SIGforum
DAK question RE P239 and P220

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/150601935/m/2740013324

April 26, 2017, 01:22 AM
robotoid
DAK question RE P239 and P220
Anyone know if the P239 and P220 frames are all DAK compatible, or if they have to have the extra little bit machined out of the frame like the P226/229? i.e.-would a 2000 vintage P239 be DAK parts compatible?
April 26, 2017, 09:29 AM
GaryBF
quote:
i.e.-would a 2000 vintage P239 be DAK parts compatible?

No way. The DAK trigger wasn't even introduced until 2004, or thereabout, and SIGs had dedicated frames for several years after that.
June 09, 2017, 02:37 PM
sigfreund
quote:
Originally posted by GaryBF:
quote:
i.e.-would a 2000 vintage P239 be DAK parts compatible?

No way. The DAK trigger wasn't even introduced until 2004, or thereabout, and SIGs had dedicated frames for several years after that.




► 6.4/93.6

“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.”
— Plato
June 29, 2017, 09:38 PM
NYresq
I can only speak for the 239 as I have never seen a new frame 220, but on the 239 there is a noticeable difference on the frame cutout on the right side below the frame rails where the trigger bar goes behind the hammer. All new 239's are cut this way, even if they come with a DA/SA trigger.


_______________________________



Sig, Colt M-16/M-4/1911 and Glock Armorer.
I love my P229, but if I had to go to a war, I would take my Glock...