SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    caliber debate 6.5 Swede or 8mm Mauser
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
caliber debate 6.5 Swede or 8mm Mauser Login/Join 
Telecom Ronin
Picture of dewhorse
posted
Ok, so the local cabelas has a very nice Ruger African in 6.5 Swede in their gun library and a surplus(?) bubba'ed Mauser in 8MM.

This question is not about the rifles as each has points in their favor.

Between 8mm and 6.5x55 which would you choose and why?
 
Posts: 8301 | Location: Back in NE TX ....to stay | Registered: February 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
6.5x55, new bullet selections.
 
Posts: 9947 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Buy high and sell "low"
Picture of archerman
posted Hide Post
6.5x55 is my favorite cartridge for deer and most other large game, and the Ruger African rifle is a thing of beauty, no contest get the 6.5x55 African!


Archerman
 
Posts: 2476 | Location: N. Idaho | Registered: February 26, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Made from a
different mold
Picture of mutedblade
posted Hide Post
The 6.5x55 is my greatest discovery. Very little recoil and devastating performance on deer. For the last 5 years, it’s all I’ve used for hunting. Absolutely perfect for North American game. Bullet selection is very good too


___________________________
No thanks, I've already got a penguin.
 
Posts: 2824 | Location: Lake Anna, VA | Registered: May 07, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
No contest...

6.5 Swede is still widely used by hunters today, and is a fantastic round.

Whereas 8mm Mauser is nearly kaput.
 
Posts: 32428 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
To all of you who are serving or have served our country, Thank You
Picture of Jelly
posted Hide Post
My experience is i had a 8mm Mauser 98 for a about 3 years as a Deer rifle in my younger days. I hated just about everything about it and do not miss it at all. I own 3 rifles in 6.5 Swede they are wonderful Deer rifles.
 
Posts: 2675 | Registered: March 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
6.5x55 All day long.

I have always assumed that 8mm only really caught on because while “small” caliber (compared to the previous prevalence of 10-12mm black powder calibers, it still wasn’t “too small” for the decision makers of the late 19th century.

Just in the case of Mauser’s cartridges, look at what else they had available around the 1900s: 7X57mm, an amazing cartridge.
Maybe even more impressive, how about 7.65x53mm? They practically invented 7.62 NATO in 1889!
I would argue that either of those rounds (especially 7.65X53 with the ability to fit into. A shorter action) are better than 7.92X57.

But anyway... sorry for the drift. I love my 6.5 Swedes! Awesome round any way you look at it!

Bill R
 
Posts: 1117 | Location: Wet side of WA | Registered: October 24, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of sourdough44
posted Hide Post
We have two rifles in 6.5 Swede, one older milsurp then a modern CZ. The Swede(with modern loading) was the Creedmoor before the creed was developed.

I’ll jump on the Swede bandwagon.
 
Posts: 6131 | Location: WI | Registered: February 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Telecom Ronin
Picture of dewhorse
posted Hide Post
Wow....I figured the Swede would win but it's 100% so far.

the Mauser is really cheap, maybe I will grab it for a future build. Not totally sure it's a bubba rifle since the barrel is 22" with proper non-military sights. 9.3x62 is an easy conversion on the 8mm.

The Ruger is pretty....I love the bluing and the wood.....

And 6.5x55 ammo is plentiful
 
Posts: 8301 | Location: Back in NE TX ....to stay | Registered: February 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Hop head
Picture of lyman
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dewhorse:
Wow....I figured the Swede would win but it's 100% so far.

the Mauser is really cheap, maybe I will grab it for a future build. Not totally sure it's a bubba rifle since the barrel is 22" with proper non-military sights. 9.3x62 is an easy conversion on the 8mm.

The Ruger is pretty....I love the bluing and the wood.....

And 6.5x55 ammo is plentiful



sounds like the correct answer is both



https://www.chesterfieldarmament.com/

 
Posts: 10410 | Location: Beach VA,not VA Beach | Registered: July 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dewhorse:
Not totally sure it's a bubba rifle since the barrel is 22" with proper non-military sights.


Got a photo, or a link? What are the markings on the receiver?

There were a number of different factory commercial sporting Mausers in 8mm produced during the interwar period, and again after WW2. So it could be vintage but factory, and not a "Bubba" job of a military Mauser.



 
Posts: 32428 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If you have an affinity for stout recoil, get the 8mm. Otherwise, get the Swede.
 
Posts: 668 | Location: NH | Registered: December 28, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Telecom Ronin
Picture of dewhorse
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
quote:
Originally posted by dewhorse:
Not totally sure it's a bubba rifle since the barrel is 22" with proper non-military sights.


Got a photo, or a link? What are the markings on the receiver?

There were a number of different factory commercial sporting Mausers in 8mm produced during the interwar period, and again after WW2. So it could be vintage but factory, and not a "Bubba" job of a military Mauser.





I will see if I an grab one....they're not German but M48s....they had several of them and are down to 2.

If they looked like any of the above ones there would have been no debate, I love commercial Mausers
 
Posts: 8301 | Location: Back in NE TX ....to stay | Registered: February 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Slacker
posted Hide Post
They are for different hunts. I suspect you already know that, as well as which one really suits what you typically shoot.

For the 8x57mm, I can attest to my hunting partner putting literal tons of meat in the freezer with one over the years. Often he didn't know which of two (or more) different loads he shot the critter with. Just had a random handful he went into the woods with.
 
Posts: 7486 | Registered: May 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of kimberkid
posted Hide Post
I've never shot the 6.5 Swede, but I have shot the 8mm Mauser ... and I developed a great deal of respect for those fellows that had to shoot those in battle. They are brutal. Infact I don't remember the last time I shot a full power 8mm load, but I do remember the last time I shot it, was 20 rounds and the next several days I could barely move my arm. Keep in mind this was with a Surplus K98, steel butt plate and all.
I had 2 cases of 1280(?) rounds ... I pulled the bullets and they typically had over 55 grains of powder, I reloaded them down to someplace between 38 and 40 grains, I've still got 1 case and 1 rifle left, figured someone may need it for the next revolution, but it won't be me.


If you really want something you'll find a way ...
... if you don't you'll find an excuse.

I'm really not a "kid" anymore ... but I haven't grown up yet either Wink
 
Posts: 5700 | Registered: January 11, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The point about the old 8mm Mauser having some kick is a good one. Same goes for the 1903, Mosin-Nagant, ...

When we think of WW1 or WW2 soldiers carrying and shooting these things, remember that WW1 or WW2 soldier probably weighed about 150 pounds.

We are bigger now but they probably were tougher on average.

Also, I don't think the philosophy when the rifles were developed was that an individual soldier was going to put down a large volume of fire. The volume of fire was going to come from that soldiers and hundreds to thousands of his friends firing in volleys. That was the expectation any way.

The experiences of WW2 and to a lesser extent WW1 changed military thinking. Army's moved to intermediate power cartridges.
 
Posts: 462 | Location: Illinois | Registered: June 13, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigless in
Indiana
Picture of IndianaBoy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sw4566:
If you have an affinity for stout recoil, get the 8mm. Otherwise, get the Swede.



I had a bandolier of Turkish 8mm back in the early 2000s. Holy crap......
 
Posts: 14114 | Location: Indiana | Registered: December 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jimmo952:
When we think of WW1 or WW2 soldiers carrying and shooting these things ....


That’s an interesting point that relates to something LTC Dave Grossman discussed in his book On Combat (could have been in On Killing, but I believe it was the former). He went on at length about studies that supposedly determined the percentages of US soldiers who fired their rifles in combat in World War II and Vietnam.

According to his information, a far higher percentage of soldiers fired their rifles in Vietnam than in WWII. His rather shaky (IMO) conclusion was that the difference was because marksmanship training for soldiers in the big war was on traditional bull’s-eye type targets whereas later more realistic silhouette targets were the norm. He believed that soldiers in the Vietnam era had been conditioned to overcome their reluctance to shoot human beings by their exposure to those green bottle shapes.

That conclusion has always seemed highly spurious to me, but I have wondered that if his information about percentages of shooters in the two wars was correct, what the actual reason was. I would be willing to bet that different common combat conditions might have had something to do with the varying percentages, but now that you mention the recoil issue, I wonder if that could have affected some soldiers’ willingness to shoot their rifles when it wasn’t an immediate matter of life or death.

Thanks for that thought.
(I’m not, BTW, necessarily wedded to that idea, but books I’ve been reading recently have mentioned how rushed training got for US soldiers during WWII. It was to the point that reportedly some were sent to the European theater without having even fired their rifles before they got there.)




6.4/93.6

“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.”
— Plato
 
Posts: 47365 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of kimberkid
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by IndianaBoy:
<snip>
I had a bandolier of Turkish 8mm back in the early 2000s. Holy crap......

Sounds like what I’ve still got a case of, cloth bandolier with 8-10 pockets closed with a small steel button, each pocket contained two Stripper clips with 5rnds each ... now I’m going to have to dig one out because I don’t remember what it said on the button...

Yes, holy crap! That is the most miserable round I’ve ever shot, but at the time you could get a Turkish Mauser for $35 (but you had to buy 5) and the 1200 round case of ammo was $59.95 ... so including shipping you could get a battle rifle & case of ammo for just over than $100 ... I keep 2 rifles so after selling the other 3 rifles I actually less than that In them.
Ahhh, the good old days!


If you really want something you'll find a way ...
... if you don't you'll find an excuse.

I'm really not a "kid" anymore ... but I haven't grown up yet either Wink
 
Posts: 5700 | Registered: January 11, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kimberkid:
quote:
Originally posted by IndianaBoy:
<snip>
I had a bandolier of Turkish 8mm back in the early 2000s. Holy crap......

Sounds like what I’ve still got a case of, cloth bandolier with 8-10 pockets closed with a small steel button, each pocket contained two Stripper clips with 5rnds each ... now I’m going to have to dig one out because I don’t remember what it said on the button...

Yes, holy crap! That is the most miserable round I’ve ever shot, but at the time you could get a Turkish Mauser for $35 (but you had to buy 5) and the 1200 round case of ammo was $59.95 ... so including shipping you could get a battle rifle & case of ammo for just over than $100 ... I keep 2 rifles so after selling the other 3 rifles I actually less than that In them.
Ahhh, the good old days!


That Turkish stuff has some snap but... if you want some 8mm love shoot some of the Austrian Nazi marked 8x56R in a M95 straight pull carbine. If you have one remove your partial because it is probably coming out.
 
Posts: 4022 | Registered: January 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    caliber debate 6.5 Swede or 8mm Mauser

© SIGforum 2024