SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Supreme Court refuses to hear GM appeal on ignition deaths
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Supreme Court refuses to hear GM appeal on ignition deaths Login/Join 
High standards,
low expectations
Picture of Surefire
posted
Unbelievable they tried to wash the blood off their hands while hiding behind a bailout paid for by the taxes of the very people they killed/injured.
I'll never buy one of your products, GM.

From the article:
"GM, supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, said under the federal bankruptcy code, its 2009 bankruptcy sale to a new government-owned entity made it "free and clear" of former liabilities."

Linky to article




The reward for hard work, is more hard work arcwelder76, 2013
 
Posts: 5252 | Location: Edmonton AB, Canada | Registered: July 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
One of the many reasons I will never own any GM trash.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 34587 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Told cops where to go for over 29 years…
Picture of 911Boss
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mars_Attacks:
One of the many reasons I will never own any GM trash.


Ditto.






What part of "...Shall not be infringed" don't you understand???


 
Posts: 11423 | Location: Western WA state for just a few more years... | Registered: February 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
My father was a WWII vet and owned GM cars up until the last 8 years of his life. After the bailout he bought a Toyota Camry and was tickled pink with it. I'll never own GM.
 
Posts: 7783 | Registered: October 31, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
Was the real party in interest the "old" GM, or the "new" GM?

The way bankruptcy can work, among others, is that the assets of the bankrupt entity are sold, liquidated, turned into cash, which is distributed to creditors. Those claims are terminated and the bankrupt entity ceases to exist. This is the basic Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy.

The buyer(s) of the assets, which might include receivables, factories, designs, rights, trademarks, tooling, etc. takes those assets free and clear of prior claims.

The company which made and sold 2008 Chevies, etc. and all prior products no longer exists. Claims against that entity were discharged in bankruptcy. The new entity should be free of those liabilities.

There are obviously some rules, agreements, settlements in the case of GM that may have altered this basic arrangement. Maybe GM did not file a Chapter 7, but an arrangement with creditors, Chapter 11, but if that were true, it would not be claiming to be free and clear of pre existing liabilities.

If it were this simple, it wouldn't be taking the time and resources of the appellate court or the Supreme Court.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Info Guru
Picture of BamaJeepster
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
Was the real party in interest the "old" GM, or the "new" GM?

The way bankruptcy can work, among others, is that the assets of the bankrupt entity are sold, liquidated, turned into cash, which is distributed to creditors. Those claims are terminated and the bankrupt entity ceases to exist. This is the basic Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy.

The buyer(s) of the assets, which might include receivables, factories, designs, rights, trademarks, tooling, etc. takes those assets free and clear of prior claims.

The company which made and sold 2008 Chevies, etc. and all prior products no longer exists. Claims against that entity were discharged in bankruptcy. The new entity should be free of those liabilities.

There are obviously some rules, agreements, settlements in the case of GM that may have altered this basic arrangement. Maybe GM did not file a Chapter 7, but an arrangement with creditors, Chapter 11, but if that were true, it would not be claiming to be free and clear of pre existing liabilities.

If it were this simple, it wouldn't be taking the time and resources of the appellate court or the Supreme Court.


GM filed a Chapter 11 reorganization:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...er_11_reorganization

From what I could glean after going over the article a couple of times is that all these lawsuits were thrown out by a bankruptcy judge in 2015. Then the 2nd Circuit reversed that ruling and said that the lawsuits could proceed. GM appealed to SCOTUS and they refused to hear it, leaving the 2nd Circuit ruling in place.

GM is not happy with the ruling.



“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
- John Adams
 
Posts: 29408 | Location: In the red hinterlands of Deep Blue VA | Registered: June 29, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:

GM is not happy with the ruling.


Well, boo frickin-hoo for GM. Maybe they should invest more effort into not killing their customers and in developing sound, viable, long-range business plans instead of all these maneuvers aimed at avouding their own responsibility.

I swore off GM after the whole govt bail-out thing. This only validates that decision.



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21968 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nosce te ipsum
Picture of Woodman
posted Hide Post
A couple years ago when this was making headlines, GM had $20B cash on hand. Right now it is $24 billion.

https://ycharts.com/companies/GM/cash_on_hand

While my math is often faulty, and I do not know the total number of claims, 200 claims x $5 million per claim is one billion dollars. I checked it three times.

With 1,570 Mil shares outstanding, that is under a buck a share. I'd think settlement would make share price climb, not drop.
 
Posts: 8759 | Registered: March 24, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Supreme Court refuses to hear GM appeal on ignition deaths

© SIGforum 2024