Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Stangosaurus Rex |
Carsdotcom is dead to me for starters! As they dump Sean, I will dump them! I pulled this story randomly, funny comments for sure! I apologize for not posting the text, the article wont let me copy and paste. http://deadline.com/2017/05/ca...s-murder-1202101845/ ___________________________ "I Get It Now" Beth Greene | ||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
This was discussed somewhat in the Trump thread, page 285. https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...5/m/4520048714/p/285 "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
What's the justification for this? What exactly is Hannity doing that's so wrong? He's following a story. What's the problem? ____________________________________________________ "I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023 | |||
|
Stangosaurus Rex |
My bad, I did not look there for this although I did do a search with no results. I guess almost anything could be tied to Trump so I guess I should look their first. ___________________________ "I Get It Now" Beth Greene | |||
|
Stangosaurus Rex |
I don't know what the problem is, but cars dot com has a problem with him, so I have a problem with them. ___________________________ "I Get It Now" Beth Greene | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
He's the last of the original Foxes still there fighting the commies. They want to clean house. Q | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
I understand that. I'm asking about the rationale they're using. ____________________________________________________ "I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023 | |||
|
Delusions of Adequacy |
They're trying to shut down anyone who doesn't sing from the same choir book, and the current tactic is to pressure advertisers to decamp by threatening boycotts. Too bad the advertisers don't realize that these boycotts usually backfire. USAA is already taking fire from vets for pulling out. I have my own style of humor. I call it Snarkasm. | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
Yes, I understand this. I am asking about their stated rationale. ____________________________________________________ "I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023 | |||
|
Unflappable Enginerd |
Bolded __________________________________ NRA Benefactor I lost all my weapons in a boating, umm, accident. http://www.aufamily.com/forums/ | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
Haven't really seen anything "stated" as such, but it certainly confirms the stories that the leftist are going to attack all conservative news sources using Saul Alinskis methods, if you can't beat the enemy in battle, then attack their monetary support system. It doesn't matter how you achieve a goal, just that you do. We need to contact the advertisers and let them know that conservative still support them, but if they pull out, we'll drop purchasing their services and goods, The end result is, zero advertising with anyone on either side as corporations look to remain profitable and not in the fray, it's simply a scare tactic to divert money away from the conservative market... I'd boycot their stuff but I don't buy skinny jeans, lattes, birkenstocks and trendy IPA beer. The responses are starting up at cars.com's facebook page, post there that they are losing your business and future business, and will let any of your dealer friends know that they won't be getting leads from any conservatives purchasing cars through cars. com. https://www.facebook.com/CarsDotCom/ btw most of my industry insider friends report that dealers hate cars.com as they take every email address of someone registered and compare it to dealer sales lists, if you email is there and they match cars.com bills the dealer, even if the lead wasn't generated by cars.com or the reason for purchase. | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
What I'm trying to get across here is that it makes no sense for advertisers to start abandoning the guy unless the people who vow these boycotts say something like the following: "Sean Hannity persists in his airing of the Seth Rich murder story, and we feel this is wrong because of _________________, therefore and for this reason, we are going to boycott your company." Fill in the blank, please. What is the stated rationale? I understand what they're trying to do and I understand the specific reasons they are trying to do it. I am asking for their stated reasons for this crap, and lacking any such reasons, it makes no sense for advertisers to bail. Or are these companies just waking up to this decade in America? Brand new world for them, is it? They weren't aware until last week that for months, half of this country has been throwing a nonstop tantrum over our lawfully elected POTUS? ____________________________________________________ "I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023 | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
You have to wonder, my guess is they are getting hammered on social media and in the email of people saying they are not going to use their product that they feel are in their market zone. For a company to react like this is strange, either there are a bazillion people hitting them with negative messages, or, the core belief of the executives at Cars.com are super left, doesn't make sense though if they were super left they wouldn't have marketed on Hannity to begin with based on principle.. As it stands they just alienated 50% of their market anyway... | |||
|
always with a hat or sunscreen |
Just posted this to the USAA Community Forum: Certifiable member of the gun toting, septuagenarian, bucket list workin', crazed retiree, bald is beautiful club! USN (RET), COTEP #192 | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
It's the same people (likely Soros funded) that bombarded O'Reilly's advertisers and ultimately caused Fox to can him. It's coordinated and obvious. All these advertisers know is that they are getting thousands of callers, emailers, what have you a day saying that they will boycott their products if they don't immediately stop advertising during Hannity's show. They don't know or care why there's a boycott. They only care about numbers (even if they're likely bogus) that show that they might lose money. They're cowards and they're dumb and they're simply pandering to the synchronized, leftist masses. ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
Member |
I could be way off here but I believe it has to do with his talking about the Seth Rich possible connection to the DNC election time leaks that are being blamed on the Russians. It appears that the GDC's are hell bent on keeping the focus on the Trump Campaign/Russia collusion BS and are trying to spin in that Hannity is just spreading rumors and disrespecting the deceased or something to the effect, are are contacting companies to pull advertising from his show in an attempt to get Fox to get rid of him or for him to at least shit up about it. That's what I've taken away from it anyway. ___________________________ Not giving a damn since...whenever... | |||
|
Essayons |
Excellent response, Bald1! It inspired me to cancel my coverage with USAA and send the following message:
Thanks, Sap | |||
|
Member |
Hannity suggests it's just more political hash slinging by libs. He predicted he'd get focused on when Bill O'Reilly was fired. Boom, his turn now, here it comes. From Chicago Tribune:
| |||
|
Member |
It's about nothing more than revenue. The advertisers couldn't care less what Hannity does as long as it doesn't alienate a significant population or enrage some force to be reckoned with that could affect them at the check-out isle. Advertisers aren't looking for a moral or partisan fight. The advertisers will go where viewership goes. Their corporate decisions aren't generally based on partisanship. Generally. And for no other reason. If they had come to show support for Hannity with their ad dollars ... they'd still be there. But that isn't what it's about in corporate America ... generally. That's the way I figure it but am open to speculation about specific advertisers and or their 3rd party manipulators. | |||
|
Still finding my way |
Hate speech. The posts on social media are claiming that Hannity is guilty of hate speech, islomophobia, lgbt123-phobia, and the usual vague and baseless accusations. There were no actual grievances listed anywhere I have looked. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |