SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    question about LEO purchasing rifles

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Aquino914
Posted
This is probably just wishful thinking but I was wondering if LEO's would be able to buy maybe like a G36c or a rifle of that sort.
im in the academy now and it would be really neat if that was possible..lol


___________________________
Sig sauer 228 W. Germany
Glock 19

Arghhhh...Bullets....My only weakness....How Did You know?!?!

~Harold& Kumar~

 
Posts: 524 | Registered: July 11, 2005Report This Post
Member
Picture of PPGMD
Posted Hide Post
If the firearm is a machine gun only the LE agency can purchase it.

If it's not a machine gun, but it's prevented from import because of the sporting clause there was a loop hole (not sure if it applies anymore) where a LE agency can purchase it, own it for a year, and then be able to sell it. I don't believe this loop hole applies for any NFA items.


-------
Mr. Doom and Gloom
 
Posts: 4830 | Location: KITD/FOHS | Registered: February 13, 2008Report This Post
Member
Picture of Aquino914
Posted Hide Post
awww i guess semi it is!


___________________________
Sig sauer 228 W. Germany
Glock 19

Arghhhh...Bullets....My only weakness....How Did You know?!?!

~Harold& Kumar~

 
Posts: 524 | Registered: July 11, 2005Report This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
SIG and FNH have either rebate or special pricing for a majority of thier products to LEO's. Some you can purchase with a sign-off from your Chief, provided it ships to your Department. FNH requires that it be retained for twelve months after purchase. A lot of aftermarket manufacturers (LaRue) etc., offer some type of discounts on products they actually make. I don't think H&K gives a crap as far as helping anybody out purchasing thier product.....
 
Posts: 189 | Registered: January 21, 2008Report This Post
Member
Picture of Gibb
Posted Hide Post
A question regarding LEO and NFA weapons.

If a LEO purchases a machine gun with approval from his chief, say an MP5 for example, then leaves for whatever reason, is he able to keep said weapon, or does it transfer to his last station?

I've always wondered this. No real life scenarios, just a curiosity.




I shall respect you until you open your mouth, from that point on, you must earn it yourself.
 
Posts: 444 | Location: Southern Maine | Registered: February 10, 2008Report This Post
Member
Picture of PPGMD
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gibb:
If a LEO purchases a machine gun with approval from his chief, say an MP5 for example, then leaves for whatever reason, is he able to keep said weapon, or does it transfer to his last station?


Only government agencies can register new machines guns. So the gun would be owned by the agency.


-------
Mr. Doom and Gloom
 
Posts: 4830 | Location: KITD/FOHS | Registered: February 13, 2008Report This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by blasto:
SIG and FNH have either rebate or special pricing for a majority of thier products to LEO's. Some you can purchase with a sign-off from your Chief, provided it ships to your Department. FNH requires that it be retained for twelve months after purchase. A lot of aftermarket manufacturers (LaRue) etc., offer some type of discounts on products they actually make. I don't think H&K gives a crap as far as helping anybody out purchasing thier product.....


My understanding is that firearms sold to government agencies or officers for official use are not charged the Federal excise tax that is collected on guns sold to mere civilians. ATF requires the gun to be held for the 12 months, not the maker. If the gun is sold before the 12 months is up, then the FET must be collected and turned into ATF. You can see the nightmare that would turn into.
 
Posts: 759 | Location: Merryland | Registered: October 13, 2008Report This Post
LDD
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PPGMD:
If the firearm is a machine gun only the LE agency can purchase it.

If it's not a machine gun, but it's prevented from import because of the sporting clause there was a loop hole (not sure if it applies anymore) where a LE agency can purchase it, own it for a year, and then be able to sell it. I don't believe this loop hole applies for any NFA items.


How does this work for a gun that is "easily converted" from semi-auto into a full auto?

Let's set aside M16s, because of how the receiver is registered and the obvious extra hole.

So, for simplicity, let's focus on HK style guns where the auto part is mainly controled by the trigger group (ok, and bolt carrier, but anyone can get a F/A bolt).

For instance, in the civilian realm, a real MSG90 would be considered an MG becuase it has the push-pin lower.

If your dept orders an MSG90, with true MSG90 trigger group (which is semi), can they transfer it to you after 1 year, or is it considered "once-an-MG-always-an-MG" in the eyes of BATFE?

[I guess same scenario could apply to MP5s, but would include NFA tax if it could be transfered to individual officer as semi-auto SBR]
 
Posts: 10244 | Registered: August 12, 2000Report This Post
Member
Picture of PPGMD
Posted Hide Post
Honestly LDD, I don't know, that is a question for the BATFE. I only know about this loophole because of a PSG-1 that I saw for sale.

But I doubt that the BATFE would allow anything that could easily be converted to a machine gun to be sold to civilians.


-------
Mr. Doom and Gloom
 
Posts: 4830 | Location: KITD/FOHS | Registered: February 13, 2008Report This Post
Military Arms Collector
Picture of darkest2000
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PPGMD:
Honestly LDD, I don't know, that is a question for the BATFE. I only know about this loophole because of a PSG-1 that I saw for sale.

But I doubt that the BATFE would allow anything that could easily be converted to a machine gun to be sold to civilians.


Real PSG1s use the same semi auto shelf that the civilian guns have, so there's no issue of it being an NFA item.

Other examples of post ban weapons sold to government agencies and later released onto the commercial market include the DOC HK94s and occasionally the SG550.
 
Posts: 8071 | Location: Orange County, CA, USA | Registered: March 18, 2003Report This Post
Member
Picture of PPGMD
Posted Hide Post
Real PSG1s are banned from import because of the sporting clause, which is how the loop hole comes up.


-------
Mr. Doom and Gloom
 
Posts: 4830 | Location: KITD/FOHS | Registered: February 13, 2008Report This Post
LDD
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
I think Darkest2000's point was that PSG-1s use Clip&Shelf to secure the trigger group.

MSG90s, while outwardly very similar, use a "military style" pushpin to lock the trigger guard in, up front.

BATFE has ruled that any HK style gun with a pushpin trigger group is an MG, regardless of rate of fire.

I guess the loophole does allow for guns like the PSG-1. I know an officer who personally will own, once he retires, a post 89 Styer AUG (semi-auto).

But the jump from a PSG-1 to an MSG90 is probably insurmountable.

Otherwise, the dept loophole would be an instant post-86 machinegun factory.
 
Posts: 10244 | Registered: August 12, 2000Report This Post
Member
Picture of Aquino914
Posted Hide Post
ok completely off topic, how bout a USP Tactical?
i live in NY so i was wondering how the laws on an LEO purchasing this Handgun would be.


___________________________
Sig sauer 228 W. Germany
Glock 19

Arghhhh...Bullets....My only weakness....How Did You know?!?!

~Harold& Kumar~

 
Posts: 524 | Registered: July 11, 2005Report This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aquino914:
ok completely off topic, how bout a USP Tactical?
i live in NY so i was wondering how the laws on an LEO purchasing this Handgun would be.


That would be up to state law and agency policy. Your agency may or may not sign off on the purchase of non-approved firearms, for non duty use.


_______________________________________________________________________

www.grayguns.com
 
Posts: 12576 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Report This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I would get a DSA FAL, actually I did, 2 of em. They are great weapons for LE, particularly if you can take advantage of their range. They are a little heavy, specially the heavy barrel models. I got a carbine, and a Medium Contour barrel. With the latteer gun, I own the real estate for 6-800 meters depending on ammo used. I use a Kahles 3-7X scope with rangfinding. Love it, you will also.
It is also the easiest rifle in its class to care for, breaks almost like a shotgun for cleaning from the proper end.


The Islamic terrorist express: Go directly to Allah, do not pass hell.
 
Posts: 803 | Location: Xanadu | Registered: May 07, 2006Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    question about LEO purchasing rifles

© SIGforum 2010