Eric Hovde’s Wisconsin Senate Race Opens the Door to a Criminal Investigation

https://www.americanthinker.co...l_investigation.html


The Democrats may have made a significant mistake in their all-too-obvious attempt to steal a U.S. Senate seat from GOP candidate Eric Hovde. As Hovde explained in a November 12 video, in the early hours of November 6, 2024, he received congratulatory calls for his apparent win. Then, suddenly, by 4:00 am, “a staggering 108,000 absentee ballots were dumped from Milwaukee, with two-term incumbent Senator [and Democrat candidate] Tammy Baldwin receiving nearly 90 percent of those votes.” Hovde objected: “Statistically, this outcome seemed improbable, as it didn’t match the patterns from same-day voting in Milwaukee, where I received 22 percent of the votes.”

The problem for Democrats is that the late-night drop of an improbable 108,000 thousand absentee ballots that were nearly all for the Democrat candidate fitted an all-too-recognizable pattern of election fraud made possible by cryptographic algorithms embedded covertly in the official State Board of Elections (SBOE) voter registration database. Unfortunately for the Democrats, Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., had previously found an illegal clandestine algorithm in the SBOE voter rolls. As reported on GodsFiveStones.com, Paquette concludes:

This study of Wisconsin’s voter rolls reveals strong evidence of multiple ID number assignment algorithms, with two appearing over-engineered, enabling data segregation and hidden assignment. The presence of over 60,000 records with encrypted ID numbers further suggests hidden attributes, potentially violating public disclosure laws.

Paquette has also discovered similar illegal cryptographic algorithms in New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona, with algorithms yet to be reported also found in New Jersey, Texas, and Hawaii.

In common sense parlance, the algorithms are an intelligence-grade complexity mathematical scheme that facilitates creating and hiding false voters who receive legitimate state voter IDs. After making the false voter records, the criminals responsible for embedding the algorithm in the database can hide the false records so that they can be recovered by an algorithm locator number known only to the criminals. The criminals’ favorite targets for creating duplicate clone voter records are inactive voters, deceased voters, and voters who have moved out of the state.

By creating duplicate “clones” of these records, the criminals have exploited a voter record that should have been purged to produce a second “nonexistent” voter registration duplicate that can be double-voted in mail-in ballot schemes that are difficult to detect. State officials turning a blind eye to the late dropping of thousands of mail-in votes favorable to Democrats strive to block forensic examination of the mail-in ballots that almost certainly would have detected the fraud by identifying mail-in ballots that were never mailed, signatures on mail-in ballots that do not match signatures on registration cards, failure to date mail-in ballots properly, and in community canvassing to see if qualified registered voters live at the addresses to which the fraudulent mail-in ballots were supposed to have been mailed.

Searching the Wisconsin SBOE voter registration database, Paquette discovered that a search of voter names and phone numbers yielded 2,471,519 matched clone voter records in a database of 7,744,986 voter records, nearly one-third of the SBOE voter records on file. Startled by these results, Paquette commented:

"Wisconsin’s clone records significantly outnumber those in other states, potentially matching New York’s total despite having only a third as many registered voters. This fare exceeds any normal error rate or acceptable administrative standard. Alarmingly, new clone records have increased dramatically year-over-year for over two decades, potentially surpassing legal registrations within years.

These findings indicate potentially unethical management of Wisconsin’s voter roll records. Regardless of intent, the algorithm’s use creates a hidden classification system for data segregation, posing a security risk. The large number of cloned records exacerbates this risk, as such records would be of particular interest to those seeking to misuse voter roles—a concern recently realized when Wisconsin mailed absentee ballots to inactive voters."


In a statement issued on November 13, Hovde objected:


"Since last Wednesday, numerous parties have reached out to me about voting inconsistencies, such as certain voting precincts in Milwaukee having a turnout of over 150% of registered voters, and in some cases, over 200%. Additionally, in 2020, President Biden received 10 million more votes than Vice President Harris did last Tuesday. Yet in Milwaukee, even though the population has declined and registered voters decreased by 26,330, and early voting numbers were down, somehow, Harris received only 1,100 fewer votes than Biden did, which is not consistent with most major cities. This was accomplished by same-day registration that surged by almost 50% on a rainy day. Many people have reached out and urged me to contest the election.”

On Monday, November 18, Hovde conceded without asking for a recount. Since the margin of defeat was less than 1 percent, he would have had to pay for the recount.

In the 12 days between the election and the concession, Hovde was heavily criticized for not conceding immediately. Sam Liebert, the leftist Wisconsin state director for All Voting Is Local, charged at a news conference that Hovde’s statements constituted “a direct attempt to cast doubt on our fair and free elections” and said that Hovde’s refusal to concede is “not only disappointing but also unnecessary.”

Another problem for Hovde is that a recount would not allow a forensic examination of the mail-in ballots, while a computer search of falsified mail-in votes would be certified because the state ID numbers assigned “false clone voters” would show up within the SBOE computers with matching numbers requesting a mail-in ballot and casting a ballot with the same number that was tabulated.

Moreover, Wisconsin has a 45-day window to complete certification, allowing very little time to organize a challenge to the federal district courts to challenge the election results on suspicion that a large enough number of algorithm-assisted “clone voting” records could be found in a forensic examination of the mail-in ballots to substantiate claims of election fraud. Final counts showed 108,000 absentee and provisional ballots from Milwaukee in the early hours of Wednesday, November 6, went 82 percent for Baldwin, according to the Milwaukee Election Commission—a percentage perhaps calculated to be more in line with the 75 percent of the in-person votes cast for Baldwin in Milwaukee on election day.

In conclusion, those playing “21” in a casino found to be using marked cards have a justifiable claim that the casino cannot prove the player lost any hand played. Similarly, how can anyone certify any election as legitimate based on an SBOE voter registration database riddled with clandestine cryptographic algorithms, in which nearly one-third of all voter records are suspected to be illegal duplicates? How could the SBOE officials possibly prove Hovde lost when cryptographic algorithms could have been responsible for producing a suspicious early morning drop containing enough fraudulent mail-in ballots from Milwaukee to steal an election from Hovde—an election Hovde had been winning until the suspicious drop occurred?

A criminal investigation in which an honest forensic examination of the SBOE computers and the mail-in physical ballots should provide helpful information to answer these outstanding questions.

In full disclosure, our offer to assist a Hovde campaign challenge to the election results has not resulted in a response from the Hovde campaign to proceed. We at GodsFiveStones.com reserve the right to present our findings to any criminal investigation of election fraud that a reconstituted Department of Justice under Trump administration control may care to pursue.

I'm shocked....

a lying, cheating democrat stealing an election by fraudulent votes?

So, do I understand that a “recount” would NOT have found and corrected these fraudulent activities?
It’s not clear from the article—interesting though it is—whether Hovde has any recourse. An “investigation” might take a long time.

quote:

Originally posted by sjtill:
So, do I understand that a “recount” would NOT have found and corrected these fraudulent activities?
It’s not clear from the article—interesting though it is—whether Hovde has any recourse. An “investigation” might take a long time.

Hovde did not ask for a recounts because a recount just counts the same votes over and does not look for fraudulent ballots. Same shit has been going on in Minnesota.

It sounds from the article—and I went to the original link to read it again—that the sticking point is perhaps the Hovde campaign’s failure to jump on the offer of assistance in filing a criminal complaint. Is that right?

Interesting. No one has ever provided a satisfactory explanation of what happened election night 2020 when they stopped reporting results in those six states and then in the morning amazingly Biden took the lead in all six with Trumps vote totals barely changing. Sorry but "trust us, no proof was found" doesn't convince me. Broward County Florida with Brenda Snipes 2018 was another huge eye opener.

Have Milwaukee and Madison count and report their numbers FIRST.

Trump ought to have the DOJ launch an investigation into election fraud and put people in jail. Might be to late to do anything about this election but it could impact future elections. As long as nothing is done to stop election fraud, especially blatant election fraud it will just continue.

quote:

Originally posted by heydrich:
Have Milwaukee and Madison count and report their numbers FIRST.

All that would do is cause the dems to include all the bogus votes up front instead of waiting to "discover" them later.

quote:

Originally posted by calugo:
Trump ought to have the DOJ launch an investigation into election fraud and put people in jail. Might be to late to do anything about this election but it could impact future elections. As long as nothing is done to stop election fraud, especially blatant election fraud it will just continue.

Bingo. As long as there are no consequences, the behavior will continue. People need to be prosecuted AND do some serious prison time. And not in some country club prison either.

Similar horseshit was tried in PA W Bob Casey...

We should build a few new Supermax prisons for the traitors and election fraudsters.

quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:
We should build a few new Supermax prisons for the traitors and election fraudsters.

Gallows are cheaper.

2020 was cheat by mail.

Jerome Corsi is a talented writer and a good investigator. He also works with some people who know how to get to the bottom of things. His reporting should be taken seriously.

You knew this was going to happen, simply from the repeated declarations from the DNC prior to the election that the Republicans would resort to fraud and steal the election.

To date, everything they've accused others of doing, they have actually been doing behind the scenes.

108,000 absentee votes from a city with ~600,000 ? Sounds realistic.

Maybe we can try to do something about it three days before the next election four years from now.

quote:

Originally posted by DennisM:
Gallows are cheaper.

In theory anyway.. many many many thousands of men died so we could have free honest elections in this country. It's supposed to be one of our most precious freedoms. But it's become like war in this country, people have become so far removed from the reality of it in the last 4-5 generations that it doesn't seem real, it has no consequences. This isn't a game. These people are betraying everything the country is supposed to be about. Committing a form of treason. I would 100% support the death penalty for election fraud.

^^^

This. Right. Here.

If people thought they would absolutely die if caught, far less would be willing to give it a go. No jail, no parole for good behavior, only the finality of certain death with ZERO exceptions.

quote:

Originally posted by cas:
These people are betraying everything the country is supposed to be about. Committing a form of treason. I would 100% support the death penalty for election fraud.

People in my "extended circle" think it's hyperbole when I say that. Nope... I'm absolutely serious. If convicted after a fair trial with all of the Constitution's safeguards and Due Process protections, punish election fraud as the actual treason that it is.

Hopefully it'd deter. I'm still OK with the punishment if it doesn't.