I called this number three times and was finally able to leave a message. It also offered up an email address which I wasn't quite able to write down. If someone on here can copy and post the address, I'll also send them an email. I could not find it on their website. Www.Supreme Court.gov Maybe you can. 202-479-3000 Let them know you are not happy.

What aren't you happy about?

The problem I see with your proposal is that how federal government works is that the judicial branch is supposed to be immune from any pressure to rule one way or another. If politicians who are supposed to be sensitive to the electorate can ignore small people who don't have the dollars to make their voice heard, how much less inclined would the supreme court be?

quote:

Originally posted by Rey HRH:
What aren't you happy about?

The problem I see with your proposal is that how federal government works is that the judicial branch is supposed to be immune from any pressure to rule one way or another. If politicians who are supposed to be sensitive to the electorate can ignore small people who don't have the dollars to make their voice heard, how much less inclined would the supreme court be?

The so called election. I'm looking for the court to get involved. If you are ok with stuff getting stolen from you, then I'll be right over for a visit. I'd like to see our so called party get off their ass, make noise, do anything they can to stop this madness. I'd like to see our side get so pissed they make ANTIFA look like school children. Shall I go on?

quote:

Originally posted by coloradohunter44:

quote:

Originally posted by Rey HRH:
What aren't you happy about?

The problem I see with your proposal is that how federal government works is that the judicial branch is supposed to be immune from any pressure to rule one way or another. If politicians who are supposed to be sensitive to the electorate can ignore small people who don't have the dollars to make their voice heard, how much less inclined would the supreme court be?

The so called election. I'm looking for the court to get involved. If you are ok with stuff getting stolen from you, then I'll be right over for a visit. I'd like to see our so called party get off their ass, make noise, do anything they can to stop this madness. I'd like to see our side get so pissed they make ANTIFA look like school children. Shall I go on?

Whatever message you left or letter you write won’t make it far past the receptionist. They don’t work like Congress - keeping track of popular opinion.

-Rob
(Member of the Supreme Court Bar)

I have yet to understand, exactly what would be presented to the court.

Assuming the SC accepts the case, the OP could petition the court to submit an amicus curiae. If approved he could submit a brief with the intention of influencing the court's decision.

Sending an email that's he's unhappy, however, would be like expressing his unhappiness with the sun rising in the east.

quote:

Originally posted by RogB:
Assuming the SC accepts the case, the OP could petition the court to submit an amicus curiae. If approved he could submit a brief with the intention of influencing the court's decision.

Sending an email that's he's unhappy, however, would be like expressing his unhappiness with the sun rising in the east.

Yes. I requested that they accept the case and make 70 million people whole in light of the fraud, which has been proven if you have watched any testimony in the Michigan inquiry.

Study how SCOTUS works. They aren't a "public" entity and are mandated to do nothing but evaluate evidence and arguments in the scope of the Constitution. To be blunt, your feelings mean nothing to the Court, nor should they.

Any "case" has a long road to travel through sundry appellate courts before it gets to the SCOTUS, and they are under no obligation to hear every case that comes before them.

quote:

Originally posted by coloradohunter44:

quote:

Originally posted by Rey HRH:
What aren't you happy about?

The problem I see with your proposal is that how federal government works is that the judicial branch is supposed to be immune from any pressure to rule one way or another. If politicians who are supposed to be sensitive to the electorate can ignore small people who don't have the dollars to make their voice heard, how much less inclined would the supreme court be?

The so called election. I'm looking for the court to get involved. If you are ok with stuff getting stolen from you, then I'll be right over for a visit. I'd like to see our so called party get off their ass, make noise, do anything they can to stop this madness. I'd like to see our side get so pissed they make ANTIFA look like school children. Shall I go on?

I guess I'm safe from a visit from you since I'm not okay with the blatant stealing of the election with the complicit support of the press. Apparently, even the Republican governor and attorney general in Georgia is somehow okay with what happened even starting in March with them agreeing to changes proposed by the DNC. I'm thinking Stacey Abrams loss was even a ploy to set up the Republican governor to provide cover.

But as others have said, that's not how the Supreme Court works.

Trump had blacks in Chicago being vocal in their support for him. Trump had LGBTQ people in San Francisco being vocal in their support for him. Trump had people living in liberal Beverly Hills, a stone's throw away from Hollywood being vocal in their support for him. The people who voted for Trump in 2016 saw that Trump was true to his word and delivered what he campaigned on. Trump's campaigns drew huge crowds of supporters. Biden hardly got people to attend the few rallies he held.

Trump had 10 million more votes than in 2016. He increased his support among black voters and I believe the highest any Republican in modern history has received.

Yes, Biden had more votes than Trump but interestingly enough, Biden underperformed Obama and Hillary in liberal places EXCEPT for the liberal places in the swing states. No one in the press is wondering about the huge numbers that Biden received in the context of the huge numbers that Trump received.

The DC swamp doesn't like Trump as apparently they didn't make much money during Trump's term as laws that didn't make anyone money such as the criminal reform act were Trump's focus. Trump was cutting in on everyone's bread and butter.

After the election, something sure smelled fishy to me and I figure a shit show was going to happen. I went to cash on all my IRA accounts and had my money manager flipped me from 70% stocks / 30% bonds to 30% stocks / 70% bonds. In the meanwhile, the market has gone up 11% and I'm thinking that's to get people's minds off the election and for them to buy Biden's "election."

I'm still hoping Sydney Powell comes through with her promise of biblical proportions and kraken on steriods.

If nothing else, Trump has clearly demonstrated that the US has fallen to the level of any third rate banana republic if this election stands as call. But I'll comfort myself that Trump did show that America can be great with everything he's done including appointing three constitutionalist judges.

Senator Stennis used to pull out a tattered piece of paper from his suit. It was a handwritten note in pencil from one of his consitutients. It was very effective with winning the votes of rural Mississippians. Who knows he may have written it himself. Paying attention to the little people garners votes as Huey Long also knew.