threshold.

What's next?

Following feedback from the tax community, the IRS plans to update Form 1040 and related schedules for 2024, to make the reporting process easier for taxpayers. The agency notes that these changes are complex and take time, so delaying changes to tax year 2024 allows for additional feedback.

The IRS says that the issues in distinguishing between types of personal and business transactions also factored into the IRS's decision to delay the reporting requirements an additional year and plan for a threshold of $5,000 for 2024 to phase in implementation.

"We spent many months gathering feedback from third-party groups and others, and it became increasingly clear we need additional time to effectively implement the new reporting requirements," said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. "Taking this phased-in approach is the right thing to do for the purposes of tax administration, and it prevents unnecessary confusion as we continue to look at changes to the Form 1040. It's clear that an additional delay for tax year 2023 will avoid problems for taxpayers, tax professionals and others in this area."

The result in good news for taxpayers and tax professionals. However, remember that the changes in the law apply to third-party reporting, not your individual tax obligations—those haven’t changed. It has always been the case that you must report your taxable income, whether it is payable to you in cash, on a credit card, through a business checking account, or through a cryptocurrency platform.
 
Posts: 32524 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
We need to keep up with this but at least it's some progress by the new speaker.
Eliminating this is the goal and no reason it can't be the next step as part of unwinding the misnamed deficit reduction act and it's huge spending increases.


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 9524 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^^^ I'm still wondering how the hell you're supposed to prove that you didn't make a profit on said guitar assuming you paid more than $800 for it. Or should people just expect to get audited up the ass every year. Fucking IRS. Fucking democrats Roll Eyes


simple solution, don't take electronic payment for anything you want to sell, and don't sell it on any e-commerce site that has the ability to monitor, track, allow bids on the transaction.

Post it on craigs list, facebook market and accept money orders, checks, cash only.

Do agree it's a bit aggressive but technically anything you sell is subject to income tax on the profit, they just never had the ability to monitor and have reported sales data to use for tax collection.

Zelle, Venmo, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Ebay, Amazon, and the other e-payment services now provide that access, so if people don't use them they have little to report and it reduces revenue making the services object to the $600 limit.

They'll have some rules and regulations for reporting costs, sellers will have to show a receipt for purchase, some kind of system to keep all receipts for maintenance repairs, upkeep, you'll have to download an app for $29.95 per year that is certified by the government to hold digital copies of said documents for review that you will submit with a tax form you sign digitally to record any costs against revenue.

It's going to be a data hog of information, the only people making big money is going to be Tech for the design of the app, creating the database and access screens as well as algorithms to look for things to investigate.

We all joke about the wartime industry and how it lobbies and pushes congress for bills with money to fund it and how it fills the pockets of lawmakers, well the Tech industry is probably second in line with this stuff. The amount of money spent to automate and implement new tech into the feds has to be staggering, it's also a core revenue source for many companies and consultants...

Hilarious result would be that the 1099 process creates reports of losses on sales that then become either tax deductions or result in zero taxable income negating any revenue increase and resulting in loss on the program due to the cost of managing it..
 
Posts: 23489 | Location: Florida | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
All in the quest for the pot of gold in missing tax revenue...which probably was calculated in excel by some freshly minted MBA at Booz Allen's Government Service group in hopes of securing follow on work to design the IRS's system to track and collect this mythological creature...

I feel like I'm getting closer to the juxtaposition of Atlas Shrugged and Idiocracy every year.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: December 09, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
Gotta make sure Zelenskyy's toilets get gold-plated, so fork it over, peasants.
 
Posts: 107636 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get my pies
outta the oven!

Picture of PASig
posted Hide Post
This should have never been a thing in the first place. You think these politicians that cooked this up are going to be subject to it? Just like they are subject to the insider trading laws they came up with...oh wait. Mad Roll Eyes


 
Posts: 33829 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Savor the limelight
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^^^ I'm still wondering how the hell you're supposed to prove that you didn't make a profit on said guitar assuming you paid more than $800 for it. Or should people just expect to get audited up the ass every year. Fucking IRS. Fucking democrats Roll Eyes


It’s super easy. You have a receipt that says you paid $1,500 for the guitar. No tax owed.
 
Posts: 10971 | Location: SWFL | Registered: October 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get my pies
outta the oven!

Picture of PASig
posted Hide Post
Now they're getting ready to start this crap back up. SMDH, our own government loses track of hundreds of billions of dollars a year but is now going to shake down people on Etsy and those with side hustles just trying to make it:

quote:

After delaying for two years, the IRS is planning to finally start implementing its new 1099-K reporting requirement for anyone earning income via third-party payment apps such as PayPal, Venmo, Zelle or Cash App.

The rule, which was originally slated to take effect in 2022 and was delayed for 2023, means that a 1099-K form "could be sent to anyone" using those services who makes over $600 per year, according to the agency.


IRS: Venmo, PayPal And CashApp Freelancers Face 2024 Reporting Requirements


 
Posts: 33829 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
My other Sig
is a Steyr.
Picture of .38supersig
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
quote:
Originally posted by .38supersig:
Big tech companies (eBay, PayPal, Venmo, Poshmark, CashApp) like big government.
I doubt they'll like the effect of this, though. This year a buddy reimbursed me over $1400 for materials I acquired on his behalf. We used Venmo.

Going forward: I will execute no single e-transaction, or aggregate of e-transactions with a singled individual, exceeding $599.

Period.

That means they'll be used for little more than splitting bar tabs and greens fees.

I doubt I'm alone.

Yup.

The year before this stuff started, I was up to $62,000 in eBay sales. I haven't sold anything through them in years and have no plans to do so.

I just as soon donate it to Goodwill and avoid the headache instead.




 
Posts: 9159 | Location: Somewhere looking for ammo that nobody has at a place I haven't been to for a pistol I couldn't live without... | Registered: December 02, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    IRS Postpones $600 per year 1099-K

© SIGforum 2024