Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York is one of the most talked-about potential Democratic candidates for the White House in 2020. But she has also turned into a thorn in the side of the Department of Justice as she holds up one of DOJ's highest-profile postings.

The junior senator from New York plans to use her “blue-slip prerogative” to block the confirmation of Geoffrey S. Berman, if he is nominated by President Trump to be the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, Gillibrand spokesman Glen Caplin told Fox News.

Berman, 58, a former prosecutor in the office, has been appointed by Attorney General Jeff Sessions as the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. The posting has jurisdiction over all businesses in Manhattan, including those of Trump and his family.

Gillibrand doesn't have an issue with Berman’s qualifications. Her objection lies with the man who nominated him and reports that Berman personally met with the president as part of the selection process.

“This is about President Trump,” Caplin said. "Senator Gillibrand believes U.S. attorneys work for the people they serve and must be independent from the White House.”

He called it a “cornerstone of our democracy” and said reports that Trump took the “unusual step of personally interviewing Berman are deeply disturbing, considering the conflicts of interest inherent by his potential jurisdiction on matters that could affect the president personally."

Caplin said that if the meeting between Trump and Berman occurred, as purported, it should be disqualifying.

“Under these circumstances, if nominated, the senator would have no choice but to stand up for the independence of the U.S. attorney's office by using her blue-slip prerogative,” Caplin said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has long adhered to a so-called blue-slip process, in which "home-state" senators can attempt to block a president's preferred choice for federal office in their state.

Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has made it clear that he intends to honor the “blue-slip courtesy.”

"It is difficult to envision a scenario in which Chairman Grassley would disregard an unreturned or negative blue slip on a U.S. attorney nominee,” Grassley spokesman Taylor Foy said.

The blue-slip courtesy was created in 1917 by the committee chairman at that time, Charles Culberson, D-Texas. It gives home-state senators the ability to consult with the White House when it comes to the nomination of circuit and district court judges, U.S. attorneys and federal marshals.

A source close to the committee told Fox News: "This hasn't really been much of a thing recently. Home-state senators usually negotiate with the White House. I don't recall encountering a blue-slip dispute for U.S. attorney nominees in the past."

Fox News has learned that Justice officials have offered Gillibrand a chance to meet with Berman.

“It’s very disappointing to hear the senator’s remarks,” one Justice Department official told Fox News. “We certainly hope that she will reconsider the offer we made to the senator in September to set up an in-person meeting with Mr. Berman where she could raise any concerns she may have.”

When asked about the offer to meet with Berman, a source close to Gillibrand would not comment on whether she’d be open to it in the future but reiterated, “Regarding meeting with Berman, this is about President Trump, not Mr. Berman personally."

Justice officials also tell Fox News that Gillibrand rejected an offer to meet with FBI Director Christopher Wray before his Senate confirmation. Gillibrand later voted against Wray's confirmation. So far, she’s also rejected the invitation to meet with three other newly appointed U.S. attorneys in New York.

Unlike Gillibrand, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer has already met with all four newly appointed U.S. attorneys in the Empire State.

One Trump administration official told Fox News, "This isn't about principle, this is about 2020."

Gillibrand is widely believed to be a top Democratic contender for a possible 2020 run for the presidency. While neither Gillibrand nor her aides would confirm or deny plans for a White House bid, there are reports of extensive fundraising as well as her outreach to young people and communities of color that play well with one of the most serious anti-Trump voting records in the Senate.

Trump officials have been quick to call out Gillibrand as hypocritical and point to a meeting former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara had with Trump.

“It’s notable that Senator Gillibrand did not put out a statement condemning Preet Bharara when he met with President Trump shortly after the election about staying on as United States attorney," said one administration official.

In fact, Senator Schumer had a positive response to that meeting.

“President-elect Trump called me last week and asked me what I thought about Preet Bharara continuing his role as U.S. attorney. I told him I thought Preet was great, and I would be all for keeping him on the job and fully support it,” Schumer told the New York Post.

Caplin referred to the Bharaha meeting as "a red herring.”

He said: “Mr. Bharara met with President-elect Trump before he was president and the president displayed an inability to keep an appropriate arms-length relationship with law enforcement. In fact, Mr. Bharara was fired less than 24 hours after following protocol and declining to return the sitting president’s phone call. Mr. Bharara’s statement that he believed President Trump would ultimately ask him ‘to do something inappropriate’ is further cause for real concern."

The question for many becomes whether a sitting president, or a president-elect, should be meeting with a prospective U.S. attorney. The opinions differ.

Gillibrand thinks such a meeting is unethical.

William Barr, the attorney general from 1991-93 under George H. W. Bush, told Fox News, "It is not surprising at all that a president would take a moment to meet a candidate for a major DOJ post, including key U.S. attorney positions, before nominating."

Barr went on to say: "This is no cause for concern. Based on my own experience in Bush 41's administration, this is not unusual and makes sense where the president is not personally familiar with the candidate. Unless something inappropriate was discussed, the nominee should be judged on his or her merits and qualifications."

Department of Justice officials point out that Trump also met Jessie Liu, the new U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., who was confirmed by the Senate in September.

Trump also has business dealings in Washington, specifically the Trump International Hotel downtown. D.C., however, has no home-state senators to block the president's appointments.

Link

I’m not sure about “The posting has jurisdiction over all businesses in Manhattan, including those of Trump and his family.“

The US Attorney in the Southern District is responsible for prosecutions in that district, businesses, mobs, politicians, illegal immigrants, all sorts of federal crimes, including politicians and stock swindling. The implication is inaccurate.

The, (another) Jr. Senator just picked up where DP Moynihan left off. Groomed like a dog by none other than hillary clinton and schumer. She is a farce. She is not qualified. The people in the upstate cant stand her. They're just trying to be a thorn in the side of President Trump.

She's a whore.

I say that because she was one way (or pretended to be to keep her constituants happy), only to change her views when upChuck called upon her to be his puppet and take Hilary's seat. Her beliefs are for sale. And she sold them. She's a whore.

quote:

Originally posted by David Lee:
The, (another) Jr. Senator just picked up where DP Moynihan left off. Groomed like a dog by none other than hillary clinton and schumer. She is a farce. She is not qualified. The people in the upstate cant stand her. They're just trying to be a thorn in the side of President Trump.

Yeah, she doesn't have a chance in hell.

She, like most (if not all) of them, is a liar. She'd claim to be somewhat conservative in order to get the votes (although in/around Albany she really didn't need that) but consistently was out in left field when in the House.

The NY "conservatives" weren't unhappy with her selection to replace Mrs. Clinton, thinking that she was, again, somewhat conservative, and she bullshitted them again.

She's a piece of trash, not unlike her mentor Chuck.

quote:

Originally posted by cas:
She's a whore.

I say that because she was one way (or pretended to be to keep her constituants happy), only to change her views when upChuck called upon her to be his puppet and take Hilary's seat. Her beliefs are for sale. And she sold them. She's a whore.

She's Actually a TWUNT, Not a Whore...

The best comment on this topic I read a week or so back, source not recallable. It offered that the subject female 'has the gravitas of a fruit fly' .

quote:

Originally posted by downtownv:

quote:

Originally posted by cas:
She's a whore.

I say that because she was one way (or pretended to be to keep her constituants happy), only to change her views when upChuck called upon her to be his puppet and take Hilary's seat. Her beliefs are for sale. And she sold them. She's a whore.

She's Actually a TWUNT, Not a Whore...

I replied to this and something I said caught it in the mod queue. Suffice it to say, I agree with cas. Her allegiances are for sale, and that's the bigger factor than any other terms that may apply.

I thought they did away with that "blue slip" crap!

Oh yeah. I can just see the black community nationwide rolling out to support this person.



As I've noted before, I truly hope this woman is good in bed because she's simply too stupid to be good at anything else. If this is the best the Dem's can come up with, they're screwed.

So if the fact that a meeting was held between two people one person should be disqualified (Caplin said that if the meeting between Trump and Berman occurred, as purported, it should be disqualifying.)

Where was this woman and her passion for disqualifying someone based strictly on the fact of a meeting after Lynch and WJC met in Arizona???????

Another democratic hypocrite.........

quote:

Originally posted by heathtx:
So if the fact that a meeting was held between two people one person should be disqualified (Caplin said that if the meeting between Trump and Berman occurred, as purported, it should be disqualifying.)

Where was this woman and her passion for disqualifying someone based strictly on the fact of a meeting after Lynch and WJC met in Arizona???????

Another democratic hypocrite.........

It’s resistance. Anything to obstruct, impede, prevent.

Sen. Grassley has blue slip is a courtesy that need not be observed if abused.

If this nominee is otherwise qualified, she may find that Senatorial courtesy goes only so far.