Holy cats. At first glance, I thought the odds were pretty much against SIG. Turns out it was a one-punch fight over drafting a challenging sequence of claims about the equivalent of a permanenent structural support (ie., one freakin' cross pin). Damn. Good for SIG, but it's a day for surprises.
Posts: 27306 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008
Originally posted by Il Cattivo: Holy cats. At first glance, I thought the odds were pretty much against SIG. Turns out it was a one-punch fight over drafting a challenging sequence of claims about the equivalent of a permanenent structural support (ie., one freakin' cross pin). Damn. Good for SIG, but it's a day for surprises.
Interesting read for sure. Its almost like Sig Had their lawyers do some work before coming up with their concept in the p250 to make sure they wouldn't run afoul...
This reminds me of when Microtech tried to sue Kershaw ZT.
