SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    How much more oil could the US produce?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How much more oil could the US produce? Login/Join 
Member
posted
A question for tatortodd and other O&G guys, particularly on the upstream production side of the equation.

All things being ideal, just how much more oil could the US squeeze out of the ground, say in the next 12-36 months? Let's assume $60-90/barrel prices, rig availability, pipeline capacity in place, federal and state permitting is optimized, and access to capital is also ideal.

Current levels are 11.6M to 12.0M BOPD, even with Sleepy Joe in office.

I'm curious with OPEC+ announcing a 2M cutback (world production appears to be around 80M barrels oil/day), could the US get to 14-16M BOPD?


P229
 
Posts: 3981 | Location: Sacramento, CA | Registered: November 21, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
We'd do a lot better if we have a long term plan that didn't get government interference based on which party is in power.
The private ventures that actually have to own and operate the means of production have to read the tea leaves and constantly adjust for the possibilities. No such problem in many of the other oil producing countries.
That uncertainty discourages the longer term planning that would be most efficient for our domestic production.

According to Forbes, the highest BPD was 13 million so under the right circumstances it would seem those numbers are possible.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/r...ion/?sh=6fc2214b6b6f


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 9986 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
The private ventures that actually have to own and operate the means of production have to read the tea leaves and constantly adjust for the possibilities.
That uncertainty discourages the longer term planning that would be most efficient for our domestic production.

That's the problem. The greenie socialists control the Dem party and want it all stopped. They are stupid, short sighted, and self destructive. But they represent half the population.

It's not just producing crude either. It's refinery capacity.

My daughter works as an engineer in an oil refinery. In her opinion, and that of many other oil execs, we will never build another large scale oil refinery in the US.

Ask yourself, what would be better for this country? Another trip to the moon? Or another oil refinery?



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24881 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
Ask yourself, what would be better for this country? Another trip to the moon? Or another oil refinery?
If that rocket included all current elected Dem's and their supporters, then the trip to the moon. Wink


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
in the end karma
always catches up
posted Hide Post
I read an article a few weeks ago while I was trying to figure out the disparity in price between gas and diesel. The article really focuses on the loss of refinery capacity over the last couple of decades. It basically said that even if we produced at maximum capacity the refinerys couldn’t keep up.


" The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State" Art 1 Sec 32 Indiana State Constitution

YAT-YAS
 
Posts: 3751 | Location: Northwest, In | Registered: December 03, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Valpo Fz:
I read an article a few weeks ago while I was trying to figure out the disparity in price between gas and diesel. The article really focuses on the loss of refinery capacity over the last couple of decades. It basically said that even if we produced at maximum capacity the refinerys couldn’t keep up.

It's been a while since I studied it but historically refinery capacity has been the big constraint. Last I looked it's been years since a new refinery has been built. Only upgrades to existing facilities mainly due to regulatory requirements and NIMBY attitudes.
 
Posts: 2117 | Location: Just outside of Zion and Bryce Canyon NP's | Registered: March 18, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted Hide Post
I've heard that as well. If it's true we're screwed, sorta. Unless common sense prevails again.




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9099 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A teetotaling
beer aficionado
Picture of NavyGuy
posted Hide Post
I've not researched this but the one thing I can fall back on is; just before Trump left office, it was declared we where energy independent with no need to buy foreign oil, and actually comfortably selling excess to friendly countries and our strategic reserves were overflowing.



Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are once more slaves.

-D.H. Lawrence
 
Posts: 11524 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: February 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Production is not the issue

Required Permits to drill new holes (.gov hiding behind the “we opened up all the leases)

And refinery capability (hasn’t been a new refinery built in decades) current refinery’s set up for heavy dirty crude and not the light sweet crude we have the most of domestically

Are the 2 biggest issues


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live today as if it may be your last and learn today as if you will live forever
 
Posts: 6322 | Location: New Orleans...outside the levees, fishing in the Rigolets | Registered: October 11, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bigdeal:
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
Ask yourself, what would be better for this country? Another trip to the moon? Or another oil refinery?
If that rocket included all current elected Dem's and their supporters, then the trip to the moon. Wink


Simple and true. What’s not to like?


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 9986 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Drill Here, Drill Now
Picture of tatortodd
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Russ59:
A question for tatortodd and other O&G guys, particularly on the upstream production side of the equation.

All things being ideal, just how much more oil could the US squeeze out of the ground, say in the next 12-36 months? Let's assume $60-90/barrel prices, rig availability, pipeline capacity in place, federal and state permitting is optimized, and access to capital is also ideal.

Current levels are 11.6M to 12.0M BOPD, even with Sleepy Joe in office.

I'm curious with OPEC+ announcing a 2M cutback (world production appears to be around 80M barrels oil/day), could the US get to 14-16M BOPD?
I wish to remain employed so I'll only post from publicly available sources (e.g EIA).

A picture tells a thousand words and the pictured graph speaks volumes about US domestic production not being where we were before COVID:


We've been at 13.0M so that's achievable. EIA's short-term energy outlook (STEO) thru 2023 will next be published next week, and the longer term EIA report is from prior to Russia invading Ukraine (i.e. not worth reading and next one is Feb '23). However, STEO from a month ago is forecasting:
  • about 1.0M BOED increase in domestic production by year end 2023. In other words, it matches my statement that returning to pre-COVID domestic production capability is likely in the near-term.
  • roughly 1.0M BOED increase in domestic refining by year end 2023.

    Industry news and local Houston news is full of stories about Gulf Coast refineries are building / have built more capacity to refine West Texas and New Mexico crude oil. Pipelines have been built to get West Texas and New Mexico crude oil to the refineries.

    When looking at refining capacity on EIA's site in same time period as domestic oil production graph, I see:
  • 2.2M BOED increase despite the dozens and dozens of refinery closures. In other words, significant expansion within existing fenceline. The problem with no new refineries and 0 refineries between florida and Deleware is local shortages from natural and manmade disasters.
  • Refining capacity is down from PreCOVID levels. Too tired to grab a link, but I've read many industry news stories this year about many planned turnarounds were deferred due to workforce challenges during COVID and as a result there are numerous 2022 turnarounds.



    Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity

    DISCLAIMER: These are the author's own personal views and do not represent the views of the author's employer.
  •  
    Posts: 23957 | Location: Northern Suburbs of Houston | Registered: November 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
      Powered by Social Strata  
     

    SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    How much more oil could the US produce?

    © SIGforum 2024