quote:

Originally posted by comet24:
The hate that comes from people who say they are the tolerate ones.

Yeah, its pretty much a given that those who demand tolerance rarely give it.

Talk is cheap. Put your money, if you have any, snowflake idiot, where your mouth is. Bring it on.

Is there nothing any authorities can do about this?

As the Talmud puts it, “if someone comes to kill you, get up early in the morning to kill him first.”

I say it all the time, but liberalism is a mental disorder.

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
I say it all the time, but liberalism is a mental disorder.

That is not liberalism.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
I say it all the time, but liberalism is a mental disorder.

That is not liberalism.

Tell them that.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

That is not liberalism.

It is today. Take a liberal position, find someone you disagree with, and then target them with your insanity.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
I say it all the time, but liberalism is a mental disorder.

That is not liberalism.

Definitions change. You are no longer liberal, you are now Libertarian or Constitutionalist.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:
I say it all the time, but liberalism is a mental disorder.

That is not liberalism.

Tell them that.

You can't tell them anything. I expect more of the membership here. Is that expectation unrealistic? I'd like to think not.

These... creatures have been running under the cover of liberalism for too long. Now they're finally "jumping the shark" (many of them). What they truly are is becoming unmistakably clear--and "liberal" they most certainly are not.

Would you refer to the fascist regimes of the last century in Europe as "conservative," because they were "the opposite" of the Communists? Probably not. Likewise: These actors that style themselves "liberals" are by no means liberals, merely because they're anti-conservative/-capitalist.

You're preaching to the choir, brother. As skins said, definitions change. Rant all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that these leftists, secular progressives are by and large still referred to as "liberals."

quote:

Originally posted by comet24:
The hate that comes from people who say they are the tolerate ones.

Correct. And too many in society are ignorant-apathetic-complicit re that truth.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
You're preaching to the choir, brother. As skins said, definitions change. Rant all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that these leftists, secular progressives are by and large still referred to as "liberals."

This^ and they are out of their minds.

Sick fucks

A perfect example of why leftist hoplophobes want more bans, more restrictions. They know they are violent, and filled with hate, seeing their opponents, or just people who disagree with them, as full blown enemies. Targets. But they also see themselves as sane, and rational, and their behavior and attitudes as normal. So if they're this angry and violent without a weapon, imagine how a crazy, gun-toting, white lady sees the world!

We get it, they are crazy, doesn't matter what they identify as or what we call them.

The thing I want to know is what are we, the majority, supposed to do about it. I don't mean some equally crazy "civil" war or prepping BS.

Legally, what is this woman supposed to do or what do you tell your loved ones in similar positions? Would love to hear what the LEOs think.

Me, increase your situation awareness.

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:
Definitions change.

Don't look now, but classical liberals are rebelling and taking back the word "liberal" for liberals. Even some conservatives are recognizing they and liberals have more in common with one another than either does with today's radical leftists.

Notice an increasing number of news articles, commentary, blogs, social media posts, etc. are now referring to "leftists," as opposed to "liberals." The title of this thread is a case in point.

I would submit that continuing to use the word "liberal," when what is really meant is "leftist," is intellectual laziness. I would further argue that continuing to call leftists liberals simply helps them continue hiding what they really are.

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:
You are no longer liberal, you are now Libertarian or Constitutionalist.

If you believe that then you surely understand what neither of those are.

What's really funny about that comment is that, for many on the right: "Libertarian" is code for "something kind of more-or-less like 'liberal'," and "constitutionalist" is an odd kind of conservative. The latter is only superficially true and the former not even remotely accurate.

Neither is liberal, although libertarianism comes kinda sorta close. The "core" difference being liberals believe government has a role in society and libertarians not so much. (At the extreme end libertarianism closely resembles classical anarchy, which isn't even remotely similar to liberalism. Many believe all libertarians are closet anarchists.)

The people you see acting out are authoritarian leftists. (Which is really a redundant statement, but that redundancy is sometimes necessary to make the point, as some don't understand leftism is authoritarian by nature.) Some leftists know that's what they are, but seek to hide it under the mantle of liberalism. Others, like those in the restaurant, are so ignorant they don't know the difference. They've been told they're liberals, this is what liberals believe and how liberals behave, and accept it as fact. It never occurs to them their behaviour is the polar opposite of being "liberal" and is, in fact, authoritarian. (E.g.: It's hardly "liberal" to suppress alternate points-of-view, but it is certainly authoritarian.)

I have sometimes equated the behaviour of authoritarian leftists to a weird form of fascism. Even referring to them as "leftofascists." But that's not accurate, either. Fascism and authoritarian leftism are only alike in that they're both authoritarian, and that's about where the similarities end. So I'm going to stop doing that. Like calling authoritarian leftists "liberals": It's intellectually lazy.

A rose by any other name is still gonna prick you just as hard.

Those who wish to argue silliness in what the definition of "is" is, press on with your enlightened and erudite selves.


Me? I'm gonna keep my eye on the crazy ball, and my bat off my shoulder.

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:
A rose by any other name is still gonna prick you just as hard.

Those who wish to argue silliness in what the definition of "is" is, press on with your enlightened and erudite selves.


Me? I'm gonna keep my eye on the crazy ball, and my bat off my shoulder.

Exactly, thank you wise monkey!

quote:

Originally posted by ScreamingCockatoo:
I hope she gets a bodyguard now that beats the everlovingshit out of anyone who tries to hurt her.

The everlovingshit.

I think the young lady can protect herself against most comers. If the leftist coward had the intestinal fortitude she displays on the internet and had actually tried to assault her things would have gone poorly for the internet commando.