|Step by step walk the thousand mile road|
Maybe the ACLU will suddenly realize that challenging government overreach in the firearms world can be profitable.
Nice is overrated
"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
Late to the party, but I don't think this suit will mean very much because cities like Cranston have annual budgets in excess of $311M.
A 250K suit is 0.08% of the city's annual budget and it took six years to litigate. Just over 0.013% of the budget, so from a risk management perspective, it's a very worthwhile expense to see if you could get courts to agree with city's arguments on extreme risk and prevention of domestic violence.
(Not saying it's right, just explaining the position the city might take and why these actions might not be deterred by this suit.)
Check out my big WTS: https://sigforum.com/eve/forum...0601935/m/2340052694
So, of the $250k settlement, he gets $31k. Doesn't say if he got the guns back either
Besides the $250K settlement, how much did the city also have to shell out (taxpayer $$) to litigate this losing court case?
NRA Life Member, Rifle & Pistol Instructor and Range Safety Officer
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
|Powered by Social Strata|