|Gracie Allen is my |
^^^ It's my fault. I was giving bubbatime a hard time without actually saying anything. Granted that the OP's question is based around the AR, but other rifles don't have iron sights that can be flipped down. In my experience with red dots on a couple of such rifles, looking at the red dot when the iron sights are in place doesn't really seem to lead to any problems. It's nice to have the less-cluttered sight picture that comes with using a red dot and folded-down irons but, IMHO, bubbatime was a little more vehement than may have been justified.
|Green Mountain Boy|
Absolute. On my AR the sights are high enough as it is and I have flip down buis or none at all.
!~God Bless the U.S. Military~!
If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off
Light travels faster than sound, this is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak
I agree, and admit I didn’t understand what you were getting at.
My “CQB” ARs (training and serious) both have fixed front sights and with a 1/3 view I have never had any problem using them with Aimpoint sights as fast as I could acquire targets. As I mentioned above, I am simply unaware of the iron sights.
And as a somewhat related note, something I have my students practice is using their nonmagnifying optics (Aimpoints, EOTechs, et al.) with the illuminated reticle turned off and no rear BUIS. I just center the target in the “window,” but some shooters like to use the visible front sight (without the rear) as an index even without a rear sight to align it with. With both techniques it’s possible to get reasonably accurate hits on short range targets (to about 15 yards).
“Most men … can seldom accept the simplest and most obvious truth if it … would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions … which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabrics of their lives.”
— Leo Tolstoy
Bought a Holosun HS503GU and just finished mounting it 1/3.
That's how it came set up, and it does seem like a good way to go now that I've looked through it that way. It did come with a low mount, and a battery as well, in case anyone was wondering.
Hope things shoot straight, still need to find out.
Thanks for the responses.
"...and we liked it!"
|Be Well and Keep Your Rifle Clean|
Tried both and have settled on lower 1/3.
"..AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC,...SO HELP ME GOD."
|My hypocrisy goes only so far|
Looking for an Alaskan Malamute? Look here: http://www.moonsongmals.org
Do not send me to a heaven where there are no dogs.
Step Up or Stand Aside: Support the Troops !
|E tan e epi tas|
I like true co-witness. If all goes wrong the red dot becomes a giant ghost ring.
That being said I am no gunfighter nor girlscout and have no desire to run my guns as weapons ever. This is just a low speed, high drag hobbiest's perspective.
"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
|Prince of Cats|
Just don't do what I did, Trijicon MRO and Micro BUIS, the BUIS are 1/2 on, 1/2 under the optic. I can barely see the top nub of the front sight post through the rear aperture and optic.
|Yew got a spider |
on yo head
Not odd at all. Quite reasonable.
IF running a AR with a permanent front sight post/gas block, i prefer 1/3. If running flip up sights, back and front i like absolute.
Edit: i see Grumpy feels the same, had not read his post before posting or would have just said same.
Irons are fixed height. I'm only varying the RDS mount height. The lower 1/3 mount is more comfortable for me. Absolute feels low for my chubby cheeks.
Either way, I don't see the front sight as I'm looking well past it. So 1/3 is more comfortable and that's the primary influence.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - B.Franklin
"Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it." L.Tolstoy
|Casuistic Thinker and Daoist|
Not odd at all, that is my preferred setup also
No, Daoism isn't a religion
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2|