^^^^^^^^that’s exactly why the marriage bond is so important to the fabric of society.

If someone doesn’t want to “recognize” my marriage because it didn’t occur in a church and was not performed by some self-appointed interpreter of his particular god’s will, continue to enjoy your prideful sanctimony.

For those who evidently have no understanding of history or knowledge of human culture outside of their own circumscribed existence, countless couples have lived in exclusive partnerships based on expressed promises to remain faithful to each other without any sort of religious sanction. The reasons for such relationships extend back to the earliest evolutionary bases, and are even seen among some of the “lower” animals. Among humans, the only reason such partnerships become uncommon and no longer needed is when the influencers of the society decide that they can do a better job of producing good members than can family units.

My wife and I have each been married only once and our relationship has been totally faithfully for 42+ years without approval or assistance from any supernatural force.

https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1887186172532957414

quote:

Originally posted by architect:
Not too hard to understand. A marriage does not involve only the two people in it, there are relatives and others who have a stake in it, and their religious sensitivities are worthy of consideration. Even complete strangers have a perspective on a marriage if only to respect the bond that a man and a woman share.

Of course, there are millennia of ceremonial traditions that are expected to be observed in society as well. Would you toss these out as fake bullshit?

I don't think that any particular religious adherence is necessary for those entering a marriage, and not being Churchy doesn't mean one's life is worth any less than those who are.

Um, no. First I never said someone’s life is less or more than someone else’s. Not what I said in the least and don’t really appreciate that inference, because it’s dead wrong, and awful, really awful. And churchy? What is that exactly? Is that some slight to people who attend mass or Church services?

I am well aware there are others involved. Family being considered sure, but complete strangers? You lost me there. But make no mistake, a marriage vow, is first and foremost a commitment to God. You are making a promise to God almighty when you do it. That supersedes everything else. Anything and everything else is secondary. My point was not about non-religious people getting married. They can write their own vows and talk about the moon for all I care. I was referring to the bs. Is it in the Bible to purchase a diamond engagement ring? Nope. Up until 100 years ago the diamonds were next to worthless. It was DeBeers and an ad campaign in newspapers all over the country pushing the narrative. So yeah, that’s fake to me, big time. A false ad campaign and marketing narrative doesn’t make it reality. That’s literally a cartel creating a ceremonial tradition out of thin air to make money. And so are these ludicrous ceremonies costing tens of thousands of dollars. If they want to do it, hey it’s a free country, I just think the cost has gone insane. People that don’t even believe in God, yet recite Biblical vows by a preacher or Priest for show? No, I will never understand that.

And look, we don’t have to all agree either. It’s a free country. I never said anything about recognizing this and that, nor putting anyone above or below, nothing of the sort. My post and comments were about the ridiculous industry that this is today. The insane costs, and nothing more. And how that has, I take that back, how that has already superseded the sacrament and sacred union.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:


https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1887186172532957414

[FLASH_VIDEO]<iframe id="twitter-widget-1" scrolling="no" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&lang=en&theme=&id=1887186172532957414" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 552px; display: block; border: medium; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-image: url('https://codejanitor.net/embeds/images/bgmessage.png'); background-position: center 85px; background-size: 200px; overflow: hidden;" title="Twitter Tweet"></iframe>[/FLASH_VIDEO]

The snowflake melting down in the back is priceless!

The lil' faggot in the background made it way more entertaining ...

He was just groovin' to the beat

https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1887346226875834416

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:


https://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/1887186172532957414

Pure 'Mace in the Face' right there!

quote:

Originally posted by downeastnc1:
The lil' faggot in the background made it way more entertaining ...

The one with his boyfriends jockstrap on his face?

Those trannies have penises. Keep them out of the girls locker room.

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:

OMG! 3 Trannys with stiff shafts!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: parabellum,

quote:

The lil' faggot in the background made it way more entertaining ...

He's got his own jet airplane, and he's a millionaire.

^^^^
And electrical plugs, gas nozzles, coin slots, chip-card readers…not that these folks have a shred of sanity, but boy are they desperate to fight windmills.

FWIW, the wife does some work that is funded by the FED Gov. In the past, it required her to ask a series of questions, "for tracking purposes", to know if all "communities" were being served.
She started a new project yesterday and lo and behold the "mandatory" LGBQRSTLMNOP questions are GONE.

Even CNN is blown away by the huge percentage of people in the country that oppose tranny freaks in women sports.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/...ansgender-dispute%2F

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1887480014062457077

[FLASH_VIDEO]<iframe id="twitter-widget-1" scrolling="no" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&lang=en&theme=&id=1887480014062457077" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 801px; display: block; border: medium; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-image: url('https://codejanitor.net/embeds/images/bgmessage.png'); background-position: center 85px; background-size: 200px; overflow: hidden;" title="Twitter Tweet"></iframe>[/FLASH_VIDEO]

Yep, it is! Absolutely! No doubt about it! LEGO hates the alphabet community! You shouldn’t let your alphabet kids play with LEGO! I’d march in the streets if I were you

Actually, I like the Lego analogy.

Let these retards try to build a Lego Death Star (or even an X-Wing) WITHOUT male/female parts, and see how far they can get.

Turns out, male and female parts ARE 'normal,' and the Lego system cannot function without recognizing this. . .

quote:

Originally posted by egregore:

quote:

The lil' faggot in the background made it way more entertaining ...

He's got his own jet airplane, and he's a millionaire.

Money for nothin and chicks for free.

Your turn.