Do not, I repeat, do not order curly fries at Jack-in-the-Box in Houston.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA-7ehdZquw

https://www.fox26houston.com/n...ily-over-curly-fries

Why do I feel like if I just started popping caps off at everybody who happen to piss me off I wouldn’t get 2 years of PROBATION.

The world and its peoples be a crazy place. Sigh.

They fuck at the drive thru, okay!

quote:

Originally posted by Prefontaine:
They fuck at the drive thru, okay!

It’s 11:35pm where I am, so you just squeaked in but……you win the internet today.

Two years of probation would not even be appropriate for merely brandishing a firearm in such circumstances. It's totally insane for actually shooting at a man (and his family) who posed no physical threat to her whatsoever.

So much for 'satisfy the customer'.

I do partially agree with Democrats on gun control. Democrats should not be allowed to own guns.

quote:

Originally posted by FiveFiveSixFan:
Two years of probation would not even be appropriate for merely brandishing a firearm in such circumstances. It's totally insane for actually shooting at a man (and his family) who posed no physical threat to her whatsoever.

It's Harris County (aka the county that contains Houston), and of course they have a Soros funded woke DA (Kim Ogg). Sadly, if it hadn't been on the news the shitstain probably would've gotten less.

Other than the Astros, the only thing worth watching on the Houston news is when the President of HPD's union bad mouths Kim Ogg.

Damn..give the man some curly fries already! lol

At least he didn’t get fries that were spat upon.

His first mistake was going to Jack in the Box.

lawsuit here:

file:///C:/Users/15402/Documents/ramos-v-jack-in-the-boxpetition.pdf

2 short snips:

A reasonable person would not expect to use the drive thru of a restaurant and get
assaulted, cursed at, and shot with a weapon. A reasonable person would have expected to pull up
through the drive thru of a restaurant, order his/her food and leave.


Under Rule 47 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs disclose that
their prayer seeks monetary judgment relief over $250,000.00 but not more than
$1,000,000.00;

JACK IN THE BOX WORKER DEFENDS HERSELF AFTER BEING SUED, ACCUSED OF SHOOTING AT CUSTOMERS

“"A full investigation of the facts by us led the District Attorney's Office to realize the shortcomings in their case based on facts that have not been reported thus far," her criminal defense attorney, Daniel Werlinger, told ABC13.

Ford-Theriot got one year of deferred adjudication community supervision, which she completed in June 2023.“

What is “deferred adjudication community supervision”? Sounds double super serious.

"I'm not going to pull out no gun and shoot at somebody over no curly fries. Come on," Ford-Theriot said in response to the allegations.

———————-
Wow, then the CGI effects on the JITB video are amazing.

.

She said "if you hear the audio, you didn't hear the gun go off"

but the video shows the gun go off, and police found a shell casing

quote:

Originally posted by trapper189:
What is “deferred adjudication community supervision”?

Also sometimes called a "Withholding of Adjudication", this allows the person to serve a term of probation, and if successfully completed, the case is closed without a conviction.

Basically, they got the chance to stay out of trouble for a year and then the case would go away with no conviction on their record.

The Thugger got her just due but no reason to sue Jack-in-the-Box except for the usual entitlement money grab.

quote:

Originally posted by smschulz:

The Thugger got her just due but no reason to sue Jack-in-the-Box except for the usual entitlement money grab.

The plaintiff in the lawsuit is the customer who was shot at. Can't blame him for suing, he paid for curly fries and didn't get them.

Ghetto bitch needs to be sterilized. Immediately. Don't even get me started on the fact that she got probation.

quote:

Originally posted by smschulz:
The Thugger got her just due but no reason to sue Jack-in-the-Box except for the usual entitlement money grab.

Civil punishment for the actions of their employee is valid grounds for the lawsuit.