Who needs to be armed though, right?

He mischaracterized the circumstances. That was a deception. The resistance to Kamala is not her sex. It is her Marxism and imbecilic behavior. This is how otherwise normal people see what everyone else sees and draws incorrect conclusions.

The way "his" world works is going change a little bit. What a dunce.

I've been trying to think of a snappy comeback for this anal-pore but it isn't worth the investment.

Simply put, if someone tells you he wants you dead I'd say you should believe him and act accordingly. FAFO, prof.

Can I just get winged if the commie under china influence nut pushes me out of voting for the incompetent liar marxist flip flopper without any political instincts, policy understanding, and who is clueless of foreign policy understanding?

quote:

Originally posted by PowerSurge:
Bring it on Mr. Soon-to-be-fired

Probably has tenure, can say anything he likes to young impressionable minds.

^^^^^^^^^^
Probably not. He knew he just fucked up. "Did I say that?...Scrap that from the recording. I don't want the Dean to hear that I said that".

The day leftists actually try to put their violent desires into practice will be a day there are a LOT less of them around. I’m not even slightly unnerved by these cretin.

The interesting bit is it’s students outing these communist fucks among the faculty.

quote:

Originally posted by markand:
Executing those who disagree with you? Of course!

You mean I can be wrong?

Though, I admit, I think we’d all be happier if the Democrats were sent to Europe.

I'm sure it's not lost you any of you, but I noticed he didn't indicate he wanted the clip removed because it misrepresented his beliefs. He wanted the clip removed because he accidently said the quiet part out loud. Once again, the "tolerant left" lets slip they want to murder people who simply disagree with them. As long as it doesn't upset the Dean, of course.

So, have we heard from the Dean yet?

I would not want to look inside Prof.Lowcock's closet.

Let's all meet Professor Phil Lowcock, shall we.

I wonder what his thoughts would be if MTG were running.
I'm guessing not the same.

I'll take "Career-ending comments for $200," Alex.

Admissions to these indoctrination centers is competitive.

From the article link in OP…




The comments were made by Professor Phil Lowcock, the director of international student-athlete support who works in the university's Health Sport and Exercise Sciences department.

…

"The instructor offers his sincerest apologies and deeply regrets the situation. His intent was to emphasize his advocacy for women's rights and equality, and he recognized he did a very poor job of doing so," the university said.


A) WTF does any political or gender ideology diatribe have to do in a class related to “international student-athlete support” or “Health Sport and Exercise Sciences”?

B) Bullshit on his “sincerest apology”. He is only sorry he didn’t think before running his cuck holster. I would actually have a sliver of respect for the piece of crap if he had the balls to reply, “I said what I said and I mean it”. Instead he has no conviction and wilts in the wind putting out the now standard “apologetic retraction” that is about as sincere as me telling the cockroach I stepped on “Sorry dude”.



I guess if trying to kill the candidate you don’t like doesn’t work, “Plan B” is to kill those who support him. How about a little “pre-emptive self-defense”?

quote:

Originally posted by Bassamatic:
Tulsi Gabbard, yeah, probably. Margaret Thatcher, most definitely, Golda Meir, definitely.

Ditto It's this turnip running now that I can't consider or MRS Clinton