Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Age Quod Agis |
It's kind of like buying a watch. You need to understand the difference between "resistant" and "proof". They are different things, and the meanings vary wildly. "I vowed to myself to fight against evil more completely and more wholeheartedly than I ever did before. . . . That’s the only way to pay back part of that vast debt, to live up to and try to fulfill that tremendous obligation." Alfred Hornik, Sunday, December 2, 1945 to his family, on his continuing duty to others for surviving WW II. | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
I'm telling you, one day we are going to find out (and not hopefully too late) that TikTok was a Chinese weapon designed to destroy our nation from within. | |||
|
Make America Great Again |
As a child raised in the south, I had unsupervised access to a firearm all the time, and I knew where the ammo was kept. However, I also knew better than to touch the thing when my father wasn't helping me! Why? Because my father taught me better than that, and also preached firearm safety! I repeat: I was taught by my father... something that seems very lacking in these days and times! _____________________________ I just can't quit grinnin' from all of this winnin'! ____________________________ Bill R. North Alabama | |||
|
Freethinker |
Taught or not taught, children do not have the mature judgment to be trusted with unsupervised access to firearms. The fact that some, or even many, are exceptions to that rule doesn’t change the fact that it’s true of the others or that it’s impossible to know which ones do and which ones don’t unless it’s demonstrated in a specific case like this one. And such incidents didn’t just start in the past X number of years. If anything, I suspect that they are less common these days than in my youth 60+ years ago, for example. Whether they are or not, a show of hands: How many were taught as a teenager, sometimes as clearly as possible, to avoid doing dangerous things, and yet did them anyway because we knew the dangerous stuff didn’t apply to us? Yeah, disregard. I don’t want to embarrass anyone, including myself. Children cannot be sheltered from all dangerous activities, but unsupervised access to firearms is one that’s relatively easy to prevent, and therefore should be. My opinion means nothing, but if someone disagrees and tragedy results, look no further than the nearest mirror to see who was at fault. ► 6.4/93.6 “Most men … can seldom accept the simplest and most obvious truth if it … would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions … which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabrics of their lives.” — Leo Tolstoy | |||
|
Muzzle flash aficionado |
Many kids today do not receive the harsh discipline that was common when I was a child. Harsh does not equate to abuse, either--it was "tough love" and intended to instill respect for others and proper behavior. My dad was not mean or abusive, but he was not shy about using his belt on a few occasions. I learned quickly that when he gave direction, it was to be obeyed. His guns and ammo were not locked up, but they were in the parents' bedroom and I would no more have gone there and touched them without his permission than I could fly. Yet his love for me was never in question, and he forbade me very few things in my life. He was a good father, and I miss him (died in 1984). flashguy Texan by choice, not accident of birth | |||
|
half-genius, half-wit |
That's a great epitaph, FG. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |