SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    m1 wood weight ?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
m1 wood weight ? Login/Join 
Member
Picture of bendable
posted
anyone ever weigh the wood only on an M1 ?

wondering how much less an M1 would weigh , with a plastic set up.





Safety, Situational Awareness and proficiency.



Neck Ties, Hats and ammo brass, Never ,ever touch'em w/o asking first
 
Posts: 44819 | Location: Henry County , Il | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Avoiding
slam fires
Picture of 45 Cal
posted Hide Post
quote:
with a plastic set up.

What in the hell is wrong with great walnut wood?
I do not want any plastic shit or laminate on my treasures!
 
Posts: 21138 | Location: Georgia | Registered: February 19, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bendable
posted Hide Post
nothing is wrong with it, not a single thing.

the only one that I got to shoot had major wood, and I shot it very well, its a very fun shooter, indeed.

but compared to some other guns it seemed on the heavy side.

just wondering if the weight was mostly from the wood or an abundance of metal





Safety, Situational Awareness and proficiency.



Neck Ties, Hats and ammo brass, Never ,ever touch'em w/o asking first
 
Posts: 44819 | Location: Henry County , Il | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bendable:
the only one that I got to shoot had major wood

<<rimshot>>
 
Posts: 4949 | Location: Colorado | Registered: January 26, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The weight is mostly in the metal. To look at it another way hold a wood m14 stock then a plastic one at most perhaps a half pound difference
 
Posts: 2101 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be Well and Keep Your Rifle Clean
Picture of mrmn50
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 45 Cal:
quote:
with a plastic set up.

What in the hell is wrong with great walnut wood?
I do not want any plastic shit or laminate on my treasures!


MARONE!!!!!




"..AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC,...SO HELP ME GOD."


 
Posts: 20853 | Location: Czechtown,Minnesota | Registered: October 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 3/4Flap
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bendable:
anyone ever weigh the wood only on an M1 ?

wondering how much less an M1 would weigh , with a plastic set up.


I'd be interested, too.

I'm betting it is in some tech specs, but I'm not sure where.

Interesting question.


**********************
"For certainly no legislation can be supposed more wholesome and necessary in the founding of a free, self-governing commonwealth, fit to take rank as one of the coordinate States of the Union, than that which seeks to establish it on the basis of the idea of the family, as consisting in and springing from the union for life of one man and one woman in the holy estate of matrimony"; United States Supreme Court Ruling, Murphy v. Ramsey 1885.
The hardest trail leads to the highest peak.
"A liberal is a person whose immediate interests are not at stake."
 
Posts: 4780 | Location: Idaho, USA | Registered: May 20, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Age Quod Agis
Picture of ArtieS
posted Hide Post
According the the Springfield Armory site, a synthetic stocked M1A Loaded model is 9.3 pounds, and a walnut stocked M1A Loaded model is 9.8; thus a .5 lb. difference. In both cases, the weight was given without magazine or ammo.



We may consent to be governed, but we will not be ruled. - Kevin D. Williamson, 2012
 
Posts: 8405 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: November 02, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ArtieS:
According the the Springfield Armory site, a synthetic stocked M1A Loaded model is 9.3 pounds, and a walnut stocked M1A Loaded model is 9.8; thus a .5 lb. difference. In both cases, the weight was given without magazine or ammo.


That's a good approximation, but keep in mind that the M1 Garand has a bit more wood than the M14/M1A. So it follows that the difference between a wood and synthetic Garand stock would be greater than just half a pound.

The Garand has two wooden handguards and a wooden buttstock.

The M14/M1A only has a wooden buttstock. The handguard is synthetic. (Only the earliest M14s had wooden handguards.)

The buttstocks are also dimensionally different, so it's not even an apples:apples comparison between the just buttstocks alone.

 
Posts: 19017 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Age Quod Agis
Picture of ArtieS
posted Hide Post
Good point. I misread the OP and assumed he was referring to M1A/M14 platforms where such stocks are readily interchangeable.



We may consent to be governed, but we will not be ruled. - Kevin D. Williamson, 2012
 
Posts: 8405 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: November 02, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Hop head
Picture of lyman
posted Hide Post
someone made plastic stocks for a M1, had a couple sets and sold them off a few years ago,

never weighed them, vs a wood set,

they were a bit fugly, compared to a nice wood stock



www.chesterfieldarmament.com
 
Posts: 5948 | Location: Beach VA,not VA Beach | Registered: July 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 45 Cal:
quote:
with a plastic set up.

What in the hell is wrong with great walnut wood?
I do not want any plastic shit or laminate on my treasures!




Said it for me. Big Grin

quote:
Originally posted by bendable:
nothing is wrong with it, not a single thing.

the only one that I got to shoot had major wood, and I shot it very well, its a very fun shooter, indeed.

but compared to some other guns it seemed on the heavy side.

just wondering if the weight was mostly from the wood or an abundance of metal


Shooting one will give one a partial impression. Handle one with a 1907 leather sling fitted, a cleaning kit and grease pots stowed in the stock compartment, and a 10" bayonet fixed and you'll be holding 10# or better in a walnut and forged steel spear. For the kind of fighting it was designed for, and did, it had to be a weapon all on its own without ammo. It is. I wouldn't want to diminish that.

If you have never gotten to field strip one, or handle one broken down, that would answer most of your question. The barreled action is the significant portion of the weight. The weight in the stock simply provides balance, again, which I wouldn't want to mess with.

A quick google gave me this, which should help give a better impression of what's going on here. See how beefy the barrel is? WWII handguards weren't as thick as Korean era and later aftermarket stuff but even then, there's not a lot a material or weight there. Front handguards aren't all that heavy either. A stock by itself feels about twice as heavy with a leather sling fitted and the combo tool and cleaning kit in the stock compartments.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: P220 Smudge,


_________________________
 
Posts: 8086 | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    m1 wood weight ?

© SIGforum 2017