SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Stupid question - submarine navigation
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Stupid question - submarine navigation Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mbinky:
quote:
Originally posted by maladat:
Modern high accuracy inertial navigation systems don't use actual physical spinning gyroscopes.

One variant I am familiar with shines lasers through coils of fiber optic cable. If you rotate the system around the axis of the coil, the end point of the coil moves, making the path of the light longer or shorter. They can measure that change in fractions of a wavelength and measure the rotation with incredible accuracy. 10 years ago I worked with one of these units that cost more than most cars and could maintain an accurate heading to within something absurd like a hundredth of a degree per hour.


In my past life I tested "FOG's" on ground combat vehicles (fiber optic gyroscopes). While they were 'faster' than the standard mechanical gyros we used they were no where near as robust. High failure rate. The 'instant on' feature was nice but to this day mechanicals are still in use (on tanks anyway). This includes the gyros for the fire control system and the inertial navigation.


Nowadays, mechanical gyros are mostly used for stabilization. Which lets tanks like the abrahms fire accurately on the move. Navigation grade gyros are typically fiber optic (FOG) or Ring Laser (RLG).
 
Posts: 1107 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: August 16, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by maladat:
Modern high accuracy inertial navigation systems don't use actual physical spinning gyroscopes.

One variant I am familiar with shines lasers through coils of fiber optic cable. If you rotate the system around the axis of the coil, the end point of the coil moves, making the path of the light longer or shorter. They can measure that change in fractions of a wavelength and measure the rotation with incredible accuracy. 10 years ago I worked with one of these units that cost more than most cars and could maintain an accurate three-axis heading to within something absurd like a hundredth of a degree.


"Active" is also sonar, just a different type.

Of course you are correct that a sub trying to be sneaky wouldn't be using their super fancy fish finder.


This is interesting. No moving parts?? It's hard to wrap my mind on anything that would work in place of a stable static reference such as a gyroscope.

The active sonar isn't a different type. It's the same sonar module except instead of receiving (changing a sound signal to an electrical signal), it's transmitting (changing an electrical signal to a sound signal). Just like plain headphones can be turned to microphones by plugging it into the microphone socket (I'm not talking about cell phone headphones with the microphone included).



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 20269 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PeteF:
Nowadays, mechanical gyros are mostly used for stabilization. Which lets tanks like the abrahms fire accurately on the move. Navigation grade gyros are typically fiber optic (FOG) or Ring Laser (RLG).


Interesting. We still use mechanical gyros in all of our navigation systems also. At least the three types of navigation units we use in the tank do.

I can see how the mechanical is used for sighting and fire control, it works. But unless us land based boys are behind the curve we still use the same for the INU.

Instant on is something we look for. Going from power on to stabilized in an instant would be a benfit. A FOG (or an RLG) would be great. Going from unstab to stab right after power up would be nice.

Not getting outside the box, the US Army runs an M1A1 with a certain type of INU, they have an M1A2 SEP with another type, and the USMC has a different M1A1 with yet a third type of navigation unit (the FEP tank). Because we need to be different. Ugg. And all still have spinning gyros.

Who knows maybe someday we will upgrade (the USMC will be last trust me. If it isn't free or at
least super cheap the USMC dosen't care. We are like the old neighborhood guy who still rolls his own cigarettes because he saves .03 cents a smoke...not that I am complining, and we still gets the job done, but...). Smile
 
Posts: 10645 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Run Silent
Run Deep

Picture of Patriot
posted Hide Post
On my boat, we had a large window in the front that was manned 24/7. There was also a wiper switch to keep the water off the window so the guy could see.

For other ships and boats in the area, we used the Marco-Polo sonar. One button pushed issued a “Marco” signal...the other issued a “Polo” signal if you were hailed.


_____________________________
Pledge allegiance or pack your bag!
The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
Spread my work ethic, not my wealth
 
Posts: 7105 | Location: South East, Pa | Registered: July 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
fugitive from reality
Picture of SgtGold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Patriot:
For other ships and boats in the area, we used the Marco-Polo sonar. One button pushed issued a “Marco” signal...the other issued a “Polo” signal if you were hailed.


 "Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only."


_____________________________
'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'.

 
Posts: 7171 | Location: Newyorkistan | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
california
tumbles into the sea
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bubbatime:
How do submarines navigate the oceans without running into under ground mountain ranges and shallow water?
We're in the lane and approaching the first turn.

Come left to course 195 in 30 seconds. Decrease depth to 200 meters. Maintain speed.

Captain, we are approaching the first turn.

Increase speed to 26 knots and recompute.

Aye Captain.

Navigator, recompute for 26 knots. Turn on my mark Five, four, three, two, one, mark. Diving control, come left to 195. Up on the bow planes.

Course now 195 and maintaining speed 26 knots.
 
Posts: 10665 | Location: NV | Registered: July 04, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too soon old,
too late smart
posted Hide Post
Well, all this explains why submariners always win at “pin the tail on the donkey.”
 
Posts: 4757 | Location: Southern Texas | Registered: May 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of maladat
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:
quote:
Originally posted by maladat:
Modern high accuracy inertial navigation systems don't use actual physical spinning gyroscopes.

One variant I am familiar with shines lasers through coils of fiber optic cable. If you rotate the system around the axis of the coil, the end point of the coil moves, making the path of the light longer or shorter. They can measure that change in fractions of a wavelength and measure the rotation with incredible accuracy. 10 years ago I worked with one of these units that cost more than most cars and could maintain an accurate three-axis heading to within something absurd like a hundredth of a degree.


"Active" is also sonar, just a different type.

Of course you are correct that a sub trying to be sneaky wouldn't be using their super fancy fish finder.


This is interesting. No moving parts?? It's hard to wrap my mind on anything that would work in place of a stable static reference such as a gyroscope.


Yep, no moving parts.

A traditional mechanical gyrocompass works by using gyroscopic precession to align a gyroscope with the axis of the rotation of the earth (since things on the surface of the earth rotate with the earth).

A fiber optic gyrocompass or ring laser gyrocompass just measures the rotation of the instrument itself with enough precision to detect the rotation of the earth directly (obviously it has to do this over some period of time, while subtracting out the local movement of the instrument).

quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:
The active sonar isn't a different type. It's the same sonar module except instead of receiving (changing a sound signal to an electrical signal), it's transmitting (changing an electrical signal to a sound signal). Just like plain headphones can be turned to microphones by plugging it into the microphone socket (I'm not talking about cell phone headphones with the microphone included).


I meant that it's different in use - listening to the sounds produced by other objects vs. generating sound that bounces off of other objects and listening for the echo.

Also, I would be somewhat surprised if there weren't separate active and passive sonar transducers (and possibly separate transmitting and receiving transducers for active sonar) - I expect the range of frequencies of interest would be different, and I expect you could make a transducer more sensitive if it didn't have to pump out super high-power sound pulses.

I was confused by your comment "Sonar is for passive listening. If you go active..." It sounded like you were saying active sonar isn't sonar. Obviously that isn't what you meant.
 
Posts: 6320 | Location: CA | Registered: January 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by maladat:

quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:
The active sonar isn't a different type. It's the same sonar module except instead of receiving (changing a sound signal to an electrical signal), it's transmitting (changing an electrical signal to a sound signal). Just like plain headphones can be turned to microphones by plugging it into the microphone socket (I'm not talking about cell phone headphones with the microphone included).


I meant that it's different in use - listening to the sounds produced by other objects vs. generating sound that bounces off of other objects and listening for the echo.

Also, I would be somewhat surprised if there weren't separate active and passive sonar transducers (and possibly separate transmitting and receiving transducers for active sonar) - I expect the range of frequencies of interest would be different, and I expect you could make a transducer more sensitive if it didn't have to pump out super high-power sound pulses.

I was confused by your comment "Sonar is for passive listening. If you go active..." It sounded like you were saying active sonar isn't sonar. Obviously that isn't what you meant.


Somehow, I fascinated with the no moving part. I'll try to find out more when I have the time.

I can confirm it's only one type of sonar transducers. I've removed them myself from the submarine nose, standing on rebars and manually wrenching the rusted nuts loose. I've also worked on refurbishing them once off the sub. There wasn't no attempt to differentiate one transducer from another.

If there is any differentiation which also makes sense to me as 1) you may not want to ping all around but just to a particular section away fro the sub and 2) you don't want to lag while switching from pinging to listening, the difference must be in the electronics in the sonar control equipment since you don't need all the modules to ping. But I'd think you'd want all to be able to listen also since you wouldn't want to waste the ability.



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 20269 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Stupid question - submarine navigation

© SIGforum 2024