Muzzle flash aficionado

| Isn't there a cutoff time after which updates to threads aren't possible? flashguy
Texan by choice, not accident of birth |
| |
Member

| quote: Originally posted by flashguy: Isn't there a cutoff time after which updates to threads aren't possible?
flashguy
I believe, as long as a thread isn't locked, you can edit indefinitely, on here. Some other forums I'm on, it's something like a 15 minute window to edit.
The Enemy's gate is down. |
| Posts: 9106 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011 |  
IP
|
|
Frangas non Flectes
| That thread is over ten years old. Do I understand you correctly that you’re suggesting that people go through years of their old posts to update broken image links with newly hosted pictures? I can’t speak for everyone, but I surely don’t have time for that. What you’re complaining about is simply the reality of the internet since it began, and what you’re asking is unrealistic, at best.
______________________________________________ "It's good for you, because it's got chia seeds and mayonnaise!"
|
| Posts: 12621 | Location: Seattle-ish | Registered: February 10, 2011 |  
IP
|
|
Member

| quote: Originally posted by P220 Smudge: That thread is over ten years old. Do I understand you correctly that you’re suggesting that people go through years of their old posts to update broken image links with newly hosted pictures? I can’t speak for everyone, but I surely don’t have time for that.
What you’re complaining about is simply the reality of the internet since it began, and what you’re asking is unrealistic, at best.
Well I am not actually "complaining" not sure where you came up with that? I am referring to the tacked threads to update photos. It's really not that hard, I did it in a few minutes. What is the point of a tacked thread with all the info missing? Yes that thread is old, but if now useless then it needs removed. |
| Posts: 76 | Location: Illinois | Registered: December 03, 2002 |  
IP
|
|