Go  New  Find  Notify  Tools  Reply 
Freethinker 
Bryan Litz is the Chief Ballistician for Berger Bullets and his background includes working for the US Air Force on airtoair missile design and being an accomplished long range rifle competitor. He is (as I understand it) the author of the Applied Ballistics solver that seems to be enjoying great popularity among students of the science. It is, for example, the software provided in the current Kestrel weather monitors that include ballistics calculators. The first of his several books I purchased was the second edition of Applied Ballistics for LongRange Shooting. I regret to say that that book sat mostly ignored on a bookshelf for a long time. I was primarily interested in its description of various bullets, especially their G7 ballistics coefficients that I used with other calculators. A few weeks ago, however, I finally decided to read the part of the book before the bullet data tables and could only rue having previously ignored it. I had read several other books about firearms ballistics in the past and had used several ballistics solvers. I therefore didn’t expect to be exposed to much, if anything, new. I couldn’t have been more wrong. Not only does Litz discuss all the topics about long range rifle shooting ballistics that others cover, he does it in ways that I find unusually detailed and clear. Perhaps most useful are the examples he cites that are based on actual field experiments. Other authors may mention things like spin drift and the effects of rifling twist rate on precision, but almost invariably on the basis of theory alone. At this point I’ll make my general criticism of the books. For the reader who frets about such things as “it’s” versus “its,” we (I, anyway) would have appreciated prepublication reviews by an editor who understood them, not to mention obvious typographical errors. In one instance I found numerical values that differed slightly on two successive pages. In addition, there is some duplication among the books. That helps reinforce the information, but affects one’s perception of how good a value they are. It’s also important to understand that although the author continually stresses how his bullet ballistics data is more valid than standard G1 and G7 ballistic coefficients, the differences among G1, G7, and his own custom drag curves become significant only at long ranges that are beyond the distances most riflemen shoot. In fact, if the shooter never engages targets beyond 500 yards and doesn’t really care about why his bullets hit where, only that they do, many (but not all) of the topics in the books are probably not for him. If, however, the shooter is like me and wants to truly understand all the factors that affect rifle ballistics regardless of how much practical value that may ever be, then I cannot recommend the books too highly. In addition, I’ve found that it’s somewhat difficult to fully understand all the features of the Applied Ballistics solvers used in Kestrel devices, and that are available online and as smartphone apps. I couldn’t, for example, understand why a crosswind affected the vertical trajectory of shots at long ranges when nothing else changed. When I contacted the makers of the Kestrel instrument, the NielsenKellerman company, I was told how to eliminate the strange (to me) results I was getting, but not fully why. It took reading about “aerodynamic jump” for it to finally become clear. One other thing about terminology: Litz uses “precision” to refer to the inherent ability of a rifle and its ammunition to group the shots close together. It’s what benchrest shooters strive for: smallest groups without regard to where they hit on the target. “Accuracy” refers to hitting what the rifle is aimed at. A rifle and load that’s capable of consistent 2inch groups at 500 yards would satisfy most people as being precise, but if the goal was to hit a 5inch plate and they all hit 10 inches left of its center, it wouldn’t be accurate by Litz’s definition. I’ll use his terminology. In addition, firearms ballistics are separated into subcategories. The books being reviewed are mostly about external ballistics, which are the things like wind and gravity outside the gun that affect a bullet’s flight. The other term for the same thing is exterior ballistics, and although Litz seems to prefer “external,” he uses “exterior” as well, sometimes on the same page. Other primary subcategories are internal or interior ballistics, which are factors inside the gun like chamber pressure. Terminal ballistics, which includes the subsubcategory of “wound ballistics,” is about what happens when a bullet hits something such as a game animal. The following reviews of the individual books briefly describe each of their sections and individual topics. Please ask questions if you want further details. The books I most recommend reading are the two volumes of Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting. Applied Ballistics for LongRange Shooting, second (2011) and third (2015) editions. As mentioned, the second edition of the book was my first Litz work. These two books come with a disc loaded with a version of the Applied Ballistics solver. It’s not, however, as comprehensive as the expensive one that can be purchased online directly from the company. Chapter 1. Fundamentals and Definitions: Deterministic and nondeterministic variables: The differences between things like gravity drop and spin drift that can be precisely determined in advance with a good calculator and good inputs versus the effects of wind. Not that wind effects can’t be calculated, but that wind is very difficult to measure precisely while shooting. Accuracy and precision. The shooting objective. What purpose do we have in shooting? If, for example, we’re shooting only at targets whose distances are known exactly, a flat trajectory matters less than resistance to wind deflection. Ballistic merit: muzzle velocity, ballistic coefficient, trajectory (including “point blank range”), wind deflection, kinetic energy, other factors. Chapter 2. Ballistic coefficient: What it is, why it’s important, and especially the difference between G1 and G7 drag curves. Practical longrange experiments to confirm calculations. Chapter 3. Gravity drop: “point blank range” trajectory; advantages of flat trajectories; the value of a precise and accurate rangefinder; “danger space”; zeroing considerations; different trajectories’ crossover points. Chapter 4. Uphill/downhill shooting: the effects of gravity versus air drag when shooting uphill or downhill; the “improved rifleman’s rule” (or “method”). Chapter 5. Wind deflection: a comprehensive discussion of how and why wind affects the bullet’s flight; near/far wind; mechanism of wind deflection; wind gradient (differing deflection effects based on the height of the bullet above the ground); variable crosswinds; vertical winds; vertical deflection caused by purely horizontal crosswinds (“aero jump”). Chapter 6. Gyroscopic drift (spin drift): Explanation of the phenomenon and how to deal with it; how it differs with some common bullets, including the effects of different rifling twist rates and directions (left or right). Chapter 7. Coriolis effect: How the rotation of the Earth affects the path of the bullet, both horizontally and vertically (the second is usually ignored by other discussions of the effect). Chapter 8. Using ballistics programs: their features; validating programs; field experiments to confirm calculations; introduction to uncertainty analysis (how do small uncertainties in velocities, wind, target distance, ballistic coefficient, air density, and aiming affect expected results); use of density altitude for calculations. Chapter 9. “Controlling” our sights: discussion of the “cold bore” effect; confirming windage and elevation tracking; the effects of sight cant (tilt from horizontal) and the importance of using a sight level; use of aperture (nonoptical “iron”) sights; trajectory validation or “truing.” Chapter 10. Bullet stability: a technical discussion of what factors affect a bullet’s ability to fly point forward; why the .30 caliber 168 grain Sierra MatchKing bullet is unsuited for long distance shooting; the effects of transonic speeds; “going to sleep.” Chapter 11. Extended long range shooting: understanding transonic (transition from supersonic to subsonic) effects; Applied Ballistics custom drag bullet profiles; effects of twist rates; effects of bullet shapes; effects of different rifling types; effects of atmospheric conditions; importance of accurate range determination. Chapter 12. “Interesting Facts and Trends”: this chapter covers a wide range of topics. Scaling effects (larger/smaller calibers and weights); bullet energy, both linear and rotational; twist rates and muzzle velocity; nature of bullet dispersion, including the claim that some rifles produce smaller minute of angle groups at longer distances than at shorter ranges. Chapters 13 and 14. Two technical chapters discussing in detail how small variations can affect precision and accuracy, and how they can be modeled. Chapter 15: Lethality of long range hunting bullets: Discussion of accuracy and “Matunas’ Optimal Game Weight” formula based on bullet and game characteristics. Chapter 16 (second edition): Hit probability for hunting: A discussion of how ballistics and other variables affect hunters’ ability to effectively hit game animals. Chapter 16 (third edition): Weapon Employment Zone (WEZ) Analysis: Discussion of a method to “figure out your hit percentage.” … 1) So that you can know if a shot is a high confidence or low confidence shot given your rifle system and field uncertainties. 2) So that you can do ballistic performance analyses to determine how to best improve your equipment and increase your hit percentage in a given application. The WEZ analysis is an advanced feature of the Applied Ballistics solver that uses target size, rifle precision, and the uncertainties of bullet velocity, range estimation, and wind estimation to calculate the percentage likelihood of hitting a particular type of target. The discussion also includes evaluation of the effects of shooting at different altitudes (shooting at high altitude improves one’s probabilities). Chapter 17. Anatomy of a bullet: discussion of the shape and design of different bullets; boat tails; why flatbased bullets are used by benchrest shooters for maximum precision; boat tail shape and drag; rebated boat tail designs; ogive profiles (tangent, secant, hybrid); bullet nose profiles; meplat considerations, including modifications. Chapter 18. Monolithic bullets: pros and cons of using bullets that are made of a solid piece of one type of metal rather than separate jacket and core. Chapter 19 (second edition). “Using the experimental data”: a discussion of how the exact drag curves of specific bullets were developed; comments on specific bullet brands (Sierra, Berger, Hornady, etc.). Chapter 19 (third edition). Ballistic Performance of Rifle Bullets: The third edition does not contain the same detailed bullet data discussed below, and this chapter serves as an introduction to the separate book of that title. The bullet descriptions in the third edition are limited to sectional density, G7 form factor, and average G1 and G7 ballistic coefficients (BC). For the BC at more specific velocities; bullet dimensions, including lengths (required for certain calculations); and stability factors, Ballistic Performance of Rifle Bullets is now the book required. Most of the remainder of the second edition (almost half, or ~260 pages) is data on specific bullets: dimensions, including ogive radius, meplat diameter; sectional density; stability factors with various rifling twist rates, and ballistic coefficients (G1 and G7) and drag curves at different muzzle velocities. At the very end of both editions are several pages with various formulas from kinetic energy to stability. The third edition of the book differs little from the second edition except as discussed under the specific chapters above, and does not contain the detailed bullet data library of the second edition. Ballistic Performance of Rifle Bullets, third edition (2017). This book is a vast, 750 page data library of detailed information about many commercial rifle bullets. The bullets’ dimensions are detailed along with ballistic coefficient and performance at a wide range of velocities. In addition, the data contains information on rifling twist rates required for bullet stability. Next are volumes I and II of Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting. It seems that at least one more volume is planned based on the cover designs. These books cover many of the same ballistics topics as Applied Ballistics for LongRange Shooting, but the discussions tend to be less detailed and technical. Many other topics about the practical aspects of long range shooting are also included. Volume I (2014). From the introduction: “[This book] aims to end the misinformation which is so prevalent in long range shooting. By applying the scientific method and taking a Myth Buster approach, the state of the art is advanced both in terms of the available tools, and the knowledge to best apply them.” Chapter 1: Twist Rate and Muzzle Velocity. This chapter discusses how rifling twist rate affects muzzle velocity both on a theoretical and practical experiment basis. The answer? Yes, but to no practical degree. Chapter 2: Stability and Drag  Supersonic. A discussion of the effects of rifling types and twist rates on bullet stability in the supersonic velocity range. Chapter 3: Stability and Drag  Transonic. A discussion of the causes and effects of drag in the velocity range from supersonic to subsonic (long distances). This is the range in which the differences between the G1 and G7 drag models becomes most important. Theory and practical experimentation. Chapter 4: Spin Rate Decay. Increase of stability with distance traveled. Effect of barrel length on stability. Elevation (altitude) effects. Practical measurement of spin decay. Chapter 5. Effect of Twist Rate on Precision. How twist rates affect precision (small groups), and why slower rates are better for precision, but not for stability. Why thin bullet jackets are usually better for precision. Why better quality bullets are less sensitive to twist rate variations. Results of live fire precision tests with different twist rate barrels. Why betterstabilized bullets travel through the transonic velocity zone with less drag Chapter 6. Modern Long Range Rifles: A discussion about “a few essential items which are truly advancing the performance of modern long range rifles.” Overall cartridge length constraints of various magazines and guns. The value of cartridges using smaller caliber bullets with higher ballistic coefficients (BCs). The importance (again) of barrel rifling twist rates for long bullets with the highest BCs. Chapter 7. Advancement in Optics: A discussion of the importance of good optical sights for long range shooting, especially adjustment range and mechanical reliability. In this chapter and elsewhere in the Litz books he stresses the need to ensure that elevation tracking is accurate, that is, that if turning the elevation knob 12 clicks is supposed to raise the point of impact by 3 minutes of angle, that that’s what happens. It’s 3 MOA, not 2.8 or 3.1 MOA. He also discusses the advantages of “holding” reticles such as the Horus TreMoR2. His opinion of Ballistic (or Bullet) Drop Compensating (BDC) reticles is expressed as “Although the simplicity of ballistic turrets and reticles is appealing, their effective range is typically limited to short and medium ranges where environmental effects are less consequential.” Chapter 8. Long Range Hunting Bullets: Most of the discussion in all the Litz books are about bullets intended and suitable for target shooting. This chapter discusses a number of bullets suitable for hunting. Chapter 9. Rise of the 30 Caliber: A discussion of 0.30 caliber bullets and comparing them with other modern offerings. Chapter 10. Evolution of FULLBORE Bullets: A discussion of the International FULLBORE (Palma) shooting competition. Chapter 11. State of the Art Ballistic Modeling: Discussion of ballistic solvers (calculators), including live fire testing and validations. The importance of accurate input data: target distance, zero distance, muzzle velocity, ballistic coefficient, accurate scope adjustments, atmospheric station pressure. Less important or “it depends”: air temperature, slant (up/down) angle, sight height, latitude and azimuth (Coriolis effects). Chapter 12. Accounting for Secondary Effects: Verifying spin drift (live fire testing); aerodynamic jump (vertical displacement in horizontal crosswind); Miller stability formula (much more accurate for modern bullets than Greenhill); Coriolis effect—its horizontal and vertical components. Chapter 13. Modern Drag Modeling: Validating the theories. Chapter 14. WEZ (Weapon Employment Zone) Modeling: All the factors that affect hitting the target (accuracy) and how they can be incorporated into calculations to determine the probability of a hit at various ranges. Chapter 15. Measuring Muzzle Velocity: Detailed discussion about use and evaluation of various current (2014) chronographs. Chapter 16. Laser Rangefinders: Detailed discussion about use and evaluation of various rangefinders. Chapter 17. Wind Measurement: The importance and difficulty of accurate wind speed measurements and how it remains the aspect of long range shooting that has seen the least improvement in recent years. Chapter 18. Modern Ballistic Instrumentation: Recent ballistic solvers (calculators) and instruments. The book ends with a list of specific mathematical formulas discussed and bullet data information as discussed above. Volume II (2016). Chapter 1. Understanding Dispersion: Measuring dispersion, including the statistical value of different numbers of shots in precision measurement groups, and the statistical methods of comparing groups fired with different numbers of shots. How measuring mean radius is a better method than overall group size. Further discussion of spin rate versus precision. Benchrest bullets. Chapter 2. Angular Group Convergence: Yes, convergence, or the notion that the angular size of groups (e.g., in minutes of angle) can become smaller at long distances than at short ranges. For example, a claim that someone’s consistent groups measure 1 inch at 100 yards, but 1.5 inches at 200 yards rather than the 2 inches (or larger) we would expect. This chapter is a comprehensive discussion of the idea and explores the possible reasons for the phenomenon, including through the results of over 70 live fire test groups—if it truly exists. I found the book worth owning for that reason alone. Chapter 3. Bullet Trimming and Pointing: Manufacturing methods used for open tip match bullets usually leave their meplats (tips) somewhat ragged and ununiform. That lack of uniformity affects the bullets’ ballistic coefficients and therefore can result in vertical stringing at long ranges. There are two primary ways of correcting the lack of uniformity, trimming the point in a manner similar to trimming a cartridge case mouth, and swaging (forming) the point into a more uniform shape. This chapter discusses the methods, to include their effectiveness and other pros and cons. Chapter 4. Powder Measurement: This chapter examines the value of different methods of powder measurement and the effects of such things as cartridge case (brass) and primer selection for producing the most consistent, uniform muzzle velocities. The importance of accurate chronograph readings is reiterated. Chapter 5. Flash Hole Deburring: What it says. Chapter 6. Neck Tension: What it says. Chapter 7. Fill Ratio. The effects of changing how completely cartridge cases are filled with powder. Chapter 8. Performance Evaluation of Laser Rangefinders: What it says (update from volume I). Chapter 9. Rimfire Ammunition: The results of extensive testing of different 22 Long Rifle ammunition. Chapter 10. Aerodynamic Drag Modeling for Ballistics: A detailed discussion of ballistic coefficients and related matters pertaining to atmospheric drag and bullet performance. Chapter 11. Advancements in Barrel Technology: An evaluation of several high quality barrels, including fluted and carbon fiber wrapped models. An interesting part of the discussion was about barrel stiffness and the effects of firing multiple rounds to warm the material and its effects on point of impact shift. The remainder of the book consisted of an updated bullet data library, laser rangefinder performance charts, and mathematical formulas. Accuracy and Precision for Long Range Shooting: A Practical Guide for Riflemen (2012). “[This] is a book for riflemen who want to understand the important elements of their craft. All too often, ambitious shooters strive to hit smaller targets at greater distances, without a clear understanding of what’s really required for success. … Critical thinking 101: In order to get better at hitting targets, we must understand what causes us to miss targets.” Chapter 1. Overview of Methodology: The Weapon Employment Zone (WEZ) analysis (described above) is used throughout the book. Chapter 2. Example WEZ Calculation: This example uses a rifle with 24 inch barrel chambered for 308 Winchester and firing the 175 grain Sierra MatchKing bullet at 2600 feet per second. Variables are crosswind estimates, rifle/ammunition precision (group sizes), velocity consistency, atmospheric conditions (elevation above sea level), and target size. Chapter 3. Wind Uncertainty: A closer examination of the effects of uncertainties in wind speed estimates. Chapter 4. Range Uncertainty: A closer examination of the effects of uncertainties in target distance estimates. Chapter 5. Inherent Precision: An examination of the effects of rifle/ammunition precision, or their ability to produce small, consistent groups. Chapter 6. Muzzle Velocity Effects: An examination of the effects of variations in muzzle velocity. Chapter 7. Accurate Shooting—Basics: Factors pertaining to the ability to hit one’s target, including the effects on the actual zero (point of aim = point of impact) of shooting from different positions; the optimum zeroing range; and understanding one’s sights, including the need to ensure they track accurately. Chapter 8. Leveling Your Sights: The reasons why it’s important that the rifle is not canted (tipped) with respect to gravity when shooting. Chapter 9. Trajectory Modeling: This information is similar to what is presented in other books about the topic. The important discussions concern the importance of accurate inputs such as muzzle velocity and ballistic coefficients. There is also more detailed discussion of the effects of different atmospheric conditions (humidity, temperature) that doesn’t appear in the other books in the series. Chapter 10. Secondary Trajectory Effects: Coverage of spin drift, including WEZ targets; and Coriolis effects. The book points out that Coriolis effects may need to be considered on small targets as close as 500 yards. Chapter 11. Calibrating Ballistics Solutions: “The idea is to correct the inputs based on observed drop, thereby calibrating the program to be more accurate.” This is a feature of the Applied Ballistics solver installed in the Kestrel 5700 weather monitor, but only after working with another version of the calculator did I discover that it’s not useful unless shooting at extended ranges (generally ≥1000 yards). The discussion is, however, very detailed and useful if it can be employed. Chapter 12. Live Fire Verification: The results of live fire with various rifles and cartridges to verify the WEZ theoretical results. Chapter 13. 300 Winchester Magnum: WEZ Analysis. Chapter 14. 300 Win Mag vs. 338 Lapua Mag: WEZ Analysis. Chapter 15. Score Shooting: WEZ Analysis factors relating to shooting at bull’seye targets. Chapter 16. Wind Sensor Array: A discussion of wind issues and technological efforts to determine precise wind effects to the target. Chapter 17. Varmint Hunting: WEZ Analysis of various varmint hunting loads. Chapter 18. Medium and Big Game Hunting: WEZ Analysis of various loads for hunting those animals. Chapter 19. Military and Tactical Shooting: WEZ Analysis of military rifles. M4 carbine with M855 ammunition; M110 rifle with M118LR; XM2010 with A191 (190 grain 300 Win Mag) ammunition; and Sako TRG42, 338 Lapua Mag, 300 grain Berger Hybrid. At the end of the book is a short bullet data library. “I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.” _{— The Wizard of Oz}  

Member 
Thanks for the review Sigfruend. I own a Kestrel 5700 with the ballistic calculator. You are correct when stating beyond 500 yards it starts to give some incorrect data. I just got back from doing load development all day. From 6001000 yards I was .2.3 mils low when using the Kestrel's data. When creating the custom curve one must adjust muzzle velocity to match the actual real world numbers and then one can create a custom ballistic curve. It will get you in the "ballpark" according the conversation I had with Kestrel. The reason is no two rifles perform the same. There are too many variables at play. It's a tool in the tool belt, but certainly not the end all, be all.  

Freethinker 
Some gun owners might still be interested in these subjects.  

Ammoholic 
At the long range course I took last month, there was a lot of classroom discussion about Litz and his work. Great stuff.  

Freethinker 
And still possibly.  

Member 
Great write up. I've read some of Litz's stuff, it's pretty good. It gets to the underlying science of shooting.  

Member 
I'm not sure how I missed this excellent writeup so far, but then again, my presence here varies depending on work pressures. I must say, sigfreund, that your analysis and critique are right on. I have bought Bryan's books as they come out since I receive an email from his outfit whenever he has a new one. I have to agree with the spelling mistakes and syntax and I have sent him a few emails with corrections. I have been meeting Bryan at every major match Fclass match for many years now and he is a fierce competitor. I also run into his father, Bill Litz, and he is also a fierce competitor. He's more my age though, so we do chat sometimes. There's not much more I can say about his books that you haven't already said; they are excellent, very detailed and he breaks down the subject well enough that an old geezer like me can actually understand the concepts he presents. If you're into long range shooting, especially competition, and you have not read his books, you're shortchanging yourself.  

Member 
Personally  I think that his second and third books are the best. Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting and Accuracy and Precision For Long Range Shooting. His first book  Applied Ballistics for Long Range Shooting is deeply rooted in the older days of 308 ballistics. Still applicable, but smaller, faster, and lighter have taken a solid root in todays ballistics. His books are getting well used and reread. I tend to grab them for airline travel. But, they do tend to get a second/third look while at Foreign Customs/Immigration. Definitely worth a read. Andrew Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language  Gen Robert E Lee.  

Member 
Interesting comment, I have noticed just the opposite, especially for the long range. The bullets are longer, heavier and not as fast. Yet they fly better and faster because BC.  

Member 
I agree with Longer/Heavier in the Extreme Long Range business....ie. longer than 1500yds. But for the long range that is commonly available, most have moved away from the 308 field artillery and moved to the .265 family or smaller. But this observation may be SE Region specific. I can't see smaller and lighter holding in Texas wind very well nor cross canyon winds in Colorado. Andrew Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language  Gen Robert E Lee.  

Member 
Perhaps it is a regional thing. However, overall the trend has been to heavier/longer for caliber bullets and then a shift to the proper caliber. I know nothing of extreme long range, my experience stops at 1000 yards. SO, in Fclass we have currently 2 divisions: FOpen and FTR. FOpen can use any caliber they want up to and including .338 caliber, within the confines of the rules: 22 pounds on the rifle and no muzzle brake. The 6mm was a darling for that crowd until they got their act together and moved on up to the 6.5X284 with heavy/long bullets. The bullets kept getting longer and heavier and then early in this decade, the 6.5X284 queen was deposed and replaced by the 7mm or pure .284. Again the 7mm bullets got longer and heavier to the point where the current top bullets are 180+grains. In the meantime, lots of people have been working with the heavy .30s with BCs that are just sick, and winning matches. FTR is stuck with .223 or .308 and as I've written many times in the past, the trend has been towards heavier/longer bullets. The days of 155gr Palma bullets whizzing out at 3000FPS in FTR are long gone. Now the reigning champs send out 200210gr bullets at 26002700FPS and the 155 just can't compete. The .308 with its standard load of 147/150gr bullet was not designed for long range. It was used as such, because that's what the military had on hand. Competition was the driving force behind getting the .308 to shoot accurately to 1000 yards. The military snipers would not get consistent results much past 5600 yards with the .308 even with their M118 LR ammo, first with a 173gr bullet then with a 175gr SMK. Competitors know that the 175SMK is the bottom of the barrel for LR .308 bullets and the standard issue 24 inch barrel simply isn't up to the task of getting that bullet to 1000 yards with any reasonable chance of hitting the target. This is why the military use the 300 WM, the .338 LM and the 50 BMG. If you read Bryan's books, he talks about the engagement distances and the percentage of success at longer ranges. Now, competition was the driving force behind the new darling of the long range crowd, the 6.5 Creedmoor, even its name is an homage to its competition pedigree. Yes, it's lighter and faster than the .308 that it was designed to supplant, but it doesn't hold a candle to the heavier 7mm, .300WM, .30SAUM, .338LM and so on. If Bryan's books have taught us anything it's that BC is king in ballistics and that BS is a function of SD and shape. Bryan explains that in meticulous detail in his books and he also introduced the notion that spin rate has an effect on precision. That's why my current barrels for my .308 that push 210gr bullets is faster that 1:9. The 6mm is still a darling of the competitors, but they only pull it out when there is no wind. And even then the bullets they use are all long/heavy for caliber.  

Member 
Interesting that you say this about the stability/spin in 308. About 7 years ago when building a switch barrel rifle, I had it set up with a 223 bolt and a 308 bolt. My gunsmith (Moon Roberts at Crescent Customs) and I worked with Bartlein Barrels to create a hypertwist 308 barrel. It is measured at 1:7.7 and will stabilize 165220gr projectiles. Below 165, they will spin destruct. It was crazy accurate at longer distances with heavy weight projectiles. Never finished "playing" with all the data. Got caught up in the 6.5CM then 6 Dasher crazy in the PRS competition field. Andrew Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language  Gen Robert E Lee.  

Member 
The principle here is that the high spin rate prevents the bullet from wobbling at the start and thus present nonoptimum angles to the wind and lose velocity that way. By twisting it faster the bullet is much more solid in its axis of rotation when it first encounters the fierce 2600MPH wind. By keeping a high spin rate throughout the flight envelope, the bullet does not lose velocity more than it should. Bryan does not that a faster spin rate does not increase the BC of the bullet, rather it serves to preserve it, or not have it decay as quickly. As for selfimmolating bullets, the 6mm is notorious for that. I have seen that occur several times over the years. The shooter presses the trigger, the gun fires and there is no hit on the paper, but about 75 yards downrange you can discern the rapid formation of a cylindrical puff of dirty white smoke that disappears almost as quickly as it was formed. Then you are rewarded with the quizzical look on the shooter's face as you contort yourself into a pretzel trying not to laugh out loud, too much.  

Member 
Caliber is likely more dependent on the type of competition, rather than the physical region. 6mm for PRStype competitions is alive and well in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming competitions  locations that can experience their fair share of wind. 6mm works in such matches where people shoot from unstable positions, where recoil reduction is important to spot impacts, and where target distances are reasonable. 6.5mm has an advantage over 6mm in PRStype and field matches where shooting positions are more stable, and distances are more often at or beyond 1000ish yards. Certain 6.5 bullets have a BC advantage over the 6s, making wind drift a little easier to deal with at the longer distances. 7mm magnums seem to be doing well in the sortakinda ELR matches, where some positional shooting still exists. Nightforce's QCreek ELR match in Wyoming is one example. I've shot it with 6.5CM and was undergunned on its long stages. 6mm really isn't an option. The guys in my squad with 7 SAUM did really quite well there. The 30cal magnums did great, but with noticeably more abuse from recoil. For the last couple of years we had a number of steel targets in the 6001100 yard ballpark, and my 6.5 worked fine here. I struggled at 1200 yards and beyond. I hit the 16001800 yard targets on occasion, but not with the frequency of the bigger bore magnums. Last year's 2100 yard target was just a frickin' joke for me in the wind and rain. You're probably aware that PRS limits matches to 30cal if one choose to chase points, so the 338s are not common. It's my understanding that this year's QCreek ELR match will be bigger, longer, and have more heavyweight shooters. We will probably see a fair share of 338s and 375s. Targets will likely be set further out, otherwise the 375s will just be breaking the steel targets and their supports. I plan on just having fun with my dainty 6.5, although I'm testing the 147 ELD bullets in order to improve wind drift over my normal 140 ELDs.  

medlem 
Great post. I've been looking at his books for some time trying to figure out which to get first. This definitely helps.  

Member 
That is a great post! Thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge. ____ I'm filled with gratitude for the blessings I've received.  

Freethinker 
Perhaps still of interest.  

Member 
VOL 1, Chapter 5. Comparing twist rates on target. I've shot out 8 barrels chambered in 6 Dasher, all 8 twist. Also 1 1/2 barrels with 7.25 twist. Shooting Berger 105 Hybrids at 29202980 and 115 Dtacs at 28502880. 7.25 twist was recommended by a barrel manufacturer for the Dtacs. 8 twist stabilized the 115 Dtacs no problem at a density altitude of 300011,000. Currently have 2 barrels chambered in 6BRA, both 7.5 twist shooting 105 Hybrids and 105 VLD Hunting at 29202950. Absolutely give the edge to the 8 twist in accuracy on target even though especially in the Dtac's case are better stabilized with a 7.25/7.5 twist. Moving forward only using 8 twist barrels.  

Powered by Social Strata 
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... 