SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Windham Weaponry's "A1 Government"
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Windham Weaponry's "A1 Government" Login/Join 
Member
posted
This rifle is somewhat of a mishmash of A1 and A2 features, but Windham seems to be testing the "Retro" waters. It will probably appeal to those who want the general retro look and aren't picky about details. Think it will be a decent seller for Windham?

https://www.windhamweaponry.co...rifle/a1-government/
 
Posts: 78 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
posted Hide Post
I know MSRP is not street price, but it would seem that Brownell's BRN-16A1, with its A1 profile bbl, would be more authentic, for a lower price.

I had to be the crotchety-old-geezer on this one, but it takes more than just an A1 upper to make a "retro" AR.
 
Posts: 17603 | Registered: August 12, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Agree completely with LDD. You can put a rifle together that looks like that for a lot less. I don't see them selling a lot of those.

If they were smart, they'd reach out to one of the M-16 subcontractors and work out a branding rights agreement. That might help.


What, me worry?
 
Posts: 2004 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: September 27, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
To Do What is
Right and Just
posted Hide Post
I'm with LDD. If retro is what I want then that's a hard pass. If money was no option then I'd have a retro, but since everything I own ends up having a use or purpose with black guns that revolves around work or HD, then not for me for now.
 
Posts: 2288 | Location: Usually Somewhere | Registered: July 28, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
...with an A2 barrel...

well I give them credit for trying Smile

-----------------------------


Proverbs 27:17 - As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.
 
Posts: 7340 | Location: Florida | Registered: September 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
At least they made it in 1/7 twist. I believe Brownell's offering is in 1/12 which pretty much limits you to M193.
 
Posts: 967 | Registered: January 21, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Heck, Windham could market these as a notional "compromise" rifle. Remember, the Army originally thought the M16A2 was unsuitable for Army use. According to a study commissioned in the 1980's, the Army's opinion was:

(1) The M16A1 is more accurate than the M16A2 out to 500 meters.

(2) The M16A1 is more reliable than the M16A2

(3) The Army thought that the preferred barrel twist should be 1:9, not 1:7. A 1:9 twist would theoretically result in longer barrel life, among other things

(4) The Army was very much against the new rear sight, believing that it was easily damaged and prone to losing zero. And more suited to Marine requirements than Army ones.

(5) The Army didn't like the new extended buttstock, maintaining that it was unsuitable for smaller individuals and those wearing body armor.

(6) The Army didn't like the new A2 barrel profile. They said that the barrel was "heavy in the wrong place" and that a sort of HBAR profile might be more effective.

(7) The Army thought that the three-round burst feature was a mistake, citing experience from Vietnam where full-auto was quite effective in many instances.
 
Posts: 78 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 1KPerDay
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by blasto:
At least they made it in 1/7 twist. I believe Brownell's offering is in 1/12 which pretty much limits you to M193.
You have a billion other choices if you want a modern rifle. Retro builds should be retro, IMO.


---------------------------
My hovercraft is full of eels.
 
Posts: 1990 | Registered: February 27, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 1KPerDay:
quote:
Originally posted by blasto:
At least they made it in 1/7 twist. I believe Brownell's offering is in 1/12 which pretty much limits you to M193.
You have a billion other choices if you want a modern rifle. Retro builds should be retro, IMO.


Agree totally. Don’t get the thought that people want a gun as accurately retro as possible, but then whine about having a 1/12 barrel. Are people really shooting heavy bullets out of a retro build? 55 grain FMJ 5.56 is readily available.
 
Posts: 1894 | Location: South FL | Registered: February 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Well, I can see going with a better twist and making a great shootin' retro. It isn't like you can see the twist rate. I also understand hard core retro enthusiasts wanting every detail exact...but they're probably rollin' their own anyways.

OTOH, the A2 barrel and stock is full of derp. The lightweight barrel profile and shorter A1 stock made for a better handling carbine anyway.




“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik

The world's a dangerous place, we can help! http://portlandfirearmtraining.com/
 
Posts: 4376 | Location: Oregon | Registered: October 02, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Picked this up today from my FFL. Windham makes a nice looking rifle:

 
Posts: 78 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Windham Weaponry's "A1 Government"

© SIGforum 2019