SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Are laws for protecting children stringent enough?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Are laws for protecting children stringent enough? Login/Join 
Member
Picture of FiveFiveSixFan
posted
The following would seem to indicate that they are not:

  • pouring rubbing alcohol on your disabled toddler and threatening to kill the child while streaming it live on Facebook is an aggravated misdemeanor
  • the child's mother stated in an interview that she committed the act for fun
  • despite the above, the alleged perpetrator was given a bond of only $2,000



Link


Iowa mom pours rubbing alcohol on disabled toddler, streams live on Facebook


A Davenport woman is accused of going live on Facebook on Thursday and pouring rubbing alcohol on her 2-year-old disabled child and threatening to kill the child, Davenport police said.

Darshanda Trenette McNeal, 29, is charged with one count of child endangerment.

The charge is an aggravated misdemeanor that carries a prison sentence of up to two years.

According to the arrest affidavit filed by Davenport Police Officer Jonathan Douglas, at 10:55 a.m. officers were sent to McNeal’s home regarding reports of a person pouring rubbing alcohol on her child and stating she was going to kill her child.

McNeal was streaming what she was doing live on Facebook with her cell phone, according to the arrest affidavit.

Officers were able to intervene and the child was taken to Genesis Medical Center for treatment, but did not sustain any injuries.

Iowa’s Department of Human Services was called in, police said.

During an interview with police after she was given her Miranda Rights, McNeal said at first she committed the act for an unknown reason but later stated during the interview she committed the act for fun, according to the affidavit.

McNeal was being held Thursday night in the Scott County Jail on $2,000 bond, cash or surety.
 
Posts: 7314 | Registered: January 10, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
Most states have sentencing penalties for various age groups. IE-Victim under 12 yoa.

But, I think that all true assaults should be punished. And the revolving door of justice needs to be padlocked. Not only do we not lock people up well enough, we give bond to anyone and everyone. Are you a registered sex offender that refuses to comply with the registry? Not a problem, we'll just keep giving you the same bond and letting you right back out.

People like to often quote how this or that person has "paid their debt to society" but it was pennies on the dollar. That isn't a payment for the crime they committed.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37117 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Poacher
posted Hide Post
No.
Murder, rape, crimes against children and the elderly should carry brutal sentences and zero bond.




NRA Life Member

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." Teddy Roosevelt
 
Posts: 2242 | Location: Newnan, GA USA | Registered: January 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Don't Panic
Picture of joel9507
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Poacher:
No.
Murder, rape, crimes against children and the elderly should carry brutal sentences and zero bond.

+1
And zero parole.
Indiana man accused of murdering, eating dead ex-girlfriend deemed competent for trial
quote:
Before his arrest in 2015, Oberhansley was free on parole for a previous killing when he was a teenager, according to WAVE3.
 
Posts: 15031 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: October 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of jbcummings
posted Hide Post
If it took more than an anonymous phone call to CPS saying “Mr Smith is abusing his little Sally”. No proof given, but now Mr Smith is presumed guilty until he can prove his innocence to a social worker who may go ahead with charges regardless. CPS offices have an uphill battle, I understand that, but I’ve also seen instances of “We can make you jump through hoops because we can and we don’t need proof” attitudes. Every allegation should be documented so that false accusations can be equally investigated.


———-
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for thou art crunchy and taste good with catsup.
 
Posts: 4306 | Location: DFW | Registered: May 21, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I would say that in this case Iowa's statute is not very well tailored to deal with this type of situation.

It is 726.6 at the following link if anyone cares to read it:

https://www.legis.iowa.gov/law...hapter=726&year=2018

Under their statute I'm not sure if they could have gotten it up to felony level unfortunately.
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: July 06, 2016Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Laws cannot protect children against those who would harm them. I'd like to see child abusers executed, but that would only stop repeat offenses.
 
Posts: 17145 | Location: Lexington, KY | Registered: October 15, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Conservative Behind
Enemy Lines
Picture of synthplayer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fredward:
I'd like to see child abusers executed, but that would only stop repeat offenses.


Works for me.



I found what you said riveting.
 
Posts: 10706 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: June 06, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of FiveFiveSixFan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fredward:
Laws cannot protect children against those who would harm them. I'd like to see child abusers executed, but that would only stop repeat offenses.


I agree that in cases involving crimes against persons which result in serious injury or death, laws cannot adequately protect those persons and are only effective in punishing the perpetrator. In this case, it seems that the toddler and the state both got second chances. The toddler since there were no lasting injuries and the state because the perpetrator left a trail of clues and evidence which should cause great concern for the toddler's safety in the future.

Rather than taking advantage of the fact that the perpetrator live-streamed her depraved actions and statements on Facebook and charging her appropriately, she was charged with a misdemeanor and given a ridiculously low bond. Then, in an interview with police, the perpetrator stated she did this for fun? Would this not be a golden opportunity to have her held without bond pending a court-ordered psych eval and to have a thorough investigation into her background and mental health status to determine whether or not she should be allowed custody of the child?
 
Posts: 7314 | Registered: January 10, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
“Bond” which is what is likely “bail” is to assure appearance at future proceedings and not as additional punishment, or a substitute therefor.

quote:
Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


While not exactly a right to bail, keeping accuseds in jail while presumed innocent ought to be avoided. Depending on the severity of the offenses, the defendant’s situation in the community, risk of flight, etc., reasonable bail ought to be allowed.

Once guilt is determined, that is another matter.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 71 TRUCK
posted Hide Post
Answer to the question being asked is no.
My question would be why was she not charged with attempted murder.




The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State



NRA Life Member
 
Posts: 2571 | Location: Central Florida, south of the mouse | Registered: March 08, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
My question goes back a generation - WHO was/were the irresponsible parents that raised this idiot to become a mother?

This is a classic result of sparing the rod. The grandchildren get abused through intention (in this case) or neglect.
 
Posts: 2132 | Location: south central Pennsylvania | Registered: November 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 30677 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Conservative Behind
Enemy Lines
Picture of synthplayer
posted Hide Post
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
That's the mother who abused her own child?!

I'm shocked, I tell you! Shocked!



I found what you said riveting.
 
Posts: 10706 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: June 06, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by synthplayer:
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
That's the mother who abused her own child?!

I'm shocked, I tell you! Shocked!
I have to say, this saddens me. It seems that there is a common theme when we see events like the one that we are talking about.

I do not know the proper terms to use, but it seems to me that this sort of behavior is common among the black culture. I am sure that it is a cultural thing, not a racial / genetic thing. Lack of family structure, lack of education, lack of development of moral values?

I am an Old Guy. Going on 82. I remember, maybe 50 years ago, family values were very strong in the black community. There was respect for older generations. There was love and support. I saw this in the people I knew. Values have changed, morality has all but disappeared. We like to blame it on Obama, but I saw it happening before Obama -- it might have accelerated under his "leadership," but it began before that.

What happened?



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 30677 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 229DAK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
What happened?

LBJ and the great society.


_________________________________________________________________________
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
 
Posts: 9042 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Constable
posted Hide Post
The first name speaks volumes.
 
Posts: 7074 | Location: Craig, MT | Registered: December 17, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of FiveFiveSixFan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
“Bond” which is what is likely “bail” is to assure appearance at future proceedings and not as additional punishment, or a substitute therefor.

quote:
Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


While not exactly a right to bail, keeping accuseds in jail while presumed innocent ought to be avoided. Depending on the severity of the offenses, the defendant’s situation in the community, risk of flight, etc., reasonable bail ought to be allowed.

Once guilt is determined, that is another matter.



I would argue that given the severity of the offense coupled with the stated desire to kill the toddler and having made a statement that she did it 'for fun', not only is $2,000 not excessive but it is instead woefully insufficient.
 
Posts: 7314 | Registered: January 10, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FiveFiveSixFan:
Darshanda Trenette McNeal,

Yep. Tells you all you need to know.


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 20107 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by synthplayer:
quote:
Originally posted by Fredward:
I'd like to see child abusers executed, but that would only stop repeat offenses.


Works for me.


Yep. On any day that ends in Y.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 43885 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Are laws for protecting children stringent enough?

© SIGforum 2024