Here is an excellent article by Victor Davis Hanson, too lengthy to post.

Excellent read Thanks. Seems like a real story here if any of the media wanted to pursue it.

Lengthy, but the first good, organized telling of the story of what happened that I've read yet. Thanks.

Here is another helpful essay on the intelligence debacle, this one by Andrew McCarthy.

Thanks for sharing. Read both articles and other info attached. Real eye opener.

McCarthy is too critical of Nunes.

It has been abundantly clear that DEMs are out to bring down Donald Trump, and they don't care if their claims are true or false. Look at the history of Elijah Cummings in trying to stop/hinder/slow down/derail other congressional investigations.

Schiff is just as bad.

Nunes should share as little as possible w DEMs.

This is a remarkable situation. We have operatives in the intelligence community trying to negatively influence a presidential election.

The real story isn't the Russians hacking an election, but that our own intel agencies have become political weapons of the far left.

The DEMs have admitted Podesta got phished by stupidly responding to an email that told him to change his password.

The DNC ignored for months warnings from the FBI that they had been hacked.

The FBI has never presented evidence that the Russians actually did the hacking.

The FBI reportedly did not examine the DNC computers because the DNC did not allow them to do that. The Russian hacking evidence appears to be based on a private company's assessment. A company owned by Google. And Google's top leader wrote the game plan for Hillary Clinton's campaign.


Recently wikileaks revealed that the CIA hacks and then leaves fabricated evidence that the hack was by the Russians.

Once the word got out about Nunes "discovery", Fox has reported the source for Nunes got blowback from that leaking agency.

Fox report said "after Nunes had been approached by his source, the agencies basically would not allow him in at all"

I think that means the agencies would not cooperate and provide Nunes w more info


Any info given to the DEMs will flow right back to the intel operatives that Nunes is trying to defeat.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: sdy,

Schiff needs to get torpedoed and soon.

Yup, if this ever gets the traction W-gate got, it will make W-gate look like a bad Sat Night Live skit.

Good to see you up and around, Jim/w5.

The pattern seems to that anyone investigating GDC misdeeds must be recused, removed or destroyed, by any means necessary.

Media accounts aren't focusing on what Nunes was shown, but who did it, when, how, what were they wearing, who signed them in.

To a certain extent, this is understandable. The material is classified, can't be reported publicly, unless someone mails it to the NYT, but there are deadlines, cameras rolling, pages to fill, editors to placate. But nobody gets a Pulitzer for reporting on the dog show or the new Chic-Fil-A opening.

Cold hard truth:

If Clinton​ <shudder> had won and the RNC had been hacked this Russian connection would have been buried. If not, they would have claimed the Republican's​ were incompetent, allowed it, losing the election was their fault, and in doing so demonstrated that they clearly had no businesses in the White House.

quote:

Nunes should share as little as possible w DEMs.

I know exactly what you're saying, but if it isn't a public process it's too easily dismissed as a partisan attack.