Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Info Guru![]() |
In the case mentioned in the original post, it's about a house that is well kept, but they decided to paint it like Starry Night. The law defines graffiti as painting or markings made on personal property, without the consent of the owner. So by definition the painting is not graffiti, so how can you support the magistrate's decision? “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” - John Adams | |||
|
safe & sound![]() |
I'm not an art history major either, but I believe that's supposed to be Van Gogh himself. Notice he's holding a paint brush. ![]() ![]()
Sure it is. I'll explain why. Mount Dora does not define what the word means. Others do. When it comes down to a gray area, justice is supposed to hear arguments of facts, and definitions of words are important. But you're right. It's not relevant in this case because the Magistrate already agreed with me (and Broward County). He said it is not "Grafitti", that it is a "Sign". Now we need to argue the definition of "signs". | |||
|
אַרְיֵה![]() |
Where did I say that Mount Dora defines the word? On the other hand, I believe that you said Broward county defines the word. ![]() הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים | |||
|
I have not yet begun to procrastinate |
^^^THIS^^^ I had neighbors across the street that liked to party late. Really late. I never called any enforcement on them when I can plainly hear the music, I just turned up my TV. The other option was grab a beer and go join them. Life's too short to let stuff eat on you. Be enough of a pain to neighbors and you might end up living next to a neon pink house! ![]() -------- After the game, the King and the pawn go into the same box. | |||
|
safe & sound![]() |
I’m assuming you didn’t read their ordinance at all. Had you read it you may have noticed that a key word was not defined. This is important because.....
That is an example where they define the word in a commonly understood fashion. If you’re going to charge somebody with a crime, the crime must be defined. It’s difficult to follow the rules if they are vague. I defined the word. Miriam Webster defines the word. Broward County defines the word. The Magistrate in Mount Dora defines the word. In every one of those examples the alleged crime did not fit the definition. That is why the Magistrate changed the charge from graffiti to signage in a residential area. If you would spend some time reading ordinances and other laws you’ll find that everything tends to be specific and defined. They do that for a reason. Whomever is writing these things for Mount Dora is not doing the municipality or it’s residents any favors. Even with the switch I believe the municipality is grasping at straws. I read the ordinances and did not find a single one that says what his homeowner did is a violation. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|