SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Would the gun culture of 1934 drive the same number of guns as the gun culture of 2018-19
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Chris Orndorff, LDD
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Would the gun culture of 1934 drive the same number of guns as the gun culture of 2018-19 Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
I wasn't around in 34, but certainly grew up among adults that were. Basing my answer on the observation of those individuals, I'd say it wasn't even close.

There were a few individuals that were true collectors and had one of each caliber Model 70 Winchester, for example, but that was the exception. As others have said, A deer rifle or two a shotgun or two a .22 and maybe a couple of handguns was pretty typical. Almost no one had a CCW and those that did carried a j-frame very discretely.

The notion of firing hundreds of rounds of centerfire ammunition at a time was also unheard of. Guys would go "plinking" with a few hundred rounds of .22LR, but no mag dumps into the berm.
 
Posts: 8051 | Location: The Red part of Minnesota | Registered: October 06, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Golden age? Tough sell on that but certainly golden if choice and quality is your metric. The old guns were and are great. However, you couldn’t take 20 of them apart and mixup the pieces and get 20 operable firearms. Today that would be a no brainer.
 
Posts: 2248 | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As late as the 60's we were lucky to have half a box of 22 shorts to "plink" with. No one, but NO ONE, fired a "few hundred rounds." 45ACP ammo was 4.99 a box, equal to abut 26 bucks in 2019 dollars.
 
Posts: 14957 | Location: Lexington, KY | Registered: October 15, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
https://www.miamiherald.com/ne...Qu_2dkuyxDcWIxc5BYZ4

quote:
Miami Herald Logo Average gun owner now owns 8 guns, twice what it used to be | Miami Herald


NATIONAL
Average gun owner now owns 8 guns, twice what it used to be
By Christopher Ingraham

THE WASHINGTON POST

OCTOBER 22, 2015 01:54 AM
Play Video
Duration 1:50When is a background check mandatory for gun owners?

The Brady Act made background checks a requirement for guns purchased through licensed dealers. Here’s a brief look at how the current system works. BY NICOLE L. CVETNIC
There are nearly twice as many guns in the average gun-owning household today as there were 20 years ago, according to new Wonkblog estimates based data from surveys and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. In 2013, there were an estimated 8.1 firearms in the typical gun-owning household, according to these data. In 1994, the average gun-owning household owned 4.2 guns.

These numbers comport with what survey research has shown for several years now: the share of gun-owning households has been declining over the past 20 years and possibly more, according to numbers from Gallup and the General Social Survey. On the other hand, domestic firearm production and imports of firearms have risen sharply, particularly in recent years. If those numbers are correct, it follows that increasing gun purchases are being driven primarily by existing owners stocking up rather than first-time buyers.

Plenty has been written about the decline in overall gun ownership rates. Many of these stories are based on the General Social Survey’s data, which shows household ownership rates falling from over 50 percent in the 1970s to around 32 percent today. Some gun rights advocates dispute these numbers, preferring to use Gallup’s household ownership rates instead, which have remained essentially flat over the same period.

But even Gallup’s numbers show a decline in gun ownership since the early 1990s, from 54 percent of households in late 1993 to 43 percent as of this fall. And regardless of whether overall ownership rates are flat or falling, one thing that’s largely been overlooked is how more guns and fewer gun owners means that firearms are being concentrated in fewer hands than ever before.

Unlimited Digital Access: Only $0.99 For Your First Month
Get full access to Miami Herald content across all your devices.

SAVE NOW
I calculated the per-household estimates as follows: I multiplied the total number of households in the U.S. (from the Census) by the share of households owning guns. Given the differences between the Gallup and GSS numbers on household ownership (something of a survey mystery), rather than pick one I used them both, to create high and low bounds for the number of gun-owning households.


I divided the total number of guns in the U.S. by the number of gun-owning households to arrive at an average number of guns per household. For the final number each year, I took the average of the estimate created by the GSS and Gallup household ownership rates.

An important caveat, as always: these are estimates built upon estimates, so there’s a fair amount of wiggle room in the actual numbers. However, the overall trend of increasing guns per household is generally not in dispute. And the numbers comport with other estimates of the number of guns per gun-owning household, like a 2006 study finding that the average individual gun-owner owned 6.6 guns in 2004.

Also important: these are averages, which are a very blunt instrument for understanding the distribution of guns in the population. In all likelihood, there’s a situation where a small percentage of gun owners own a huge number of guns, which brings the average up for everyone. For instance, that same 2006 study found that the top 20 percent of gun owners owned 65 percent of America’s firearms. The top 3 percent of gun owners averaged over 25 firearms each.

For many owners, guns are like tools, and you need different tools for different jobs: a rifle for hunting deer. A shotgun for hunting duck. A pistol for self-defense. An AR-15 for fun. Etc.

But in recent years, it seems many gun owners have seen fit to expand their toolboxes. There are probably a number of factors driving this: fear-stoking by some gun rights groups in the wake of mass shootings can lead to surges in gun-buying from existing owners concerned the government could take their guns away. The rising popularity of “prepper” groups, who stock up on food and firearms in preparation for a variety of coming apocalypses, may also be playing a role.





Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/ne...c5BYZ4#storylink=cpy
 
Posts: 5434 | Location: Virginia | Registered: December 23, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
^^ I wonder sometimes why people like Ingraham never stop to consider that American gun owners, like all Americans, will occasionally do things just because we can.
 
Posts: 23374 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Yes, these are the good old days!
 
Posts: 1963 | Location: East Central Toadsuck, Florida | Registered: September 04, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
:^)
Picture of BillyBonesNY
posted Hide Post
1934 gun culture was more responsible, firearms were utilitarian, few were collectors.

In that time, more wasn't better, knowing how to use what you had was.

Gun culture was a smaller world, firearms weren't hyped in movies they way they are today.. which draws interest of folks who, frankly wouldn't have had an interest otherwise and maybe shouldn't.

There were always Fudds, before their disdain for AR's they looked down on "Saturday night specials" and milsurps.

It's a good time in the gunworld today, I enjoy it immensely!


----------------------------------------
http://lonesurvivorfoundation.org
 
Posts: 6983 | Registered: March 19, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Would the gun culture of 1934 drive the same number of guns as the gun culture of 2018-19

© SIGforum 2019